The financial independence of the Romanian Parliament
Romania is a unitary state and constitutional democracy organised under the principle of the separation of powers between the three branches of government – legislative, executive, and judicial – and the checks and balances between them. Since its creation in 1862, the Romanian Parliament has tradit...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bucharest University of Economic Studies
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Juridical Tribune |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An9v2/9.%20Vedinas,%20Condurache.pdf |
| Summary: | Romania is a unitary state and constitutional democracy organised under the principle of the separation of powers between the three branches of government – legislative, executive, and judicial – and the checks and balances between them. Since its creation in 1862, the Romanian Parliament has traditionally been a bicameral legislature, except during the communist era, a period during which it only had a single house. The desire to put an end to the top-down policies that characterised the communist era was an
impetus for Romanian voters to return the legislature to its former bicameralism by recasting the Romanian Parliament as a legislature composed of two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Senators and representatives are elected to four-year terms by universal suffrage in free, secret, and equal popular elections. Both representatives and senators are elected via the same voting mechanism, that is, by partylist proportional representation. The manner in which the two houses are organised and function, as well as their funding, is set out in the Constitution and in a number of legislative and regulatory texts. In a first part (1), this article will analyse the rules for
creating, implementing, and auditing the budgets of the two houses – which are the result of a patchwork of laws and regulations governing the Romanian Parliament – setting the
stage, in a second part (2) for the evaluation of the quantitative change in the two houses’ budgets, as well as the different ways of overseeing their spending. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2247-7195 2248-0382 |