Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique

The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesús Mena-Álvarez, Juliette Theophanie Sevrain, Mario Zorita-García, Cristina Rico-Romano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270
_version_ 1797527711683444736
author Jesús Mena-Álvarez
Juliette Theophanie Sevrain
Mario Zorita-García
Cristina Rico-Romano
author_facet Jesús Mena-Álvarez
Juliette Theophanie Sevrain
Mario Zorita-García
Cristina Rico-Romano
author_sort Jesús Mena-Álvarez
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on the root canal sealer used (1: BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS, 2: GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal). They filled them with the continuous wave technique and submitted to a diaphanization technique. The samples were analyzed using a magnifying lens (20×), pictures were taken, which proceeded to linear measurement with the ImageJ<sup>®</sup> program and used a filling score system with five grades (0 to 4, 0 and 1 not acceptable, 2 to 4 acceptable); BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has got a greater proportion than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for SLC filled acceptably at 10 mm from the apex (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest proportion of SLC filled acceptably was found in the middle third (6 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), followed by the apical third (3 mm) and the coronal third (10 mm). The difference between apical and coronal third could be significant; BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has been better than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for filling SLC in the coronal third of the teeth. Studies on the characteristics of these cements are missing to explain these differences.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:46:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fabff55d9504cce9a09e5e5f23c15f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:46:40Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1fabff55d9504cce9a09e5e5f23c15f12023-11-22T03:06:55ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-07-011114627010.3390/app11146270Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha TechniqueJesús Mena-Álvarez0Juliette Theophanie Sevrain1Mario Zorita-García2Cristina Rico-Romano3Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainThe aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on the root canal sealer used (1: BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS, 2: GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal). They filled them with the continuous wave technique and submitted to a diaphanization technique. The samples were analyzed using a magnifying lens (20×), pictures were taken, which proceeded to linear measurement with the ImageJ<sup>®</sup> program and used a filling score system with five grades (0 to 4, 0 and 1 not acceptable, 2 to 4 acceptable); BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has got a greater proportion than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for SLC filled acceptably at 10 mm from the apex (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest proportion of SLC filled acceptably was found in the middle third (6 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), followed by the apical third (3 mm) and the coronal third (10 mm). The difference between apical and coronal third could be significant; BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has been better than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for filling SLC in the coronal third of the teeth. Studies on the characteristics of these cements are missing to explain these differences.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270bioceramicsroot canal sealerssimulated lateral canalswarm obturationextrusion
spellingShingle Jesús Mena-Álvarez
Juliette Theophanie Sevrain
Mario Zorita-García
Cristina Rico-Romano
Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
Applied Sciences
bioceramics
root canal sealers
simulated lateral canals
warm obturation
extrusion
title Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
title_sort comparative analysis of the filling capacity of simulated lateral canals of two bioactive root canal sealers using warm gutta percha technique
topic bioceramics
root canal sealers
simulated lateral canals
warm obturation
extrusion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270
work_keys_str_mv AT jesusmenaalvarez comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique
AT juliettetheophaniesevrain comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique
AT mariozoritagarcia comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique
AT cristinaricoromano comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique