Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes

Abstract Background While porcine seems to be superior to bovine surfactants in terms of respiratory outcomes, it is unclear if a surfactant can improve extra-pulmonary outcomes in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome and if there is any physiopathological/biological mechanism linking...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvia Foligno, Daniele De Luca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-01-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1267-8
_version_ 1818600203080433664
author Silvia Foligno
Daniele De Luca
author_facet Silvia Foligno
Daniele De Luca
author_sort Silvia Foligno
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While porcine seems to be superior to bovine surfactants in terms of respiratory outcomes, it is unclear if a surfactant can improve extra-pulmonary outcomes in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome and if there is any physiopathological/biological mechanism linking surfactant therapy to these outcomes. We aim to fill these knowledge gaps. Methods Systematic and pragmatic review coupled with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bovine or porcine surfactants administered to treat RDS in preterm neonates; common extra-pulmonary neonatal intensive care outcomes were considered. As additional analysis, animal or human translational studies about mechanisms linking surfactant replacement to extra-pulmonary neonatal outcomes were also systematically reviewed. Results Porcine surfactant is associated with lower incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (OR:0.655; 95%CI:0.460–0.931); p = 0.018; 12 trials; 1472 patients); prenatal steroids (coeff.:-0.009, 95%CI:-0.03–0.009, p = 0.323) and gestational age (coeff.:0.079, 95%CI:-0.18–0.34, p = 0.554) did not influence this effect size. No significant differences were found between porcine and bovine surfactants on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay (mean difference (days):-2.977; 95%CI:-6.659–0.705; p = 0.113; 8 trials; 855 patients), intra-ventricular hemorrhage of any grade (OR:0.860; 95%CI:0.648–1.139); p = 0.293; 15 trials; 1703 patients), severe intra-ventricular hemorrhage (OR:0.852; 95%CI:0.624–1.163); p = 0.313; 15 trials; 1672 patients), necrotizing entero-colitis (OR:1.190; 95%CI:0.785–1.803); p = 0.412; 9 trials; 1097 patients) and retinopathy of prematurity (OR:0.801; 95%CI:0.480–1.337); p = 0.396; 10 trials; 962 patients). Conclusions Physiopathological mechanisms explaining the effect of surfactant have been found for patent ductus arteriosus only, while they are lacking for all other endpoints. Porcine surfactant is associated with lower incidence of PDA than bovine surfactants. As there are no differences in terms of other extra-pulmonary outcomes and no physiopathological plausibility, these endpoints should not be used in future trials. Registration PROSPERO n.CRD42018100906.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T12:31:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f4aa717beee4498af520a84a9624556
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1465-993X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T12:31:45Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj.art-1f4aa717beee4498af520a84a96245562022-12-21T22:31:41ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-993X2020-01-0121111010.1186/s12931-019-1267-8Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomesSilvia Foligno0Daniele De Luca1Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, Medical Center “A. Béclère”, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)Division of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, Medical Center “A. Béclère”, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) and Paris-Saclay UniversityAbstract Background While porcine seems to be superior to bovine surfactants in terms of respiratory outcomes, it is unclear if a surfactant can improve extra-pulmonary outcomes in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome and if there is any physiopathological/biological mechanism linking surfactant therapy to these outcomes. We aim to fill these knowledge gaps. Methods Systematic and pragmatic review coupled with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of bovine or porcine surfactants administered to treat RDS in preterm neonates; common extra-pulmonary neonatal intensive care outcomes were considered. As additional analysis, animal or human translational studies about mechanisms linking surfactant replacement to extra-pulmonary neonatal outcomes were also systematically reviewed. Results Porcine surfactant is associated with lower incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (OR:0.655; 95%CI:0.460–0.931); p = 0.018; 12 trials; 1472 patients); prenatal steroids (coeff.:-0.009, 95%CI:-0.03–0.009, p = 0.323) and gestational age (coeff.:0.079, 95%CI:-0.18–0.34, p = 0.554) did not influence this effect size. No significant differences were found between porcine and bovine surfactants on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay (mean difference (days):-2.977; 95%CI:-6.659–0.705; p = 0.113; 8 trials; 855 patients), intra-ventricular hemorrhage of any grade (OR:0.860; 95%CI:0.648–1.139); p = 0.293; 15 trials; 1703 patients), severe intra-ventricular hemorrhage (OR:0.852; 95%CI:0.624–1.163); p = 0.313; 15 trials; 1672 patients), necrotizing entero-colitis (OR:1.190; 95%CI:0.785–1.803); p = 0.412; 9 trials; 1097 patients) and retinopathy of prematurity (OR:0.801; 95%CI:0.480–1.337); p = 0.396; 10 trials; 962 patients). Conclusions Physiopathological mechanisms explaining the effect of surfactant have been found for patent ductus arteriosus only, while they are lacking for all other endpoints. Porcine surfactant is associated with lower incidence of PDA than bovine surfactants. As there are no differences in terms of other extra-pulmonary outcomes and no physiopathological plausibility, these endpoints should not be used in future trials. Registration PROSPERO n.CRD42018100906.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1267-8SurfactantNon-respiratory outcomePlausibilityTherapy
spellingShingle Silvia Foligno
Daniele De Luca
Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
Respiratory Research
Surfactant
Non-respiratory outcome
Plausibility
Therapy
title Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
title_full Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
title_fullStr Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
title_short Porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for RDS in preterm neonates: pragmatic meta-analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra-pulmonary outcomes
title_sort porcine versus bovine surfactant therapy for rds in preterm neonates pragmatic meta analysis and review of physiopathological plausibility of the effects on extra pulmonary outcomes
topic Surfactant
Non-respiratory outcome
Plausibility
Therapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1267-8
work_keys_str_mv AT silviafoligno porcineversusbovinesurfactanttherapyforrdsinpretermneonatespragmaticmetaanalysisandreviewofphysiopathologicalplausibilityoftheeffectsonextrapulmonaryoutcomes
AT danieledeluca porcineversusbovinesurfactanttherapyforrdsinpretermneonatespragmaticmetaanalysisandreviewofphysiopathologicalplausibilityoftheeffectsonextrapulmonaryoutcomes