Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions

This study investigates the life expectancy (LE) and life cycle costs (LCC) of three alternatives of interior partitions in residential units: gypsum board, autoclaved concrete block, and hollow concrete block partitions. The aim is to examine the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of these parti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alon Urlainis, Monica Paciuk, Igal M. Shohet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/3/1233
_version_ 1797318984126693376
author Alon Urlainis
Monica Paciuk
Igal M. Shohet
author_facet Alon Urlainis
Monica Paciuk
Igal M. Shohet
author_sort Alon Urlainis
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates the life expectancy (LE) and life cycle costs (LCC) of three alternatives of interior partitions in residential units: gypsum board, autoclaved concrete block, and hollow concrete block partitions. The aim is to examine the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of these partitions in various service and occupancy conditions. Three different service conditions were analyzed: Standard (constructed without faults), Inherent Defect Conditions (with initial, non-progressing defects), and Failure Conditions (developing defects over time). To analyze the impact of occupancy conditions, six ‘negative occupancy factors’ were identified that accelerate partition deterioration, including non-ownership, poor maintenance, high residential density, the presence of young children, the presence of domestic animals, and the density of furniture. These factors define four occupancy condition categories: light, moderate, standard, and intensive. The research found that hollow concrete block partitions are the most durable, exceeding 100 years in light or moderate conditions. Gypsum board partitions, while cost-effective, have a lower life expectancy, needing replacement in 11–27 years in intensive conditions. Autoclaved concrete blocks offer moderate durability, with similar costs to hollow blocks in normal conditions. Overall, the study highlights the influence of service and occupancy on the lifespan of interior building components, and provides recommendations for partition type selection that are based on specific conditions. These recommendations are a pivotal outcome, highlighting the study’s significant contribution to the understanding of the long-term performance and sustainability of building materials in residential construction.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:00:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f1b06ef8272451a893856b728a40524
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:00:16Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1f1b06ef8272451a893856b728a405242024-02-09T15:08:20ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-02-01143123310.3390/app14031233Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight PartitionsAlon Urlainis0Monica Paciuk1Igal M. Shohet2Department of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, IsraelNational Building Research Institute, Technion-IIT, Haifa 32000, IsraelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 84105, IsraelThis study investigates the life expectancy (LE) and life cycle costs (LCC) of three alternatives of interior partitions in residential units: gypsum board, autoclaved concrete block, and hollow concrete block partitions. The aim is to examine the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of these partitions in various service and occupancy conditions. Three different service conditions were analyzed: Standard (constructed without faults), Inherent Defect Conditions (with initial, non-progressing defects), and Failure Conditions (developing defects over time). To analyze the impact of occupancy conditions, six ‘negative occupancy factors’ were identified that accelerate partition deterioration, including non-ownership, poor maintenance, high residential density, the presence of young children, the presence of domestic animals, and the density of furniture. These factors define four occupancy condition categories: light, moderate, standard, and intensive. The research found that hollow concrete block partitions are the most durable, exceeding 100 years in light or moderate conditions. Gypsum board partitions, while cost-effective, have a lower life expectancy, needing replacement in 11–27 years in intensive conditions. Autoclaved concrete blocks offer moderate durability, with similar costs to hollow blocks in normal conditions. Overall, the study highlights the influence of service and occupancy on the lifespan of interior building components, and provides recommendations for partition type selection that are based on specific conditions. These recommendations are a pivotal outcome, highlighting the study’s significant contribution to the understanding of the long-term performance and sustainability of building materials in residential construction.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/3/1233autoclaved aerated concretedeteriorationdurabilitygypsum boardhollow concrete blockslife cycle costs
spellingShingle Alon Urlainis
Monica Paciuk
Igal M. Shohet
Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
Applied Sciences
autoclaved aerated concrete
deterioration
durability
gypsum board
hollow concrete blocks
life cycle costs
title Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
title_full Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
title_fullStr Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
title_full_unstemmed Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
title_short Service Life Prediction and Life Cycle Costs of Light Weight Partitions
title_sort service life prediction and life cycle costs of light weight partitions
topic autoclaved aerated concrete
deterioration
durability
gypsum board
hollow concrete blocks
life cycle costs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/3/1233
work_keys_str_mv AT alonurlainis servicelifepredictionandlifecyclecostsoflightweightpartitions
AT monicapaciuk servicelifepredictionandlifecyclecostsoflightweightpartitions
AT igalmshohet servicelifepredictionandlifecyclecostsoflightweightpartitions