The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)

Background Information retrieval in primary care is becoming more difficult as the volume of medical information held in electronic databases expands. The lexical structure of this information might permit automatic indexing and improved retrieval. Objective To determine the possibility of identifyi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Dawes, Pierre Pluye, Laura Shea, Roland Grad, Arlene Greenberg, Jian-Yun Nie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2007-01-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/640
_version_ 1818161977955975168
author Martin Dawes
Pierre Pluye
Laura Shea
Roland Grad
Arlene Greenberg
Jian-Yun Nie
author_facet Martin Dawes
Pierre Pluye
Laura Shea
Roland Grad
Arlene Greenberg
Jian-Yun Nie
author_sort Martin Dawes
collection DOAJ
description Background Information retrieval in primary care is becoming more difficult as the volume of medical information held in electronic databases expands. The lexical structure of this information might permit automatic indexing and improved retrieval. Objective To determine the possibility of identifying the key elements of clinical studies, namely Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR), from abstracts of medical journals. Methods We used a convenience sample of 20 synopses from the journal Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and their matching original journal article abstracts obtained from PubMed. Three independent primary care professionals identified PECODR-related extracts of text. Rules were developed to define each PECODR element and the selection process of characters, words, phrases and sentences. From the extracts of text related to PECODR elements, potential lexical patterns that might help identify those elements were proposed and assessed using NVivo software. Results A total of 835 PECODR-related text extracts containing 41 263 individual text characters were identified from 20 EBM journal synopses. There were 759 extracts in the corresponding PubMed abstracts containing 31 947 characters. PECODR elements were found in nearly all abstracts and synopses with the exception of duration. There was agreement on 86.6%of the extracts from the 20 EBM synopses and 85.0% on the corresponding PubMed abstracts. After consensus this rose to 98.4% and 96.9% respectively. We found potential text patterns in the Comparison, Outcome and Results elements of both EBM synopses and PubMed abstracts. Some phrases and words are used frequently and are specific for these elements in both synopses and abstracts. Conclusions Results suggest a PECODR-related structure exists in medical abstracts and that there might be lexical patterns specific to these elements. More sophisticated computer-assisted lexical-semantic analysis might refine these results, and pave the way to automating PECODR indexing, and improve information retrieval in primary care.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:26:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f5a95d930e2416a8414a5fb88ca417d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:26:21Z
publishDate 2007-01-01
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
record_format Article
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
spelling doaj.art-1f5a95d930e2416a8414a5fb88ca417d2022-12-22T00:58:42ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632007-01-0115191610.14236/jhi.v15i1.640582The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)Martin DawesPierre PluyeLaura SheaRoland GradArlene GreenbergJian-Yun NieBackground Information retrieval in primary care is becoming more difficult as the volume of medical information held in electronic databases expands. The lexical structure of this information might permit automatic indexing and improved retrieval. Objective To determine the possibility of identifying the key elements of clinical studies, namely Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR), from abstracts of medical journals. Methods We used a convenience sample of 20 synopses from the journal Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and their matching original journal article abstracts obtained from PubMed. Three independent primary care professionals identified PECODR-related extracts of text. Rules were developed to define each PECODR element and the selection process of characters, words, phrases and sentences. From the extracts of text related to PECODR elements, potential lexical patterns that might help identify those elements were proposed and assessed using NVivo software. Results A total of 835 PECODR-related text extracts containing 41 263 individual text characters were identified from 20 EBM journal synopses. There were 759 extracts in the corresponding PubMed abstracts containing 31 947 characters. PECODR elements were found in nearly all abstracts and synopses with the exception of duration. There was agreement on 86.6%of the extracts from the 20 EBM synopses and 85.0% on the corresponding PubMed abstracts. After consensus this rose to 98.4% and 96.9% respectively. We found potential text patterns in the Comparison, Outcome and Results elements of both EBM synopses and PubMed abstracts. Some phrases and words are used frequently and are specific for these elements in both synopses and abstracts. Conclusions Results suggest a PECODR-related structure exists in medical abstracts and that there might be lexical patterns specific to these elements. More sophisticated computer-assisted lexical-semantic analysis might refine these results, and pave the way to automating PECODR indexing, and improve information retrieval in primary care.https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/640abstracting and indexinginformation storage and retrievalknowledge basesmedical subject headings (MeSH)Medlineprimary care
spellingShingle Martin Dawes
Pierre Pluye
Laura Shea
Roland Grad
Arlene Greenberg
Jian-Yun Nie
The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
abstracting and indexing
information storage and retrieval
knowledge bases
medical subject headings (MeSH)
Medline
primary care
title The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
title_full The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
title_fullStr The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
title_full_unstemmed The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
title_short The identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts: Patient_Population_Problem, Exposure_Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Duration and Results (PECODR)
title_sort identification of clinically important elements within medical journal abstracts patient population problem exposure intervention comparison outcome duration and results pecodr
topic abstracting and indexing
information storage and retrieval
knowledge bases
medical subject headings (MeSH)
Medline
primary care
url https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/640
work_keys_str_mv AT martindawes theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT pierrepluye theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT laurashea theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT rolandgrad theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT arlenegreenberg theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT jianyunnie theidentificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT martindawes identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT pierrepluye identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT laurashea identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT rolandgrad identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT arlenegreenberg identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr
AT jianyunnie identificationofclinicallyimportantelementswithinmedicaljournalabstractspatientpopulationproblemexposureinterventioncomparisonoutcomedurationandresultspecodr