Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response

Abstract Several limitations of [18F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [11C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satoshi Nozaki, Yuka Nakatani, Aya Mawatari, Nina Shibata, William E. Hume, Emi Hayashinaka, Yasuhiro Wada, Hisashi Doi, Yasuyoshi Watanabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y
_version_ 1811171741333979136
author Satoshi Nozaki
Yuka Nakatani
Aya Mawatari
Nina Shibata
William E. Hume
Emi Hayashinaka
Yasuhiro Wada
Hisashi Doi
Yasuyoshi Watanabe
author_facet Satoshi Nozaki
Yuka Nakatani
Aya Mawatari
Nina Shibata
William E. Hume
Emi Hayashinaka
Yasuhiro Wada
Hisashi Doi
Yasuyoshi Watanabe
author_sort Satoshi Nozaki
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Several limitations of [18F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [11C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targets have been actively developed. [18F]FIMP was found to be highly accumulated in LAT1-positive tumors but not in inflamed tissue. The aim of this study was to explore whether [18F]FIMP can be used for the early-phase evaluation of radiotherapy accompanied by inflammation, and compare its effectiveness with those of [11C]MET and [18F]FDG. Tumor uptake of [18F]FIMP decreased at day 1 after irradiation, and remained low until day 14. Comparatively, that of [18F]FDG initially decreased at day 3 but was transiently elevated at day 7 and then decreased again at day 10. Decreased tumor uptake of [11C]MET was observed at day 10. In line with the uptake of [18F]FIMP, the ratio of Ki-67 immuno-positive cells in tumor tissues significantly decreased at day 1, 7, and 10 as compared with that in the control. These findings suggest that [18F]FIMP may be a PET probe involved in the early detection and prediction of radiotherapy efficacy, although further clarification is needed.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:19:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fa436ce421b40bf8d6b1229ce5c0cff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:19:06Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-1fa436ce421b40bf8d6b1229ce5c0cff2023-02-05T12:11:34ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-02-011311910.1038/s41598-023-29166-yComparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy responseSatoshi Nozaki0Yuka Nakatani1Aya Mawatari2Nina Shibata3William E. Hume4Emi Hayashinaka5Yasuhiro Wada6Hisashi Doi7Yasuyoshi Watanabe8Laboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Labeling Chemistry, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Labeling Chemistry, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchNovel PET Diagnostics Laboratory, RIKEN Innovation CenterLaboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Labeling Chemistry, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchLaboratory for Pathophysiological and Health Science, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchAbstract Several limitations of [18F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [11C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targets have been actively developed. [18F]FIMP was found to be highly accumulated in LAT1-positive tumors but not in inflamed tissue. The aim of this study was to explore whether [18F]FIMP can be used for the early-phase evaluation of radiotherapy accompanied by inflammation, and compare its effectiveness with those of [11C]MET and [18F]FDG. Tumor uptake of [18F]FIMP decreased at day 1 after irradiation, and remained low until day 14. Comparatively, that of [18F]FDG initially decreased at day 3 but was transiently elevated at day 7 and then decreased again at day 10. Decreased tumor uptake of [11C]MET was observed at day 10. In line with the uptake of [18F]FIMP, the ratio of Ki-67 immuno-positive cells in tumor tissues significantly decreased at day 1, 7, and 10 as compared with that in the control. These findings suggest that [18F]FIMP may be a PET probe involved in the early detection and prediction of radiotherapy efficacy, although further clarification is needed.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y
spellingShingle Satoshi Nozaki
Yuka Nakatani
Aya Mawatari
Nina Shibata
William E. Hume
Emi Hayashinaka
Yasuhiro Wada
Hisashi Doi
Yasuyoshi Watanabe
Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
title_full Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
title_fullStr Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
title_short Comparison of [18F]FIMP, [11C]MET, and [18F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
title_sort comparison of 18f fimp 11c met and 18f fdg pet for early phase assessment of radiotherapy response
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y
work_keys_str_mv AT satoshinozaki comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT yukanakatani comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT ayamawatari comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT ninashibata comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT williamehume comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT emihayashinaka comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT yasuhirowada comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT hisashidoi comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse
AT yasuyoshiwatanabe comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse