Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios

This paper theme is the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological research, and in social sciences, in general, from the perspective of the multi-method approach – also designated as methodological triangulation. The argument presented here is that a multi-method approach i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabiana Luci de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2015-01-01
Series:Ciências Sociais Unisinos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93841498004
_version_ 1797250609908285440
author Fabiana Luci de Oliveira
author_facet Fabiana Luci de Oliveira
author_sort Fabiana Luci de Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description This paper theme is the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological research, and in social sciences, in general, from the perspective of the multi-method approach – also designated as methodological triangulation. The argument presented here is that a multi-method approach is one of the most complete forms of empirical research, once it combines the strength of large samples, and their ability to generalize, with the strength of case studies, and its ability to identify causal mechanisms. However, it presents many challenges in its implementation, especially when its goal is corroboration. From a review of the reference literature, I will indicate how these challenges can be overcome. I begin by specifying the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative methods, and of their combination (multi-method approach), pointing to the potentials and limitations in this combination, and I conclude describing two studies as examples: a classic research for excellence (Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste), in which Bourdieu (1977b) used a combination of methods to verify the determinants of cultural practices, and a more recent study (Corruption and inequality at the crossroad – a Multimethod Study of Bribery and Discrimination in Latin America), in which Fried et al. (2010) discuss the relationship between corruption and social inequality in Latin America, from an experiment followed by qualitative interviews as a way to better understand and explain the results of the experimental phase.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T20:30:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fdf2e8fe036437fac581c3872756912
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2177-6229
language Portuguese
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:49:06Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
record_format Article
series Ciências Sociais Unisinos
spelling doaj.art-1fdf2e8fe036437fac581c38727569122024-03-21T19:29:09ZporUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)Ciências Sociais Unisinos2177-62292015-01-01512133143Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafiosFabiana Luci de OliveiraThis paper theme is the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological research, and in social sciences, in general, from the perspective of the multi-method approach – also designated as methodological triangulation. The argument presented here is that a multi-method approach is one of the most complete forms of empirical research, once it combines the strength of large samples, and their ability to generalize, with the strength of case studies, and its ability to identify causal mechanisms. However, it presents many challenges in its implementation, especially when its goal is corroboration. From a review of the reference literature, I will indicate how these challenges can be overcome. I begin by specifying the characteristics of quantitative and qualitative methods, and of their combination (multi-method approach), pointing to the potentials and limitations in this combination, and I conclude describing two studies as examples: a classic research for excellence (Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste), in which Bourdieu (1977b) used a combination of methods to verify the determinants of cultural practices, and a more recent study (Corruption and inequality at the crossroad – a Multimethod Study of Bribery and Discrimination in Latin America), in which Fried et al. (2010) discuss the relationship between corruption and social inequality in Latin America, from an experiment followed by qualitative interviews as a way to better understand and explain the results of the experimental phase.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93841498004quantitative and qualitative methodstriangulationmultimethod (or mixed methods)
spellingShingle Fabiana Luci de Oliveira
Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
Ciências Sociais Unisinos
quantitative and qualitative methods
triangulation
multi
method (or mixed methods)
title Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
title_full Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
title_fullStr Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
title_full_unstemmed Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
title_short Triangulação metodológica e abordagem multimétodo na pesquisa sociológica: vantagens e desafios
title_sort triangulacao metodologica e abordagem multimetodo na pesquisa sociologica vantagens e desafios
topic quantitative and qualitative methods
triangulation
multi
method (or mixed methods)
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93841498004
work_keys_str_mv AT fabianalucideoliveira triangulacaometodologicaeabordagemmultimetodonapesquisasociologicavantagensedesafios