Beneficial Effects of IABP in Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Beneficial Effects of IABP in Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

<i>Background and Objectives</i>. Recent guidelines have downgraded the routine use of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite this, its use in clinical practice remains high. The aim of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Alberto Somaschini, Stefano Cornara, Sergio Leonardi, Andrea Demarchi, Alessandro Mandurino-Mirizzi, Federico Fortuni, Marco Ferlini, Gabriele Crimi, Rita Camporotondo, Massimiliano Gnecchi, Luigi Oltrona Visconti, Stefano De Servi, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:	Medicina
Subjects:	acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock mechanical circulatory support IABP
Online Access:	https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/59/10/1806

Similar Items

IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
by: Beatrice De Lazzari, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Computational Evaluation of IABP, Impella 2.5, TandemHeart and Combined IABP and Impella 2.5 Support in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Rahmi Alkan, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Cardiogenic shock — the current state of the problem
by: S. A. Boytsov, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Use of Impella device in cardiogenic shock and its clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Giuseppe Panuccio, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review
by: Johanna K. R. von Mackensen, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Case report: Combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump in a young male patient with refractory cardiogenic shock due to aluminum phosphide poisoning
by: Oleg Dukhin, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Cardiogenic shock - novelty and emerging therapeutic concepts
by: I. Petrov, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Comparison of the Efficacy of ECMO With or Without IABP in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis
by: Ping Zeng, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

Outcomes of Impella compared with intra-aortic balloon pump in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
by: Samarthkumar Thakkar, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Complications and Outcomes in 39,864 Patients Receiving Standard Care Plus Mechanical Circulatory Support or Standard Care Alone for Infarct-Associated Cardiogenic Shock
by: Jan-Sören Padberg, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Smoker’s paradox in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Role of inflammation and platelets
by: Alberto Somaschini, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01)

Modelling and Simulation of the Combined Use of IABP and Impella as a Rescue Procedure in Cardiogenic Shock: An Alternative for Non-Transplant Centres?
by: Beatrice De Lazzari, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)

A Comparative Study on Clinical Effects of Combined Auxiliary Sequence of VA-ECMO and IABP on Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock
by: CUI Xiaona, FENG Ruixia, HAN Yupeng, ZHOU Yaoyao, LIU Xiaojun, LI Jianchao
Published: (2023-12-01)

Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping Significantly Reduces Left Ventricular Pressure during Central Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation—Results from a Large Animal Model
by: Ilija Djordjevic, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Coincidence of Events Causing Paradoxical Hypotension in a Patient with an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
by: Muhammad Atif Masood Noori, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)

Case Report: USE OF INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP (IABP) IN HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION PROCEDURE
by: Yudi Her Oktaviono
Published: (2016-11-01)

Meta-analysis of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation only in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction
by: Max M. Meertens, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Favorable effect of glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitors among STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and incomplete ST resolution
by: Alberto Somaschini, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Mechanical Circulatory Support for Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
by: Agnė Jankuvienė, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock
by: Tara L. Jones, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing Impella CP Treatment vs. Standard of Care
by: Clemens Scherer, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Impact of Age on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
by: Manreet Kanwar, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Patient Characteristics, Treatment and Outcome in Non-Ischemic vs. Ischemic Cardiogenic Shock
by: Benedikt Schrage, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Mechanical Circulatory Device Utilization and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Andrew Adelsheimer, MD, MBA, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Optimal Antithrombotic Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Michal Droppa, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
by: Leonardo De Luca, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Impella to Treat Acute Myocardial Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
by: Jacob Eifer Møller, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

State of Shock: Contemporary Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in Cardiogenic Shock
by: Jason E. Bloom, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Temporal trends in incidence, causes, use of mechanical circulatory support and mortality in cardiogenic shock
by: Benedikt Schrage, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Defining levels of care in cardiogenic shock
by: Miguel Alvarez Villela, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Outcome of patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist device
by: Jean M. Haurand, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction—A Review
by: Sharon Bruoha, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes
by: Michael Abiragi, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Impact of the Timing of Mechanical Circulatory Support on the Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Subanalysis of the PREPARE CS Registry
by: Dan M. Prunea, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock: Execution Is Something; Timing Is Everything?
by: Ali J. Khiabani, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Does Intra-Aortic Balloon pump (IABP) improve hemodynamics in Asian Indian patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with cardiogenic Shock? (DIASTASIS study)
by: Kamal Sharma, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: Choosing the right mechanical circulatory support to improve outcomesCentral MessagePerspective
by: Olina Dagher, MD, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Case Report: A 42-year-old male with IABP developing multiple organ embolism and intestinal necrosis
by: Wanying Yang, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non–Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers
by: Joseph I. Wang, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Early Enteral Nutrition Tolerance in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support
by: Wen-jun Liu, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)