Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study

In this study, the motion therapy elements necessary for student education were clarified through comparison of the therapeutic motion techniques of therapists and students using an educational arm robot (Samothrace: SAMO). Eight therapists and 25 fourth-year students participated. The therapeutic m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koike Yuji, Okino Akihisa, Takeda Kazuhisa, Takanami Yasuhiro, Toyohiro Hamaguchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/20/9403
_version_ 1827680232167964672
author Koike Yuji
Okino Akihisa
Takeda Kazuhisa
Takanami Yasuhiro
Toyohiro Hamaguchi
author_facet Koike Yuji
Okino Akihisa
Takeda Kazuhisa
Takanami Yasuhiro
Toyohiro Hamaguchi
author_sort Koike Yuji
collection DOAJ
description In this study, the motion therapy elements necessary for student education were clarified through comparison of the therapeutic motion techniques of therapists and students using an educational arm robot (Samothrace: SAMO). Eight therapists and 25 fourth-year students participated. The therapeutic motion therapy task was a reciprocating exercise in which the elbow joint of SAMO was flexed from an extended position and then re-extended. This was performed for three types of muscle tone intensities (mild, moderate, and severe), and the peak velocity, angle ratio, velocity time, and movement time were recorded using SAMO. These data were then compared using analysis of covariance. It was found that the SAMO elbow joint kinematic data generated by therapists differed significantly from those of students for different muscle tones. Multiple comparisons showed that the therapeutic motion techniques of students were associated with a higher peak velocity, smaller peak angle ratio, and shorter peak velocity time and movement time than those of the therapists. Thus, when students learn therapeutic motion techniques, they should be taught to (1) deal with multiple muscle tone intensities and (2) reduce the joint movement speed applied to the patient to extend the exercise time and ensure maximum joint movement range.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:45:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20053e9cfc1b457f8eeef4e3bd93b93d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:45:04Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-20053e9cfc1b457f8eeef4e3bd93b93d2023-11-22T17:18:00ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-10-011120940310.3390/app11209403Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility StudyKoike Yuji0Okino Akihisa1Takeda Kazuhisa2Takanami Yasuhiro3Toyohiro Hamaguchi4Department of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya 3438540, JapanOkino Robotics Industries, Ltd., Kamikawa 3670241, JapanOkino Robotics Industries, Ltd., Kamikawa 3670241, JapanPeritec Corporation, Takasaki 3700862, JapanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya 3438540, JapanIn this study, the motion therapy elements necessary for student education were clarified through comparison of the therapeutic motion techniques of therapists and students using an educational arm robot (Samothrace: SAMO). Eight therapists and 25 fourth-year students participated. The therapeutic motion therapy task was a reciprocating exercise in which the elbow joint of SAMO was flexed from an extended position and then re-extended. This was performed for three types of muscle tone intensities (mild, moderate, and severe), and the peak velocity, angle ratio, velocity time, and movement time were recorded using SAMO. These data were then compared using analysis of covariance. It was found that the SAMO elbow joint kinematic data generated by therapists differed significantly from those of students for different muscle tones. Multiple comparisons showed that the therapeutic motion techniques of students were associated with a higher peak velocity, smaller peak angle ratio, and shorter peak velocity time and movement time than those of the therapists. Thus, when students learn therapeutic motion techniques, they should be taught to (1) deal with multiple muscle tone intensities and (2) reduce the joint movement speed applied to the patient to extend the exercise time and ensure maximum joint movement range.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/20/9403patient robotoccupational therapy trainingspasticityrehabilitationtherapeutic motion techniquesexercise therapy education
spellingShingle Koike Yuji
Okino Akihisa
Takeda Kazuhisa
Takanami Yasuhiro
Toyohiro Hamaguchi
Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
Applied Sciences
patient robot
occupational therapy training
spasticity
rehabilitation
therapeutic motion techniques
exercise therapy education
title Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
title_full Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
title_short Comparison of Manipulative Indicators of Students and Therapists Using a Robotic Arm: A Feasibility Study
title_sort comparison of manipulative indicators of students and therapists using a robotic arm a feasibility study
topic patient robot
occupational therapy training
spasticity
rehabilitation
therapeutic motion techniques
exercise therapy education
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/20/9403
work_keys_str_mv AT koikeyuji comparisonofmanipulativeindicatorsofstudentsandtherapistsusingaroboticarmafeasibilitystudy
AT okinoakihisa comparisonofmanipulativeindicatorsofstudentsandtherapistsusingaroboticarmafeasibilitystudy
AT takedakazuhisa comparisonofmanipulativeindicatorsofstudentsandtherapistsusingaroboticarmafeasibilitystudy
AT takanamiyasuhiro comparisonofmanipulativeindicatorsofstudentsandtherapistsusingaroboticarmafeasibilitystudy
AT toyohirohamaguchi comparisonofmanipulativeindicatorsofstudentsandtherapistsusingaroboticarmafeasibilitystudy