Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)

Abstract Genetically modified maize DP202216 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate‐ammonium‐containing herbicides and to provide an opportunity for yield enhancement under field conditions. These properties were achieved by introducing the mo‐pat and zmm28 expression cassettes. The molecu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Ewen Mullins, Jean‐Louis Bresson, Tamas Dalmay, Ian Crawford Dewhurst, Michelle M. Epstein, Leslie George Firbank, Philippe Guerche, Jan Hejatko, Francisco Javier Moreno, Hanspeter Naegeli, Fabien Nogué, Nils Rostoks, Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano, Giovanni Savoini, Eve Veromann, Fabio Veronesi, Michele Ardizzone, Ana M. Camargo, Giacomo De Sanctis, Silvia Federici, Antonio Fernandez, Andrea Gennaro, José Ángel Gómez Ruiz, Tilemachos Goumperis, Paschalina Grammatikou, Dafni Maria Kagkli, Paolo Lenzi, Franco Maria Neri, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Tommaso Raffaello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-03-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8655
_version_ 1797235658142515200
author EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Ewen Mullins
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michelle M. Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Hanspeter Naegeli
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Michele Ardizzone
Ana M. Camargo
Giacomo De Sanctis
Silvia Federici
Antonio Fernandez
Andrea Gennaro
José Ángel Gómez Ruiz
Tilemachos Goumperis
Paschalina Grammatikou
Dafni Maria Kagkli
Paolo Lenzi
Franco Maria Neri
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Tommaso Raffaello
author_facet EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Ewen Mullins
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michelle M. Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Hanspeter Naegeli
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Michele Ardizzone
Ana M. Camargo
Giacomo De Sanctis
Silvia Federici
Antonio Fernandez
Andrea Gennaro
José Ángel Gómez Ruiz
Tilemachos Goumperis
Paschalina Grammatikou
Dafni Maria Kagkli
Paolo Lenzi
Franco Maria Neri
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Tommaso Raffaello
author_sort EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Genetically modified maize DP202216 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate‐ammonium‐containing herbicides and to provide an opportunity for yield enhancement under field conditions. These properties were achieved by introducing the mo‐pat and zmm28 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP202216 and its comparator needs further assessment, except for the levels of stearic acid (C18:0), which do not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT and ZMM28 proteins as expressed in maize DP202216, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DP202216. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP202216 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as the comparator and non‐GM reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP202216 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP202216. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as its comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:51:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2031338508bf45fa9262c2920869e373
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:51:27Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-2031338508bf45fa9262c2920869e3732024-03-29T03:10:39ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322024-03-01223n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8655Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Ewen MullinsJean‐Louis BressonTamas DalmayIan Crawford DewhurstMichelle M. EpsteinLeslie George FirbankPhilippe GuercheJan HejatkoFrancisco Javier MorenoHanspeter NaegeliFabien NoguéNils RostoksJose Juan Sánchez SerranoGiovanni SavoiniEve VeromannFabio VeronesiMichele ArdizzoneAna M. CamargoGiacomo De SanctisSilvia FedericiAntonio FernandezAndrea GennaroJosé Ángel Gómez RuizTilemachos GoumperisPaschalina GrammatikouDafni Maria KagkliPaolo LenziFranco Maria NeriNikoletta PapadopoulouTommaso RaffaelloAbstract Genetically modified maize DP202216 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate‐ammonium‐containing herbicides and to provide an opportunity for yield enhancement under field conditions. These properties were achieved by introducing the mo‐pat and zmm28 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP202216 and its comparator needs further assessment, except for the levels of stearic acid (C18:0), which do not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the PAT and ZMM28 proteins as expressed in maize DP202216, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize DP202216. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP202216 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as the comparator and non‐GM reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP202216 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP202216. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP202216 is as safe as its comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8655DP202216genetic engineeringGMimport and processingmaize (Zea mays)PAT
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
Ewen Mullins
Jean‐Louis Bresson
Tamas Dalmay
Ian Crawford Dewhurst
Michelle M. Epstein
Leslie George Firbank
Philippe Guerche
Jan Hejatko
Francisco Javier Moreno
Hanspeter Naegeli
Fabien Nogué
Nils Rostoks
Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano
Giovanni Savoini
Eve Veromann
Fabio Veronesi
Michele Ardizzone
Ana M. Camargo
Giacomo De Sanctis
Silvia Federici
Antonio Fernandez
Andrea Gennaro
José Ángel Gómez Ruiz
Tilemachos Goumperis
Paschalina Grammatikou
Dafni Maria Kagkli
Paolo Lenzi
Franco Maria Neri
Nikoletta Papadopoulou
Tommaso Raffaello
Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
EFSA Journal
DP202216
genetic engineering
GM
import and processing
maize (Zea mays)
PAT
title Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize DP202216 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐159)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize dp202216 for food and feed uses under regulation ec no 1829 2003 application efsa gmo nl 2019 159
topic DP202216
genetic engineering
GM
import and processing
maize (Zea mays)
PAT
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8655
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsgmo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT ewenmullins assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT jeanlouisbresson assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT tamasdalmay assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT iancrawforddewhurst assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT michellemepstein assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT lesliegeorgefirbank assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT philippeguerche assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT janhejatko assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT franciscojaviermoreno assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT hanspeternaegeli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT fabiennogue assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT nilsrostoks assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT josejuansanchezserrano assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT giovannisavoini assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT eveveromann assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT fabioveronesi assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT micheleardizzone assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT anamcamargo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT giacomodesanctis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT silviafederici assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT antoniofernandez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT andreagennaro assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT joseangelgomezruiz assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT tilemachosgoumperis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT paschalinagrammatikou assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT dafnimariakagkli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT paololenzi assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT francomarianeri assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT nikolettapapadopoulou assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159
AT tommasoraffaello assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizedp202216forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019159