Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes

Shumpei Obata, Yusuke Ichiyama, Masashi Kakinoki, Osamu Sawada, Yoshitsugu Saishin, Masahito Ohji Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, JapanCorrespondence: Shumpei ObataShiga University of Medical Science, 520 – 2192, Seta Tsukinowacho, Otsu City, Shiga,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Obata S, Ichiyama Y, Kakinoki M, Sawada O, Saishin Y, Ohji M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-12-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-surgical-outcomes-between-two-types-of-lamellar-macular--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
_version_ 1819015705483280384
author Obata S
Ichiyama Y
Kakinoki M
Sawada O
Saishin Y
Ohji M
author_facet Obata S
Ichiyama Y
Kakinoki M
Sawada O
Saishin Y
Ohji M
author_sort Obata S
collection DOAJ
description Shumpei Obata, Yusuke Ichiyama, Masashi Kakinoki, Osamu Sawada, Yoshitsugu Saishin, Masahito Ohji Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, JapanCorrespondence: Shumpei ObataShiga University of Medical Science, 520 – 2192, Seta Tsukinowacho, Otsu City, Shiga, JapanTel +81-77-548-2276Fax +81-77-548-2279Email obata326@belle.shiga-med.ac.jpPurpose: The classification of lamellar macular holes (LMHs) into two subtypes has recently been proposed. However, the effectiveness of vitrectomy for treatment of each type of LMH is not well established. The goal of this study was to compare functional and anatomic changes after vitrectomy between eyes with degenerative LMH and those with tractional LMH.Patients and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with LMH who underwent vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured preoperatively (baseline), as well as at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. BCVA and CMT were compared between eyes with degenerative LMH and those with tractional LMH.Results: Thirty-two eyes met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen eyes were diagnosed with degenerative LMH and 19 eyes were diagnosed with tractional LMH. Compared with baseline BCVA, postoperative BCVA improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively: from 0.33 to 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in eyes with degenerative LMH and from 0.30 to 0.12 logMAR in eyes with tractional LMH (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). BCVA at 12 months postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two groups. CMT decreased significantly from 419.4 μm at baseline to 364.2 μm at 12 months postoperatively in eyes with tractional LMH (p < 0.05); conversely, there was no significant difference in eyes with degenerative LMH (315.5 μm baseline to 314.9 μm at 12 months postoperatively; p > 0.05).Conclusion: Vitrectomy improved BCVA in eyes with degenerative LMH as well as in eyes with tractional LMH. BCVA at 12 months postoperatively did not differ between the two groups.Keywords: lamellar macular hole, surgery, visual acuity, ellipsoid zone
first_indexed 2024-12-21T02:35:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f3d2dc0bd56403490975d2ec76b8041
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T02:35:59Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-1f3d2dc0bd56403490975d2ec76b80412022-12-21T19:18:48ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832019-12-01Volume 132541254650565Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular HolesObata SIchiyama YKakinoki MSawada OSaishin YOhji MShumpei Obata, Yusuke Ichiyama, Masashi Kakinoki, Osamu Sawada, Yoshitsugu Saishin, Masahito Ohji Department of Ophthalmology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, JapanCorrespondence: Shumpei ObataShiga University of Medical Science, 520 – 2192, Seta Tsukinowacho, Otsu City, Shiga, JapanTel +81-77-548-2276Fax +81-77-548-2279Email obata326@belle.shiga-med.ac.jpPurpose: The classification of lamellar macular holes (LMHs) into two subtypes has recently been proposed. However, the effectiveness of vitrectomy for treatment of each type of LMH is not well established. The goal of this study was to compare functional and anatomic changes after vitrectomy between eyes with degenerative LMH and those with tractional LMH.Patients and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with LMH who underwent vitrectomy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured preoperatively (baseline), as well as at 1, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. BCVA and CMT were compared between eyes with degenerative LMH and those with tractional LMH.Results: Thirty-two eyes met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen eyes were diagnosed with degenerative LMH and 19 eyes were diagnosed with tractional LMH. Compared with baseline BCVA, postoperative BCVA improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively: from 0.33 to 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in eyes with degenerative LMH and from 0.30 to 0.12 logMAR in eyes with tractional LMH (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). BCVA at 12 months postoperatively did not significantly differ between the two groups. CMT decreased significantly from 419.4 μm at baseline to 364.2 μm at 12 months postoperatively in eyes with tractional LMH (p < 0.05); conversely, there was no significant difference in eyes with degenerative LMH (315.5 μm baseline to 314.9 μm at 12 months postoperatively; p > 0.05).Conclusion: Vitrectomy improved BCVA in eyes with degenerative LMH as well as in eyes with tractional LMH. BCVA at 12 months postoperatively did not differ between the two groups.Keywords: lamellar macular hole, surgery, visual acuity, ellipsoid zonehttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-surgical-outcomes-between-two-types-of-lamellar-macular--peer-reviewed-article-OPTHlamellar macular holesurgeryvisual acuityellipsoid zone
spellingShingle Obata S
Ichiyama Y
Kakinoki M
Sawada O
Saishin Y
Ohji M
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
Clinical Ophthalmology
lamellar macular hole
surgery
visual acuity
ellipsoid zone
title Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
title_full Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
title_fullStr Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
title_short Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Two Types of Lamellar Macular Holes
title_sort comparison of surgical outcomes between two types of lamellar macular holes
topic lamellar macular hole
surgery
visual acuity
ellipsoid zone
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-surgical-outcomes-between-two-types-of-lamellar-macular--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT obatas comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes
AT ichiyamay comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes
AT kakinokim comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes
AT sawadao comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes
AT saishiny comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes
AT ohjim comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweentwotypesoflamellarmacularholes