The wrong horse was bet on: the effects of argument structure versus argument adjacency on the processing of idiomatic sentences
IntroductionPsycholinguistic research remains puzzled about the circumstances under which syntactically transformed idioms keep their figurative meaning. There is an abundance of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies that have examined which factors may determine why some idioms are more syntactic...
Main Authors: | Laura Reimer, Eva Smolka |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1123917/full |
Similar Items
-
DELVING THE HOOK SENTENCE IN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY: FINDING THE WRITERS’ PREFERENCES OF CATCHY SENTENCE
by: Yenni Arif Rahman
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Wh-Argument/Adjunct Asymmetry in Sentence Processing
by: Taylan Akal
Published: (2017-12-01) -
The Integration of Vocabulary and Effective Sentence Mastery towards Students’ Argumentative Writing Skills
by: Tien Rafida
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Prices are rising, wages are falling: Argument structure of verbs denoting ‘increase’ and ‘decrease’ in the Russian language
by: Valentina Y. Apresjan
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments
by: Michael Hoffmann, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)