Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique
The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270 |
_version_ | 1797527711683444736 |
---|---|
author | Jesús Mena-Álvarez Juliette Theophanie Sevrain Mario Zorita-García Cristina Rico-Romano |
author_facet | Jesús Mena-Álvarez Juliette Theophanie Sevrain Mario Zorita-García Cristina Rico-Romano |
author_sort | Jesús Mena-Álvarez |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on the root canal sealer used (1: BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS, 2: GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal). They filled them with the continuous wave technique and submitted to a diaphanization technique. The samples were analyzed using a magnifying lens (20×), pictures were taken, which proceeded to linear measurement with the ImageJ<sup>®</sup> program and used a filling score system with five grades (0 to 4, 0 and 1 not acceptable, 2 to 4 acceptable); BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has got a greater proportion than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for SLC filled acceptably at 10 mm from the apex (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest proportion of SLC filled acceptably was found in the middle third (6 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), followed by the apical third (3 mm) and the coronal third (10 mm). The difference between apical and coronal third could be significant; BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has been better than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for filling SLC in the coronal third of the teeth. Studies on the characteristics of these cements are missing to explain these differences. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:46:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1fabff55d9504cce9a09e5e5f23c15f1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3417 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T09:46:40Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Applied Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-1fabff55d9504cce9a09e5e5f23c15f12023-11-22T03:06:55ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-07-011114627010.3390/app11146270Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha TechniqueJesús Mena-Álvarez0Juliette Theophanie Sevrain1Mario Zorita-García2Cristina Rico-Romano3Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainThe aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo the sealing achieved at simulated lateral canals (SLC) and the quality of filling according to their position in the root canal after using the same filling technique. SLC were created at three levels in 55 teeth and divided into two groups depending on the root canal sealer used (1: BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS, 2: GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal). They filled them with the continuous wave technique and submitted to a diaphanization technique. The samples were analyzed using a magnifying lens (20×), pictures were taken, which proceeded to linear measurement with the ImageJ<sup>®</sup> program and used a filling score system with five grades (0 to 4, 0 and 1 not acceptable, 2 to 4 acceptable); BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has got a greater proportion than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for SLC filled acceptably at 10 mm from the apex (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The highest proportion of SLC filled acceptably was found in the middle third (6 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), followed by the apical third (3 mm) and the coronal third (10 mm). The difference between apical and coronal third could be significant; BioRoot<sup>®</sup> RCS has been better than GuttaFlow<sup>®</sup> bioseal for filling SLC in the coronal third of the teeth. Studies on the characteristics of these cements are missing to explain these differences.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270bioceramicsroot canal sealerssimulated lateral canalswarm obturationextrusion |
spellingShingle | Jesús Mena-Álvarez Juliette Theophanie Sevrain Mario Zorita-García Cristina Rico-Romano Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique Applied Sciences bioceramics root canal sealers simulated lateral canals warm obturation extrusion |
title | Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of the Filling Capacity of Simulated Lateral Canals of Two Bioactive Root Canal Sealers Using Warm Gutta-Percha Technique |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the filling capacity of simulated lateral canals of two bioactive root canal sealers using warm gutta percha technique |
topic | bioceramics root canal sealers simulated lateral canals warm obturation extrusion |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jesusmenaalvarez comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique AT juliettetheophaniesevrain comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique AT mariozoritagarcia comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique AT cristinaricoromano comparativeanalysisofthefillingcapacityofsimulatedlateralcanalsoftwobioactiverootcanalsealersusingwarmguttaperchatechnique |