Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews
Abstract Aim To assess and describe reviews of nursing leadership styles associated with organizational, staff and patient outcomes. Design A systematic review of reviews. Methods Reviews describing a search strategy and quality assessment. The review followed the PRISMA statement. Nine databases we...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Nursing Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1876 |
| _version_ | 1827855313015930880 |
|---|---|
| author | Marja Hult Anja Terkamo‐Moisio Pirjo Kaakinen Suyen Karki Anu Nurmeksela Mira Palonen Laura‐Maria Peltonen Arja Häggman‐Laitila |
| author_facet | Marja Hult Anja Terkamo‐Moisio Pirjo Kaakinen Suyen Karki Anu Nurmeksela Mira Palonen Laura‐Maria Peltonen Arja Häggman‐Laitila |
| author_sort | Marja Hult |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Aim To assess and describe reviews of nursing leadership styles associated with organizational, staff and patient outcomes. Design A systematic review of reviews. Methods Reviews describing a search strategy and quality assessment. The review followed the PRISMA statement. Nine databases were searched in February 2022. Results After screening 6992 records, 12 reviews were included reporting 85 outcomes for 17 relational, nine task‐oriented, five passive and five destructive leadership styles. Transformational leadership, which is one of the relational styles, was the most studied among all the styles. Of the outcomes, staff outcomes were the most reported, notably job satisfaction, and patient outcomes were less reported. Also, mediating factors between relational leadership styles and staff and patient outcomes were identified. Conclusion Extensive research shows the beneficial impacts of relational leadership; however, destructive leadership research is lacking. Relational leadership styles should be conceptually assessed. More research is needed on how nurse leadership affects patients and organizations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:48:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1fbee934cc4349a0b6f7d851c2f4e620 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2054-1058 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T11:48:18Z |
| publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nursing Open |
| spelling | doaj.art-1fbee934cc4349a0b6f7d851c2f4e6202023-08-31T11:40:43ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582023-09-011095920593610.1002/nop2.1876Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviewsMarja Hult0Anja Terkamo‐Moisio1Pirjo Kaakinen2Suyen Karki3Anu Nurmeksela4Mira Palonen5Laura‐Maria Peltonen6Arja Häggman‐Laitila7Department of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandResearch unit of Nursing Science and Health Management University of Oulu Oulu FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science Tampere University Tampere FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science University of Turku Turku FinlandDepartment of Nursing Science University of Eastern Finland Kuopio FinlandAbstract Aim To assess and describe reviews of nursing leadership styles associated with organizational, staff and patient outcomes. Design A systematic review of reviews. Methods Reviews describing a search strategy and quality assessment. The review followed the PRISMA statement. Nine databases were searched in February 2022. Results After screening 6992 records, 12 reviews were included reporting 85 outcomes for 17 relational, nine task‐oriented, five passive and five destructive leadership styles. Transformational leadership, which is one of the relational styles, was the most studied among all the styles. Of the outcomes, staff outcomes were the most reported, notably job satisfaction, and patient outcomes were less reported. Also, mediating factors between relational leadership styles and staff and patient outcomes were identified. Conclusion Extensive research shows the beneficial impacts of relational leadership; however, destructive leadership research is lacking. Relational leadership styles should be conceptually assessed. More research is needed on how nurse leadership affects patients and organizations.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1876nurse outcomesnurse‐sensitive outcomesnursing management and leadershipnursing stafforganizational outcomespatient outcomes |
| spellingShingle | Marja Hult Anja Terkamo‐Moisio Pirjo Kaakinen Suyen Karki Anu Nurmeksela Mira Palonen Laura‐Maria Peltonen Arja Häggman‐Laitila Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews Nursing Open nurse outcomes nurse‐sensitive outcomes nursing management and leadership nursing staff organizational outcomes patient outcomes |
| title | Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews |
| title_full | Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews |
| title_fullStr | Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews |
| title_short | Relationships between nursing leadership and organizational, staff and patient outcomes: A systematic review of reviews |
| title_sort | relationships between nursing leadership and organizational staff and patient outcomes a systematic review of reviews |
| topic | nurse outcomes nurse‐sensitive outcomes nursing management and leadership nursing staff organizational outcomes patient outcomes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1876 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marjahult relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT anjaterkamomoisio relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT pirjokaakinen relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT suyenkarki relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT anunurmeksela relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT mirapalonen relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT lauramariapeltonen relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews AT arjahaggmanlaitila relationshipsbetweennursingleadershipandorganizationalstaffandpatientoutcomesasystematicreviewofreviews |