The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas

This article examines, from a legal perspective, the Lisbon Treaty changes over the European Union’s (EU) common agricultural policy (CAP) and their impact on developing countries. The study focuses particularly on the Caribbean region of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP group), which signed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vanessa Constant LaForce
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2014-05-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/486
_version_ 1811294667672649728
author Vanessa Constant LaForce
author_facet Vanessa Constant LaForce
author_sort Vanessa Constant LaForce
collection DOAJ
description This article examines, from a legal perspective, the Lisbon Treaty changes over the European Union’s (EU) common agricultural policy (CAP) and their impact on developing countries. The study focuses particularly on the Caribbean region of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP group), which signed an Economic Partnership Agreement with the EU in 2008, and will use bananas as the exemplar commodity. The Lisbon Treaty which entered into force in December 2009 has brought important institutional changes within the EU and altered the distribution of responsibility over European policies. The European Parliament (EP) now exercises legislative functions ‘jointly’ with the Council over fields falling outside EU trade policy but which often have trade-related impacts. This is the case of the CAP which is now a shared rather than an exclusive competence policy area. The EU is an important market for developing countries’ export of agricultural food products. However, there is a risk that the EP positions, pressured by consumer opinion, could influence the negotiating process leading to the reinforcement of the EU’s protectionist agriculture policy. This subject is of high importance given the end of the so-called ‘banana war’ in 2009 against the EU banana import regime, allowing better access for Latin American countries’ bananas to the EU market. This article argues that ACP countries will not be affected by the EU internal changes post-Lisbon. They have managed to legally maintain special trade arrangements with the EU under the Economic Partnership Agreements, which provide them with favourable trading conditions, particularly for agricultural food products.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:20:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2003db2561564f7dbe831a9f81791c86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1815-347X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:20:51Z
publishDate 2014-05-01
publisher UACES
record_format Article
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
spelling doaj.art-2003db2561564f7dbe831a9f81791c862022-12-22T03:00:46ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2014-05-01102The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of BananasVanessa Constant LaForce0University of Abertay Dundee Dundee Business School, Division of Law Bell Street, DD1 1HG Dundee (Scotland)This article examines, from a legal perspective, the Lisbon Treaty changes over the European Union’s (EU) common agricultural policy (CAP) and their impact on developing countries. The study focuses particularly on the Caribbean region of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP group), which signed an Economic Partnership Agreement with the EU in 2008, and will use bananas as the exemplar commodity. The Lisbon Treaty which entered into force in December 2009 has brought important institutional changes within the EU and altered the distribution of responsibility over European policies. The European Parliament (EP) now exercises legislative functions ‘jointly’ with the Council over fields falling outside EU trade policy but which often have trade-related impacts. This is the case of the CAP which is now a shared rather than an exclusive competence policy area. The EU is an important market for developing countries’ export of agricultural food products. However, there is a risk that the EP positions, pressured by consumer opinion, could influence the negotiating process leading to the reinforcement of the EU’s protectionist agriculture policy. This subject is of high importance given the end of the so-called ‘banana war’ in 2009 against the EU banana import regime, allowing better access for Latin American countries’ bananas to the EU market. This article argues that ACP countries will not be affected by the EU internal changes post-Lisbon. They have managed to legally maintain special trade arrangements with the EU under the Economic Partnership Agreements, which provide them with favourable trading conditions, particularly for agricultural food products.https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/486Lisbon TreatyCommon Agricultural PolicyCaribbean countriesEconomic Partnership AgreementAgricultural tradeBananas
spellingShingle Vanessa Constant LaForce
The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
Journal of Contemporary European Research
Lisbon Treaty
Common Agricultural Policy
Caribbean countries
Economic Partnership Agreement
Agricultural trade
Bananas
title The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
title_full The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
title_fullStr The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
title_full_unstemmed The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
title_short The EU-Caribbean Trade Relationship Post-Lisbon: The Case of Bananas
title_sort eu caribbean trade relationship post lisbon the case of bananas
topic Lisbon Treaty
Common Agricultural Policy
Caribbean countries
Economic Partnership Agreement
Agricultural trade
Bananas
url https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/486
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessaconstantlaforce theeucaribbeantraderelationshippostlisbonthecaseofbananas
AT vanessaconstantlaforce eucaribbeantraderelationshippostlisbonthecaseofbananas