Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review
BackgroundTechnological advances have transformed vascular intervention in recent decades. In particular, improvements in imaging and data processing have allowed for the development of increasingly complex endovascular and hybrid interventions. Augmented reality (AR) is a su...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Serious Games |
| Online Access: | https://games.jmir.org/2022/3/e34501 |
| _version_ | 1797734695474036736 |
|---|---|
| author | Joshua Eves Abhilash Sudarsanam Joseph Shalhoub Dimitri Amiras |
| author_facet | Joshua Eves Abhilash Sudarsanam Joseph Shalhoub Dimitri Amiras |
| author_sort | Joshua Eves |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundTechnological advances have transformed vascular intervention in recent decades. In particular, improvements in imaging and data processing have allowed for the development of increasingly complex endovascular and hybrid interventions. Augmented reality (AR) is a subject of growing interest in surgery, with the potential to improve clinicians’ understanding of 3D anatomy and aid in the processing of real-time information. This study hopes to elucidate the potential impact of AR technology in the rapidly evolving fields of vascular and endovascular surgery.
ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to summarize the fundamental concepts of AR technologies and conduct a scoping review of the impact of AR and mixed reality in vascular and endovascular surgery.
MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All studies written in English from inception until January 8, 2021, were included in the search. Combinations of the following keywords were used in the systematic search string: (“augmented reality” OR “hololens” OR “image overlay” OR “daqri” OR “magic leap” OR “immersive reality” OR “extended reality” OR “mixed reality” OR “head mounted display”) AND (“vascular surgery” OR “endovascular”). Studies were selected through a blinded process between 2 investigators (JE and AS) and assessed using data quality tools.
ResultsAR technologies have had a number of applications in vascular and endovascular surgery. Most studies (22/32, 69%) used 3D imaging of computed tomography angiogram–derived images of vascular anatomy to augment clinicians’ anatomical understanding during procedures. A wide range of AR technologies were used, with heads up fusion imaging and AR head-mounted displays being the most commonly applied clinically. AR applications included guiding open, robotic, and endovascular surgery while minimizing dissection, improving procedural times, and reducing radiation and contrast exposure.
ConclusionsAR has shown promising developments in the field of vascular and endovascular surgery, with potential benefits to surgeons and patients alike. These include reductions in patient risk and operating times as well as in contrast and radiation exposure for radiological interventions. Further technological advances are required to overcome current limitations, including processing capacity and vascular deformation by instrumentation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:48:07Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-200c4adfe40c4d378c10466b3a764999 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2291-9279 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:48:07Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Serious Games |
| spelling | doaj.art-200c4adfe40c4d378c10466b3a7649992023-08-28T23:07:39ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Serious Games2291-92792022-09-01103e3450110.2196/34501Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping ReviewJoshua Eveshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7165-4659Abhilash Sudarsanamhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-4191Joseph Shalhoubhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-7440Dimitri Amirashttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-0048 BackgroundTechnological advances have transformed vascular intervention in recent decades. In particular, improvements in imaging and data processing have allowed for the development of increasingly complex endovascular and hybrid interventions. Augmented reality (AR) is a subject of growing interest in surgery, with the potential to improve clinicians’ understanding of 3D anatomy and aid in the processing of real-time information. This study hopes to elucidate the potential impact of AR technology in the rapidly evolving fields of vascular and endovascular surgery. ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to summarize the fundamental concepts of AR technologies and conduct a scoping review of the impact of AR and mixed reality in vascular and endovascular surgery. MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All studies written in English from inception until January 8, 2021, were included in the search. Combinations of the following keywords were used in the systematic search string: (“augmented reality” OR “hololens” OR “image overlay” OR “daqri” OR “magic leap” OR “immersive reality” OR “extended reality” OR “mixed reality” OR “head mounted display”) AND (“vascular surgery” OR “endovascular”). Studies were selected through a blinded process between 2 investigators (JE and AS) and assessed using data quality tools. ResultsAR technologies have had a number of applications in vascular and endovascular surgery. Most studies (22/32, 69%) used 3D imaging of computed tomography angiogram–derived images of vascular anatomy to augment clinicians’ anatomical understanding during procedures. A wide range of AR technologies were used, with heads up fusion imaging and AR head-mounted displays being the most commonly applied clinically. AR applications included guiding open, robotic, and endovascular surgery while minimizing dissection, improving procedural times, and reducing radiation and contrast exposure. ConclusionsAR has shown promising developments in the field of vascular and endovascular surgery, with potential benefits to surgeons and patients alike. These include reductions in patient risk and operating times as well as in contrast and radiation exposure for radiological interventions. Further technological advances are required to overcome current limitations, including processing capacity and vascular deformation by instrumentation.https://games.jmir.org/2022/3/e34501 |
| spellingShingle | Joshua Eves Abhilash Sudarsanam Joseph Shalhoub Dimitri Amiras Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review JMIR Serious Games |
| title | Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review |
| title_full | Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review |
| title_fullStr | Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review |
| title_short | Augmented Reality in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Scoping Review |
| title_sort | augmented reality in vascular and endovascular surgery scoping review |
| url | https://games.jmir.org/2022/3/e34501 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joshuaeves augmentedrealityinvascularandendovascularsurgeryscopingreview AT abhilashsudarsanam augmentedrealityinvascularandendovascularsurgeryscopingreview AT josephshalhoub augmentedrealityinvascularandendovascularsurgeryscopingreview AT dimitriamiras augmentedrealityinvascularandendovascularsurgeryscopingreview |