Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats

Contemporary threats significantly differ from traditional ones. It is no longer enough to rely on traditional “analytical-estimation” theories and models for the assessment of new threats. Proportional to the transformations which took place in the nature, dimensions, and methods of the operational...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria Kazempour, Mohsen Bahrami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Command and Staff University 2018-11-01
Series:آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dfsr.ir/article_34286_d528544f0bbb078d772a27159f8f5c57.pdf
_version_ 1811161252445028352
author Zakaria Kazempour
Mohsen Bahrami
author_facet Zakaria Kazempour
Mohsen Bahrami
author_sort Zakaria Kazempour
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary threats significantly differ from traditional ones. It is no longer enough to rely on traditional “analytical-estimation” theories and models for the assessment of new threats. Proportional to the transformations which took place in the nature, dimensions, and methods of the operationalization of threats it is necessary to design and offer more advanced analytical frameworks and assessment models in the area of threats. The present research is one of the first attempts to respond to this need. In this research, “futures studies" were performed in the field of defense-security and issues related to “threat identification” which resulted in the presentation of a model titled “threat dissection analysis”. This method performs a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the intensity of smart threats via Raymond Quivy – Luc Van Campenhoudt’s indexing method in form of three dimensions (hard, semi-hard and soft) four factors (approaching, behavioral, structural and implemental), eight major indices (type of threat, size of threat, extent of threat, time of threat, depth of threat, repetition of threat, domain of threat and location of threat), 24 basic indices and 120 relative sub-indices. This study employed a normative approach with a mixed methods research design. The tools utilized to collect explicit knowledge included documentary research and web mining. The tools used to collect implicit knowledge were distributed questionnaires. To verify and validate the data, interviews, expert opinion, and validity (credibility) and reliability (confidence) assessment of the questionnaires were employed to make sure that the questionnaire’s questions match the research objectives and ensure its repeatability.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:11:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f4870b668b14d489987b8050a746bb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2588-428X
2645-7172
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:11:27Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Command and Staff University
record_format Article
series آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی
spelling doaj.art-1f4870b668b14d489987b8050a746bb72023-03-02T12:26:35ZengCommand and Staff Universityآینده‌پژوهی دفاعی2588-428X2645-71722018-11-0131012114734286Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threatsZakaria Kazempour0Mohsen Bahrami1Ph.D. Student in Futures Studies, Department of Management, Science and Technology, AmirKabir University of TechnologyProfessor in AmirKabir University of TechnologyContemporary threats significantly differ from traditional ones. It is no longer enough to rely on traditional “analytical-estimation” theories and models for the assessment of new threats. Proportional to the transformations which took place in the nature, dimensions, and methods of the operationalization of threats it is necessary to design and offer more advanced analytical frameworks and assessment models in the area of threats. The present research is one of the first attempts to respond to this need. In this research, “futures studies" were performed in the field of defense-security and issues related to “threat identification” which resulted in the presentation of a model titled “threat dissection analysis”. This method performs a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the intensity of smart threats via Raymond Quivy – Luc Van Campenhoudt’s indexing method in form of three dimensions (hard, semi-hard and soft) four factors (approaching, behavioral, structural and implemental), eight major indices (type of threat, size of threat, extent of threat, time of threat, depth of threat, repetition of threat, domain of threat and location of threat), 24 basic indices and 120 relative sub-indices. This study employed a normative approach with a mixed methods research design. The tools utilized to collect explicit knowledge included documentary research and web mining. The tools used to collect implicit knowledge were distributed questionnaires. To verify and validate the data, interviews, expert opinion, and validity (credibility) and reliability (confidence) assessment of the questionnaires were employed to make sure that the questionnaire’s questions match the research objectives and ensure its repeatability.http://www.dfsr.ir/article_34286_d528544f0bbb078d772a27159f8f5c57.pdfthreatthreat assessmentsmart threatsmodelingfutures studies
spellingShingle Zakaria Kazempour
Mohsen Bahrami
Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
آینده‌پژوهی دفاعی
threat
threat assessment
smart threats
modeling
futures studies
title Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
title_full Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
title_fullStr Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
title_full_unstemmed Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
title_short Presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
title_sort presenting a model for assessment of future smart threats
topic threat
threat assessment
smart threats
modeling
futures studies
url http://www.dfsr.ir/article_34286_d528544f0bbb078d772a27159f8f5c57.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zakariakazempour presentingamodelforassessmentoffuturesmartthreats
AT mohsenbahrami presentingamodelforassessmentoffuturesmartthreats