Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species

Two species of the freshwater copepod genus Microcyclops are redescribed, M. finitimus Dussart, 1984, and M. minor Dussart, 1984 from type specimens. Redescription includes the microstructure of intercoxal sclerites and the basipodites of thoracic appendages, as well as the urosomal microstructure....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre, Adrián Cervantes-Martínez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2023-08-01
Series:ZooKeys
Online Access:https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/97827/download/pdf/
_version_ 1797753796868177920
author Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre
Adrián Cervantes-Martínez
author_facet Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre
Adrián Cervantes-Martínez
author_sort Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre
collection DOAJ
description Two species of the freshwater copepod genus Microcyclops are redescribed, M. finitimus Dussart, 1984, and M. minor Dussart, 1984 from type specimens. Redescription includes the microstructure of intercoxal sclerites and the basipodites of thoracic appendages, as well as the urosomal microstructure. According to the cluster (UPGMA and Euclidean distance) and PCA analyses performed, it was possible to improve the resolution between the American Microcyclops species by considering characters such as the distal region of antennal basis, the maxillary ornamentation, and the thoracic appendages, especially the intercoxal sclerites and medial margin of the basipodite of the first to fourth trunk limbs. Considering a set of 28 morphological characters in adult females, traditional features such as the length ratio of caudal rami, the length: width ratio of the third endopod of the fourth leg, or the length ratios between apical setae of the same segment, appear to be less important for defining differences between very similar species of American Microcyclops. In these analyses, the redescription of the Palearctic M. varicans was considered, and this species was clearly separated from the American M. dubitabilis Kiefer, 1934 and M. inarmatus Gutiérrez-Aguirre and Cervantes-Martínez, 2016.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:24:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1f8f5334d70341eb91b208242b5427a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1313-2970
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:24:08Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series ZooKeys
spelling doaj.art-1f8f5334d70341eb91b208242b5427a62023-08-05T08:11:04ZengPensoft PublishersZooKeys1313-29702023-08-01117311113010.3897/zookeys.1173.9782797827Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American speciesMartha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre0Adrián Cervantes-Martínez1Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana RooUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana RooTwo species of the freshwater copepod genus Microcyclops are redescribed, M. finitimus Dussart, 1984, and M. minor Dussart, 1984 from type specimens. Redescription includes the microstructure of intercoxal sclerites and the basipodites of thoracic appendages, as well as the urosomal microstructure. According to the cluster (UPGMA and Euclidean distance) and PCA analyses performed, it was possible to improve the resolution between the American Microcyclops species by considering characters such as the distal region of antennal basis, the maxillary ornamentation, and the thoracic appendages, especially the intercoxal sclerites and medial margin of the basipodite of the first to fourth trunk limbs. Considering a set of 28 morphological characters in adult females, traditional features such as the length ratio of caudal rami, the length: width ratio of the third endopod of the fourth leg, or the length ratios between apical setae of the same segment, appear to be less important for defining differences between very similar species of American Microcyclops. In these analyses, the redescription of the Palearctic M. varicans was considered, and this species was clearly separated from the American M. dubitabilis Kiefer, 1934 and M. inarmatus Gutiérrez-Aguirre and Cervantes-Martínez, 2016.https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/97827/download/pdf/
spellingShingle Martha Angélica Gutiérrez-Aguirre
Adrián Cervantes-Martínez
Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
ZooKeys
title Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
title_full Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
title_fullStr Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
title_full_unstemmed Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
title_short Redescription of two species of Microcyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) and use of ordination models to classify American species
title_sort redescription of two species of microcyclops copepoda cyclopoida and use of ordination models to classify american species
url https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/97827/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT marthaangelicagutierrezaguirre redescriptionoftwospeciesofmicrocyclopscopepodacyclopoidaanduseofordinationmodelstoclassifyamericanspecies
AT adriancervantesmartinez redescriptionoftwospeciesofmicrocyclopscopepodacyclopoidaanduseofordinationmodelstoclassifyamericanspecies