Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building

The current decarbonization transition to be achieved by 2050 according to the European Council has given great prominence to the use of Digital Twins as tools for energy management. For their correct operation, it is essential to control the uncertainties of the energy models, which lead to differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriela Bastos Porsani, María Fernández-Vigil Iglesias, Juan Bautista Echeverría Trueba, Carlos Fernández Bandera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-02-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/2/421
_version_ 1827343914632216576
author Gabriela Bastos Porsani
María Fernández-Vigil Iglesias
Juan Bautista Echeverría Trueba
Carlos Fernández Bandera
author_facet Gabriela Bastos Porsani
María Fernández-Vigil Iglesias
Juan Bautista Echeverría Trueba
Carlos Fernández Bandera
author_sort Gabriela Bastos Porsani
collection DOAJ
description The current decarbonization transition to be achieved by 2050 according to the European Council has given great prominence to the use of Digital Twins as tools for energy management. For their correct operation, it is essential to control the uncertainties of the energy models, which lead to differences between the measured and predicted data. One of the key parameters that is most difficult to assess numerically is air leakage. The existent infiltration models available in EnergyPlus were developed to be applied in low-rise residential buildings with fewer than three stories. Therefore, it is common to rely on air leakage equations employing predefined coefficients. This research presents an empirical assessment of the performance of two EnergyPlus air leakage models, the “Effective Leakage Area” and the “Flow Coefficient”, in predicting dynamic infiltration within the attic of a seven-story building. Blower door tests, along with the application of CO<sub>2</sub> tracer gas, were conducted to establish coefficients for the models. Then, they were evaluated in three independent periods according to the criteria established in the American Society for Testing Material D5157 Standard. Those models that only used in situ coefficients consistently met the standard across all three periods, demonstrating for both equations their accurate performance and reliability. For the best model derived from tracer gas data, the R<sup>2</sup> and NMSE values are 0.94 and 0.019, respectively. In contrast, the model developed using blower door test data and EnergyPlus default values presented a 64% reduction in accuracy compared to the best one. This discrepancy could potentially lead to misleading energy estimates. Although other software options exist for estimating infiltration, this study specifically targets EnergyPlus users. Therefore, these findings offer valuable insights to make more informed decisions when implementing the infiltration models into energy simulations for high-rise buildings using EnergyPlus.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:39:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f319155d398450ba302cf981255394a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:39:24Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-1f319155d398450ba302cf981255394a2024-02-23T15:10:11ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092024-02-0114242110.3390/buildings14020421Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story BuildingGabriela Bastos Porsani0María Fernández-Vigil Iglesias1Juan Bautista Echeverría Trueba2Carlos Fernández Bandera3School of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, SpainSchool of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, SpainSchool of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, SpainSchool of Technology, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, SpainThe current decarbonization transition to be achieved by 2050 according to the European Council has given great prominence to the use of Digital Twins as tools for energy management. For their correct operation, it is essential to control the uncertainties of the energy models, which lead to differences between the measured and predicted data. One of the key parameters that is most difficult to assess numerically is air leakage. The existent infiltration models available in EnergyPlus were developed to be applied in low-rise residential buildings with fewer than three stories. Therefore, it is common to rely on air leakage equations employing predefined coefficients. This research presents an empirical assessment of the performance of two EnergyPlus air leakage models, the “Effective Leakage Area” and the “Flow Coefficient”, in predicting dynamic infiltration within the attic of a seven-story building. Blower door tests, along with the application of CO<sub>2</sub> tracer gas, were conducted to establish coefficients for the models. Then, they were evaluated in three independent periods according to the criteria established in the American Society for Testing Material D5157 Standard. Those models that only used in situ coefficients consistently met the standard across all three periods, demonstrating for both equations their accurate performance and reliability. For the best model derived from tracer gas data, the R<sup>2</sup> and NMSE values are 0.94 and 0.019, respectively. In contrast, the model developed using blower door test data and EnergyPlus default values presented a 64% reduction in accuracy compared to the best one. This discrepancy could potentially lead to misleading energy estimates. Although other software options exist for estimating infiltration, this study specifically targets EnergyPlus users. Therefore, these findings offer valuable insights to make more informed decisions when implementing the infiltration models into energy simulations for high-rise buildings using EnergyPlus.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/2/421blower doorbuilding energy modeldecarbonizationdecay methoddigital twinsinfiltration modeling
spellingShingle Gabriela Bastos Porsani
María Fernández-Vigil Iglesias
Juan Bautista Echeverría Trueba
Carlos Fernández Bandera
Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
Buildings
blower door
building energy model
decarbonization
decay method
digital twins
infiltration modeling
title Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
title_full Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
title_fullStr Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
title_full_unstemmed Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
title_short Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building
title_sort infiltration models in energyplus empirical assessment for a case study in a seven story building
topic blower door
building energy model
decarbonization
decay method
digital twins
infiltration modeling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/2/421
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielabastosporsani infiltrationmodelsinenergyplusempiricalassessmentforacasestudyinasevenstorybuilding
AT mariafernandezvigiliglesias infiltrationmodelsinenergyplusempiricalassessmentforacasestudyinasevenstorybuilding
AT juanbautistaecheverriatrueba infiltrationmodelsinenergyplusempiricalassessmentforacasestudyinasevenstorybuilding
AT carlosfernandezbandera infiltrationmodelsinenergyplusempiricalassessmentforacasestudyinasevenstorybuilding