Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018
Social-ecological systems provide a comprehensive scientific framework for understanding the complex processes and interactions between natural and human systems. However, system analysis with assumptions of reducibility, linear trade-offs or synergies and separability, and methods to detect social-...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Ecological Indicators |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22003971 |
| _version_ | 1818006313731358720 |
|---|---|
| author | Cao Mengxue Lu Xiaoyan Qin Zhangxuan Liu Xiaolin Li Fei |
| author_facet | Cao Mengxue Lu Xiaoyan Qin Zhangxuan Liu Xiaolin Li Fei |
| author_sort | Cao Mengxue |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Social-ecological systems provide a comprehensive scientific framework for understanding the complex processes and interactions between natural and human systems. However, system analysis with assumptions of reducibility, linear trade-offs or synergies and separability, and methods to detect social-ecological system transitions from time series are not sufficient to deal with the challenges of sustainable development. The interpretation of the spatial pattern is a potentially powerful choice for understanding social-ecological system transitions. Therefore, this study mapped social-ecological system archetypes by combining dominant function identification and K-means clustering methods. Results showed that Food Production Space, Economic Development Space and Ecological Service Space constituted the main archetypes of social-ecological systems, which covered about 8.7%, 1% and 78.1% of China respectively in 2018. Ecological-Food Space, Food-Economic Space, and Economic-Ecological Space reflected the key areas and hotspots for social-ecological system transitions, characterized by Economic Development Space expansion, Food Production Space reconstruction and Ecological Service Space contraction. Between 1990 and 2018, about 10.6% of the social-ecological system underwent transformation, mainly manifested in the transition of Food Production Space into Food-Economic Space (4.37 Mha) and Ecological-Food Space (8.34 Mha), and in the transition of Food-Economic Space to Food Production Space (9.16 Mha) and Economic Development Space (4.19 Mha). The pathways of social-ecological system transitions were mainly affected by factors such as institution, policy, capital, location, technology, population, cognition, and culture. These factors drove social-ecological system transitions through the mechanisms of community crisis response and individual interest induction. It suggested that sustainable development efforts should be focused on limiting the increase in driving factors that may weaken the critical feedback process, thereby maintaining the stability of the desired social-ecological systems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T05:00:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1f2a2360cb804aeeb54a2c60379e20bd |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1470-160X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T05:00:27Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecological Indicators |
| spelling | doaj.art-1f2a2360cb804aeeb54a2c60379e20bd2022-12-22T02:10:59ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2022-06-01139108926Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018Cao Mengxue0Lu Xiaoyan1Qin Zhangxuan2Liu Xiaolin3Li Fei4College of Mathematics and Physics, Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, ChinaCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, ChinaCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, ChinaCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, ChinaCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China; Corresponding author.Social-ecological systems provide a comprehensive scientific framework for understanding the complex processes and interactions between natural and human systems. However, system analysis with assumptions of reducibility, linear trade-offs or synergies and separability, and methods to detect social-ecological system transitions from time series are not sufficient to deal with the challenges of sustainable development. The interpretation of the spatial pattern is a potentially powerful choice for understanding social-ecological system transitions. Therefore, this study mapped social-ecological system archetypes by combining dominant function identification and K-means clustering methods. Results showed that Food Production Space, Economic Development Space and Ecological Service Space constituted the main archetypes of social-ecological systems, which covered about 8.7%, 1% and 78.1% of China respectively in 2018. Ecological-Food Space, Food-Economic Space, and Economic-Ecological Space reflected the key areas and hotspots for social-ecological system transitions, characterized by Economic Development Space expansion, Food Production Space reconstruction and Ecological Service Space contraction. Between 1990 and 2018, about 10.6% of the social-ecological system underwent transformation, mainly manifested in the transition of Food Production Space into Food-Economic Space (4.37 Mha) and Ecological-Food Space (8.34 Mha), and in the transition of Food-Economic Space to Food Production Space (9.16 Mha) and Economic Development Space (4.19 Mha). The pathways of social-ecological system transitions were mainly affected by factors such as institution, policy, capital, location, technology, population, cognition, and culture. These factors drove social-ecological system transitions through the mechanisms of community crisis response and individual interest induction. It suggested that sustainable development efforts should be focused on limiting the increase in driving factors that may weaken the critical feedback process, thereby maintaining the stability of the desired social-ecological systems.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22003971Social-ecological systemTransition pathwaysFood productionEcological serviceHuman activity |
| spellingShingle | Cao Mengxue Lu Xiaoyan Qin Zhangxuan Liu Xiaolin Li Fei Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 Ecological Indicators Social-ecological system Transition pathways Food production Ecological service Human activity |
| title | Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 |
| title_full | Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 |
| title_fullStr | Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 |
| title_short | Social-ecological system changes in China from 1990 to 2018 |
| title_sort | social ecological system changes in china from 1990 to 2018 |
| topic | Social-ecological system Transition pathways Food production Ecological service Human activity |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22003971 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caomengxue socialecologicalsystemchangesinchinafrom1990to2018 AT luxiaoyan socialecologicalsystemchangesinchinafrom1990to2018 AT qinzhangxuan socialecologicalsystemchangesinchinafrom1990to2018 AT liuxiaolin socialecologicalsystemchangesinchinafrom1990to2018 AT lifei socialecologicalsystemchangesinchinafrom1990to2018 |