A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery

Background: Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used per se. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stuart M. White
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:BJA Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054
_version_ 1797271234567733248
author Stuart M. White
author_facet Stuart M. White
author_sort Stuart M. White
collection DOAJ
description Background: Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used per se. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia. Methods: In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg). Results: Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% vs 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both <0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% vs 19.6%, P=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% vs 24.3%, P=0.0099) than the remaining ‘normotensive’ cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure. Conclusions: Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower vs higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group. Clinical trial registration: NCT05799300.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T13:58:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f4c4db546794e6b8e10afde1d393db7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-6096
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T13:58:50Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series BJA Open
spelling doaj.art-1f4c4db546794e6b8e10afde1d393db72024-03-07T05:30:42ZengElsevierBJA Open2772-60962024-03-019100261A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgeryStuart M. White0Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UKBackground: Careful administration of either spinal (intrathecal) or general anaesthesia probably has a greater impact on outcomes after hip fracture surgery than which method is used per se. Intraoperative hypotension is associated with poorer outcomes, but appears less prevalent using lower doses of spinal anaesthesia. Methods: In this observational single-centre study, intraoperative noninvasive blood pressure data were analysed from 280 patients undergoing unilateral hip fracture surgery after the administration of hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine 0.5%, 1.3 ml (0.65 mg). Results: Mean cohort mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained within 10% of baseline (spinal injection) MAP for 97/98 (99.0%) subsequent aggregated 1-min recording intervals. The prevalences of lowest MAP <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were significantly lower than historical equivalents (Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice 1 and 2) (52.9% and 10.4% vs 71.9% and 23.8%, respectively, both <0.0001). The proportions of 10 551 MAP readings <70 mm Hg and <55 mm Hg were 6.7% and 0.4%, respectively. Forty-five (16.1%) patients had relatively persistent hypotension (MAP ≤70 mm Hg for five or more intraoperative readings), and were statistically more likely to be frail (Nottingham Hip Fracture Score ≥7/10, 37.8% vs 19.6%, P=0.0109) and be taking alpha-/beta-blockers (44.4% vs 24.3%, P=0.0099) than the remaining ‘normotensive’ cohort. Surgical anaesthesia remained effective for up to 190 min, with only one patient requiring supplemental local anaesthesia during skin closure. Conclusions: Low doses of hyperbaric spinal 0.5% bupivacaine (1.3 ml, 6.5 mg) are associated with minimal reductions in blood pressure during surgery and provide adequate duration of surgical anaesthesia. Randomised comparisons of lower vs higher/standard doses of spinal anaesthesia are now required to confirm outcome benefits in this vulnerable patient group. Clinical trial registration: NCT05799300.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054anaesthesiacardiovascular effectsspinalsurgeryhip fracture
spellingShingle Stuart M. White
A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
BJA Open
anaesthesia
cardiovascular effects
spinal
surgery
hip fracture
title A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
title_full A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
title_fullStr A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
title_short A retrospective, observational, single-centre, cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low-dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
title_sort retrospective observational single centre cohort database analysis of the haemodynamic effects of low dose spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
topic anaesthesia
cardiovascular effects
spinal
surgery
hip fracture
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000054
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartmwhite aretrospectiveobservationalsinglecentrecohortdatabaseanalysisofthehaemodynamiceffectsoflowdosespinalanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgery
AT stuartmwhite retrospectiveobservationalsinglecentrecohortdatabaseanalysisofthehaemodynamiceffectsoflowdosespinalanaesthesiaforhipfracturesurgery