Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The advent of urine testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>has raised the possibility of large-scale screening for this sexually transmitted infection, which is now the most common in the United Kingdom. The purpose o...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2006-04-01
|
| Series: | BMC Public Health |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/106 |
| _version_ | 1819177612911575040 |
|---|---|
| author | Low Nicola Graham Anna Sanford Emma Mills Nicola Campbell Rona Peters Tim J |
| author_facet | Low Nicola Graham Anna Sanford Emma Mills Nicola Campbell Rona Peters Tim J |
| author_sort | Low Nicola |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The advent of urine testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>has raised the possibility of large-scale screening for this sexually transmitted infection, which is now the most common in the United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an invitation to be screened for chlamydia and of receiving a negative result on levels of anxiety, depression and self-esteem.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>19,773 men and women aged 16 to 39 years, selected at random from 27 general practices in two large city areas (Bristol and Birmingham) were invited by post to send home-collected urine samples or vulvo-vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. Questionnaires enquiring about anxiety, depression and self-esteem were sent to random samples of those offered screening: one month before the dispatch of invitations; when participants returned samples; and after receiving a negative result.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Home screening was associated with an overall reduction in anxiety scores. An invitation to participate did not increase anxiety levels. Anxiety scores in men were lower after receiving the invitation than at baseline. Amongst women anxiety was reduced after receipt of negative test results. Neither depression nor self-esteem scores were affected by screening.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Postal screening for chlamydia does not appear to have a negative impact on overall psychological well-being and can lead to a decrease in anxiety levels among respondents. There is, however, a clear difference between men and women in when this reduction occurs.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:29:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1f63a96b42b04975bba844bd55d061b7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1471-2458 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:29:26Z |
| publishDate | 2006-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Public Health |
| spelling | doaj.art-1f63a96b42b04975bba844bd55d061b72022-12-21T18:11:58ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582006-04-016110610.1186/1471-2458-6-106Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening studyLow NicolaGraham AnnaSanford EmmaMills NicolaCampbell RonaPeters Tim J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The advent of urine testing for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>has raised the possibility of large-scale screening for this sexually transmitted infection, which is now the most common in the United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of an invitation to be screened for chlamydia and of receiving a negative result on levels of anxiety, depression and self-esteem.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>19,773 men and women aged 16 to 39 years, selected at random from 27 general practices in two large city areas (Bristol and Birmingham) were invited by post to send home-collected urine samples or vulvo-vaginal swabs for chlamydia testing. Questionnaires enquiring about anxiety, depression and self-esteem were sent to random samples of those offered screening: one month before the dispatch of invitations; when participants returned samples; and after receiving a negative result.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Home screening was associated with an overall reduction in anxiety scores. An invitation to participate did not increase anxiety levels. Anxiety scores in men were lower after receiving the invitation than at baseline. Amongst women anxiety was reduced after receipt of negative test results. Neither depression nor self-esteem scores were affected by screening.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Postal screening for chlamydia does not appear to have a negative impact on overall psychological well-being and can lead to a decrease in anxiety levels among respondents. There is, however, a clear difference between men and women in when this reduction occurs.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/106 |
| spellingShingle | Low Nicola Graham Anna Sanford Emma Mills Nicola Campbell Rona Peters Tim J Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study BMC Public Health |
| title | Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| title_full | Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| title_fullStr | Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| title_short | Does population screening for <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| title_sort | does population screening for it chlamydia trachomatis it raise anxiety among those tested findings from a population based chlamydia screening study |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/6/106 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lownicola doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy AT grahamanna doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy AT sanfordemma doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy AT millsnicola doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy AT campbellrona doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy AT peterstimj doespopulationscreeningforitchlamydiatrachomatisitraiseanxietyamongthosetestedfindingsfromapopulationbasedchlamydiascreeningstudy |