Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseus membrane (IOM) predicts residual symptoms in ankle sprains. Limited kinematic knowledge of the tibiofibular joint resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conor Murphy MD, Thomas Pfeiffer MD, Jason Zlotnicki MD, Volker Musahl MD, Richard Debski PhD, MaCalus Hogan MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-09-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000303
_version_ 1818313482932584448
author Conor Murphy MD
Thomas Pfeiffer MD
Jason Zlotnicki MD
Volker Musahl MD
Richard Debski PhD
MaCalus Hogan MD
author_facet Conor Murphy MD
Thomas Pfeiffer MD
Jason Zlotnicki MD
Volker Musahl MD
Richard Debski PhD
MaCalus Hogan MD
author_sort Conor Murphy MD
collection DOAJ
description Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseus membrane (IOM) predicts residual symptoms in ankle sprains. Limited kinematic knowledge of the tibiofibular joint results in missed diagnosis and poor clinical outcomes. Lateral fibular displacement on radiologic assessment signifies syndesmotic disruption which dictates operative management. Previous studies demonstrated that fibular motion is multiplanar after injury. The objective of this study is to determine increases in fibular motion with sequential syndesmotic injury and the contribution of the AITFL. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibial plateau-to-toe specimens with a mean age of 58 years (range 38-73 years) were tested using a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed. The subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The motion of the fibula was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) during each applied moment and flexion angle in the following conditions: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected. Statistical analysis included an ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis to compare the changes in fibular motion between the intact and injury models at each applied moment and flexion angle (*p<0.05). Results: The only significant differences in fibular motion were during the 5 Nm inversion moment. The posterior translation of the fibula was significantly greater with AITFL injury compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30° plantarflexion. Significant increases in posterior translation between the intact ankle and AITFL, PITFL, and IOM injury existed at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion. No significant motion differences were observed between the AITFL injury and combined injury at any condition. When comparing the intact ankle and combined injury, significant increases in ER existed at 0° and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The only significant difference in ER between the intact ankle and AITFL injury existed at 0° plantarflexion. Conclusion: This study showed that transecting the AITFL resulted in the largest increases in fibular motion with only minimal further increases after complete syndesmotic injury. Fibular displacement was primarily in the sagittal plane. This study utilized a novel setup with unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Measuring ML translation alone could underestimate sagittal and rotational instability of the syndesmosis in AITFL injuries. Evaluating fibular AP translation and ER are not part of current standard diagnostic protocols. Physicians may consider more aggressive treatment of isolated AITFL injuries.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:34:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1fe10e4afa224854b466ecf418047a23
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:34:27Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-1fe10e4afa224854b466ecf418047a232022-12-21T23:53:40ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142017-09-01210.1177/2473011417S000303Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the SyndesmosisConor Murphy MDThomas Pfeiffer MDJason Zlotnicki MDVolker Musahl MDRichard Debski PhDMaCalus Hogan MDCategory: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Injury to the Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseus membrane (IOM) predicts residual symptoms in ankle sprains. Limited kinematic knowledge of the tibiofibular joint results in missed diagnosis and poor clinical outcomes. Lateral fibular displacement on radiologic assessment signifies syndesmotic disruption which dictates operative management. Previous studies demonstrated that fibular motion is multiplanar after injury. The objective of this study is to determine increases in fibular motion with sequential syndesmotic injury and the contribution of the AITFL. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibial plateau-to-toe specimens with a mean age of 58 years (range 38-73 years) were tested using a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed. The subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. A 5 Nm external rotation and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The motion of the fibula was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) during each applied moment and flexion angle in the following conditions: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected. Statistical analysis included an ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis to compare the changes in fibular motion between the intact and injury models at each applied moment and flexion angle (*p<0.05). Results: The only significant differences in fibular motion were during the 5 Nm inversion moment. The posterior translation of the fibula was significantly greater with AITFL injury compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30° plantarflexion. Significant increases in posterior translation between the intact ankle and AITFL, PITFL, and IOM injury existed at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion. No significant motion differences were observed between the AITFL injury and combined injury at any condition. When comparing the intact ankle and combined injury, significant increases in ER existed at 0° and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. The only significant difference in ER between the intact ankle and AITFL injury existed at 0° plantarflexion. Conclusion: This study showed that transecting the AITFL resulted in the largest increases in fibular motion with only minimal further increases after complete syndesmotic injury. Fibular displacement was primarily in the sagittal plane. This study utilized a novel setup with unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Measuring ML translation alone could underestimate sagittal and rotational instability of the syndesmosis in AITFL injuries. Evaluating fibular AP translation and ER are not part of current standard diagnostic protocols. Physicians may consider more aggressive treatment of isolated AITFL injuries.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000303
spellingShingle Conor Murphy MD
Thomas Pfeiffer MD
Jason Zlotnicki MD
Volker Musahl MD
Richard Debski PhD
MaCalus Hogan MD
Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
title_full Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
title_fullStr Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
title_full_unstemmed Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
title_short Anterior-Posterior Translation and Axial Rotation of the Fibula are Significantly Increased with Sequential Disruption of the Syndesmosis
title_sort anterior posterior translation and axial rotation of the fibula are significantly increased with sequential disruption of the syndesmosis
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000303
work_keys_str_mv AT conormurphymd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis
AT thomaspfeiffermd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis
AT jasonzlotnickimd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis
AT volkermusahlmd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis
AT richarddebskiphd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis
AT macalushoganmd anteriorposteriortranslationandaxialrotationofthefibulaaresignificantlyincreasedwithsequentialdisruptionofthesyndesmosis