Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States

Offering relevant, evidence based continuing professional development (CPD) to ensure the continued competence of health professionals is a universal concern. This concern will become even more crucial in a world facing global health threats and in a context of internationalisation of learning envir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Depaigne-Loth, Laure Poirat, Jean-Philippe Natali, Michèle Lenoir-Salfati, Kate Regnier, Graham McMahon, Tamar Hosansky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of European CME
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2068215
_version_ 1817989035908399104
author Anne Depaigne-Loth
Laure Poirat
Jean-Philippe Natali
Michèle Lenoir-Salfati
Kate Regnier
Graham McMahon
Tamar Hosansky
author_facet Anne Depaigne-Loth
Laure Poirat
Jean-Philippe Natali
Michèle Lenoir-Salfati
Kate Regnier
Graham McMahon
Tamar Hosansky
author_sort Anne Depaigne-Loth
collection DOAJ
description Offering relevant, evidence based continuing professional development (CPD) to ensure the continued competence of health professionals is a universal concern. This concern will become even more crucial in a world facing global health threats and in a context of internationalisation of learning environments. While accrediting systems (i.e. external quality assurance systems for CPD) share a common goal to promote high quality CPD, each system is shaped by national history and contexts. An international movement is working to enhance the convergence of accrediting principles and processes. One of the first steps is to know and understand each other. This article serves this goal by offering a descriptive comparison of two seemingly different CPD quality assurance systems – in France and in the USA of America. The descriptions were developed by members of the accrediting bodies in both countries. The main finding of this descriptive study is that, despite stark differences in historical contexts and governance schemes, both regulators share principles of quality and independence of CPD and have endorsed a leadership role in promoting effective strategies, including interprofessional continuing education and practices. The commonalities of goals and values revealed in the study support the efforts of the International Academy for CPD Accreditation related to the globalisation of both health issues and learning environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:41:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fab74e76b83473d81902744b02c504f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2161-4083
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:41:15Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of European CME
spelling doaj.art-1fab74e76b83473d81902744b02c504f2022-12-22T02:22:10ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of European CME2161-40832022-12-0111110.1080/21614083.2022.2068215Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United StatesAnne Depaigne-Loth0Laure Poirat1Jean-Philippe Natali2Michèle Lenoir-Salfati3Kate Regnier4Graham McMahon5Tamar Hosansky6Agence nationale du Développement Professionnel Continu, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceAgence nationale du Développement Professionnel Continu, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceAgence nationale du Développement Professionnel Continu, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceAgence nationale du Développement Professionnel Continu, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceAccreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Chicago, Illinois, USAAccreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Chicago, Illinois, USAAccreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), Chicago, Illinois, USAOffering relevant, evidence based continuing professional development (CPD) to ensure the continued competence of health professionals is a universal concern. This concern will become even more crucial in a world facing global health threats and in a context of internationalisation of learning environments. While accrediting systems (i.e. external quality assurance systems for CPD) share a common goal to promote high quality CPD, each system is shaped by national history and contexts. An international movement is working to enhance the convergence of accrediting principles and processes. One of the first steps is to know and understand each other. This article serves this goal by offering a descriptive comparison of two seemingly different CPD quality assurance systems – in France and in the USA of America. The descriptions were developed by members of the accrediting bodies in both countries. The main finding of this descriptive study is that, despite stark differences in historical contexts and governance schemes, both regulators share principles of quality and independence of CPD and have endorsed a leadership role in promoting effective strategies, including interprofessional continuing education and practices. The commonalities of goals and values revealed in the study support the efforts of the International Academy for CPD Accreditation related to the globalisation of both health issues and learning environments.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2068215CPD accreditationinterprofessional continuing educationCPD qualityCPD independenceCPD and FranceUS CPD
spellingShingle Anne Depaigne-Loth
Laure Poirat
Jean-Philippe Natali
Michèle Lenoir-Salfati
Kate Regnier
Graham McMahon
Tamar Hosansky
Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
Journal of European CME
CPD accreditation
interprofessional continuing education
CPD quality
CPD independence
CPD and France
US CPD
title Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
title_full Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
title_fullStr Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
title_full_unstemmed Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
title_short Vive la Différence: A Comparison of CPD Quality Assurance Systems in France and The United States
title_sort vive la difference a comparison of cpd quality assurance systems in france and the united states
topic CPD accreditation
interprofessional continuing education
CPD quality
CPD independence
CPD and France
US CPD
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21614083.2022.2068215
work_keys_str_mv AT annedepaigneloth viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT laurepoirat viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT jeanphilippenatali viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT michelelenoirsalfati viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT kateregnier viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT grahammcmahon viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates
AT tamarhosansky viveladifferenceacomparisonofcpdqualityassurancesystemsinfranceandtheunitedstates