Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency

Abstract Background Sharing individual phenotype and genotype data between countries is complex and fraught with potential errors, while sharing summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is relatively straightforward, and thus would be especially useful for traits that are expensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunduimijid Bolormaa, Iona M. MacLeod, Majid Khansefid, Leah C. Marett, William J. Wales, Filippo Miglior, Christine F. Baes, Flavio S. Schenkel, Erin E. Connor, Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech, Paul Stothard, Emily Herman, Gert J. Nieuwhof, Michael E. Goddard, Jennie E. Pryce
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z
_version_ 1828735239038435328
author Sunduimijid Bolormaa
Iona M. MacLeod
Majid Khansefid
Leah C. Marett
William J. Wales
Filippo Miglior
Christine F. Baes
Flavio S. Schenkel
Erin E. Connor
Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech
Paul Stothard
Emily Herman
Gert J. Nieuwhof
Michael E. Goddard
Jennie E. Pryce
author_facet Sunduimijid Bolormaa
Iona M. MacLeod
Majid Khansefid
Leah C. Marett
William J. Wales
Filippo Miglior
Christine F. Baes
Flavio S. Schenkel
Erin E. Connor
Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech
Paul Stothard
Emily Herman
Gert J. Nieuwhof
Michael E. Goddard
Jennie E. Pryce
author_sort Sunduimijid Bolormaa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sharing individual phenotype and genotype data between countries is complex and fraught with potential errors, while sharing summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is relatively straightforward, and thus would be especially useful for traits that are expensive or difficult-to-measure, such as feed efficiency. Here we examined: (1) the sharing of individual cow data from international partners; and (2) the use of sequence variants selected from GWAS of international cow data to evaluate the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for residual feed intake (RFI) in Australian cows. Results GEBV for RFI were estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with 50k or high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from a training population of 3797 individuals in univariate to trivariate analyses where the three traits were RFI phenotypes calculated using 584 Australian lactating cows (AUSc), 824 growing heifers (AUSh), and 2526 international lactating cows (OVE). Accuracies of GEBV in AUSc were evaluated by either cohort-by-birth-year or fourfold random cross-validations. GEBV of AUSc were also predicted using only the AUS training population with a weighted genomic relationship matrix constructed with SNPs from the 50k array and sequence variants selected from a meta-GWAS that included only international datasets. The genomic heritabilities estimated using the AUSc, OVE and AUSh datasets were moderate, ranging from 0.20 to 0.36. The genetic correlations (rg) of traits between heifers and cows ranged from 0.30 to 0.95 but were associated with large standard errors. The mean accuracies of GEBV in Australian cows were up to 0.32 and almost doubled when either overseas cows, or both overseas cows and AUS heifers were included in the training population. They also increased when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNPs, but with a smaller relative increase. Conclusions The accuracy of RFI GEBV increased when international data were used or when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNP array data. This suggests that if direct sharing of data is not feasible, a meta-analysis of summary GWAS statistics could provide selected SNPs for custom panels to use in genomic selection programs. However, since this finding is based on a small cross-validation study, confirmation through a larger study is recommended.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fd8f15c792044cc9755c1186e0c3c46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1297-9686
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:04Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genetics Selection Evolution
spelling doaj.art-1fd8f15c792044cc9755c1186e0c3c462022-12-22T03:13:00ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution1297-96862022-09-0154111710.1186/s12711-022-00749-zSharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiencySunduimijid Bolormaa0Iona M. MacLeod1Majid Khansefid2Leah C. Marett3William J. Wales4Filippo Miglior5Christine F. Baes6Flavio S. Schenkel7Erin E. Connor8Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech9Paul Stothard10Emily Herman11Gert J. Nieuwhof12Michael E. Goddard13Jennie E. Pryce14Agriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAgriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAgriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAgriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank Centre, EllinbankAgriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank Centre, EllinbankLACTANETCGIL, University of GuelphCGIL, University of GuelphAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research CenterCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus UniversityFaculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of AlbertaFaculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of AlbertaAgriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAgriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAgriculture Victoria Research, AgribioAbstract Background Sharing individual phenotype and genotype data between countries is complex and fraught with potential errors, while sharing summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is relatively straightforward, and thus would be especially useful for traits that are expensive or difficult-to-measure, such as feed efficiency. Here we examined: (1) the sharing of individual cow data from international partners; and (2) the use of sequence variants selected from GWAS of international cow data to evaluate the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for residual feed intake (RFI) in Australian cows. Results GEBV for RFI were estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with 50k or high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from a training population of 3797 individuals in univariate to trivariate analyses where the three traits were RFI phenotypes calculated using 584 Australian lactating cows (AUSc), 824 growing heifers (AUSh), and 2526 international lactating cows (OVE). Accuracies of GEBV in AUSc were evaluated by either cohort-by-birth-year or fourfold random cross-validations. GEBV of AUSc were also predicted using only the AUS training population with a weighted genomic relationship matrix constructed with SNPs from the 50k array and sequence variants selected from a meta-GWAS that included only international datasets. The genomic heritabilities estimated using the AUSc, OVE and AUSh datasets were moderate, ranging from 0.20 to 0.36. The genetic correlations (rg) of traits between heifers and cows ranged from 0.30 to 0.95 but were associated with large standard errors. The mean accuracies of GEBV in Australian cows were up to 0.32 and almost doubled when either overseas cows, or both overseas cows and AUS heifers were included in the training population. They also increased when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNPs, but with a smaller relative increase. Conclusions The accuracy of RFI GEBV increased when international data were used or when selected sequence variants were combined with 50k SNP array data. This suggests that if direct sharing of data is not feasible, a meta-analysis of summary GWAS statistics could provide selected SNPs for custom panels to use in genomic selection programs. However, since this finding is based on a small cross-validation study, confirmation through a larger study is recommended.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z
spellingShingle Sunduimijid Bolormaa
Iona M. MacLeod
Majid Khansefid
Leah C. Marett
William J. Wales
Filippo Miglior
Christine F. Baes
Flavio S. Schenkel
Erin E. Connor
Coralia I. V. Manzanilla-Pech
Paul Stothard
Emily Herman
Gert J. Nieuwhof
Michael E. Goddard
Jennie E. Pryce
Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
Genetics Selection Evolution
title Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
title_full Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
title_fullStr Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
title_short Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
title_sort sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00749-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sunduimijidbolormaa sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT ionammacleod sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT majidkhansefid sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT leahcmarett sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT williamjwales sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT filippomiglior sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT christinefbaes sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT flaviosschenkel sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT erineconnor sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT coraliaivmanzanillapech sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT paulstothard sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT emilyherman sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT gertjnieuwhof sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT michaelegoddard sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency
AT jennieepryce sharingofeitherphenotypesorgeneticvariantscanincreasetheaccuracyofgenomicpredictionoffeedefficiency