Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Purpose To compare respiratory outcomes between less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) technique in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods We performed a retrospective medical chart review for 75 premature infants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hye Seon Kim, Hyun Ho Kim, Misun Yang, Yea Seul Han, Se In Sung, So Yoon Ahn, Yun Sil Chang, Won Soon Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Neonatology 2020-08-01
Series:Neonatal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.neo-med.org/upload/pdf/nm-2020-27-3-99.pdf
_version_ 1819277612690702336
author Hye Seon Kim
Hyun Ho Kim
Misun Yang
Yea Seul Han
Se In Sung
So Yoon Ahn
Yun Sil Chang
Won Soon Park
author_facet Hye Seon Kim
Hyun Ho Kim
Misun Yang
Yea Seul Han
Se In Sung
So Yoon Ahn
Yun Sil Chang
Won Soon Park
author_sort Hye Seon Kim
collection DOAJ
description Purpose To compare respiratory outcomes between less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) technique in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods We performed a retrospective medical chart review for 75 premature infants who were born at a gestational age (GA) of ≤34 weeks (between January 2017 and December 2019) and developed RDS after birth. Data on the demographic and outcome variables, including respiratory outcomes, were collected and compared between the infants who received LISA and those who received INSURE as a rescue therapy for RDS. Results No signifcant differences in GA, birth weight, and other demographic characteristics were found between the LISA and INSURE groups (GA: 28.7 weeks vs. 28.8 weeks, P=0.449; birth weight: 1,236 g vs. 1,124 g, P=0.714). At the delivery room, although the infants showed no significant difference in positive pressure ventilation rate after birth, the LISA group showed a higher rate of continuous positive airway pressure application than the INSURE group. The infants in the LISA group presented a higher risk of requiring multiple doses of surfactant for RDS than the infants in the INSURE group (57% vs. 17.5%, P=0.001). However, the duration of invasive and/or noninvasive respiratory support and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia showed no signifciant difference between the two groups. Conclusion In the present study, no significant differences in the incidence of inhospital respiratory outcomes such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia were found between the LISA and INSURE groups. These results suggest that LISA can be an alternative therapeutic option for treating RDS to avoid intubation and mechanical ventilation in premature infants.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T23:58:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fb3683178404bd29d75e636e042816f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2287-9412
2287-9803
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T23:58:53Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Korean Society of Neonatology
record_format Article
series Neonatal Medicine
spelling doaj.art-1fb3683178404bd29d75e636e042816f2022-12-21T17:25:10ZengKorean Society of NeonatologyNeonatal Medicine2287-94122287-98032020-08-012739910410.5385/nm.2020.27.3.991007Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress SyndromeHye Seon Kim0Hyun Ho Kim1Misun Yang2Yea Seul Han3Se In Sung4So Yoon Ahn5Yun Sil Chang6Won Soon Park7 Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaPurpose To compare respiratory outcomes between less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) technique in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods We performed a retrospective medical chart review for 75 premature infants who were born at a gestational age (GA) of ≤34 weeks (between January 2017 and December 2019) and developed RDS after birth. Data on the demographic and outcome variables, including respiratory outcomes, were collected and compared between the infants who received LISA and those who received INSURE as a rescue therapy for RDS. Results No signifcant differences in GA, birth weight, and other demographic characteristics were found between the LISA and INSURE groups (GA: 28.7 weeks vs. 28.8 weeks, P=0.449; birth weight: 1,236 g vs. 1,124 g, P=0.714). At the delivery room, although the infants showed no significant difference in positive pressure ventilation rate after birth, the LISA group showed a higher rate of continuous positive airway pressure application than the INSURE group. The infants in the LISA group presented a higher risk of requiring multiple doses of surfactant for RDS than the infants in the INSURE group (57% vs. 17.5%, P=0.001). However, the duration of invasive and/or noninvasive respiratory support and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia showed no signifciant difference between the two groups. Conclusion In the present study, no significant differences in the incidence of inhospital respiratory outcomes such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia were found between the LISA and INSURE groups. These results suggest that LISA can be an alternative therapeutic option for treating RDS to avoid intubation and mechanical ventilation in premature infants.http://www.neo-med.org/upload/pdf/nm-2020-27-3-99.pdfsurface-active agentsrespiratory distress syndrome in premature infants
spellingShingle Hye Seon Kim
Hyun Ho Kim
Misun Yang
Yea Seul Han
Se In Sung
So Yoon Ahn
Yun Sil Chang
Won Soon Park
Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Neonatal Medicine
surface-active agents
respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants
title Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short Comparison of Respiratory Outcomes between Less Invasive Surfactant Administration and the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation Technique in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort comparison of respiratory outcomes between less invasive surfactant administration and the intubation surfactant extubation technique in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
topic surface-active agents
respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants
url http://www.neo-med.org/upload/pdf/nm-2020-27-3-99.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hyeseonkim comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT hyunhokim comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT misunyang comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT yeaseulhan comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT seinsung comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT soyoonahn comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT yunsilchang comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT wonsoonpark comparisonofrespiratoryoutcomesbetweenlessinvasivesurfactantadministrationandtheintubationsurfactantextubationtechniqueinprematureinfantswithrespiratorydistresssyndrome