Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN
The last decade has transformed wireless access technologies and crystallized a new direction for the internet of things (IoT). The modern low-power wide-area network (LPWAN) technologies have been introduced to deliver connectivity for billions of devices while keeping the costs and consumption low...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/2042 |
_version_ | 1797473639753318400 |
---|---|
author | Radek Fujdiak Konstantin Mikhaylov Jan Pospisil Ales Povalac Jiri Misurec |
author_facet | Radek Fujdiak Konstantin Mikhaylov Jan Pospisil Ales Povalac Jiri Misurec |
author_sort | Radek Fujdiak |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The last decade has transformed wireless access technologies and crystallized a new direction for the internet of things (IoT). The modern low-power wide-area network (LPWAN) technologies have been introduced to deliver connectivity for billions of devices while keeping the costs and consumption low, and the range of communication high. While the 5G (fifth generation mobile network) LPWAN-like radio technologies, namely NB-IoT (narrowband internet of things) and LTE-M (long-term evolution machine type communication) are emerging, the long-range wide-area network (LoRaWAN) remains extremely popular. One unique feature of this technology, which distinguishes it from the competitors, is the possibility of supporting both public and private network deployments. In this paper we focus on this aspect and deliver original results comparing the performance of the private and public LoRAWAN deployment options; these results should help understand the LoRaWAN technology and give a clear overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the private versus public approaches. Notably, we carry the comparison along the three dimensions: the communication performance, the security, and the cost analysis. The presented results illustratively demonstrate the differences of the two deployment approaches, and thus can support selection of the most efficient deployment option for a target application. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T20:20:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-203d07d1d5af440eb9430bcae97754fa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1424-8220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T20:20:08Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sensors |
spelling | doaj.art-203d07d1d5af440eb9430bcae97754fa2023-11-23T23:50:12ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-03-01225204210.3390/s22052042Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWANRadek Fujdiak0Konstantin Mikhaylov1Jan Pospisil2Ales Povalac3Jiri Misurec4Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 61600 Brno, Czech RepublicCentre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, Erkki Koiso-Kanttilan Katu 3, 90014 Oulu, FinlandFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 61600 Brno, Czech RepublicFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 61600 Brno, Czech RepublicFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 12, 61600 Brno, Czech RepublicThe last decade has transformed wireless access technologies and crystallized a new direction for the internet of things (IoT). The modern low-power wide-area network (LPWAN) technologies have been introduced to deliver connectivity for billions of devices while keeping the costs and consumption low, and the range of communication high. While the 5G (fifth generation mobile network) LPWAN-like radio technologies, namely NB-IoT (narrowband internet of things) and LTE-M (long-term evolution machine type communication) are emerging, the long-range wide-area network (LoRaWAN) remains extremely popular. One unique feature of this technology, which distinguishes it from the competitors, is the possibility of supporting both public and private network deployments. In this paper we focus on this aspect and deliver original results comparing the performance of the private and public LoRAWAN deployment options; these results should help understand the LoRaWAN technology and give a clear overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the private versus public approaches. Notably, we carry the comparison along the three dimensions: the communication performance, the security, and the cost analysis. The presented results illustratively demonstrate the differences of the two deployment approaches, and thus can support selection of the most efficient deployment option for a target application.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/2042IoTLPWALoRaWANLoRaindoorprivate |
spellingShingle | Radek Fujdiak Konstantin Mikhaylov Jan Pospisil Ales Povalac Jiri Misurec Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN Sensors IoT LPWA LoRaWAN LoRa indoor private |
title | Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN |
title_full | Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN |
title_fullStr | Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN |
title_full_unstemmed | Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN |
title_short | Insights into the Issue of Deploying a Private LoRaWAN |
title_sort | insights into the issue of deploying a private lorawan |
topic | IoT LPWA LoRaWAN LoRa indoor private |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/2042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radekfujdiak insightsintotheissueofdeployingaprivatelorawan AT konstantinmikhaylov insightsintotheissueofdeployingaprivatelorawan AT janpospisil insightsintotheissueofdeployingaprivatelorawan AT alespovalac insightsintotheissueofdeployingaprivatelorawan AT jirimisurec insightsintotheissueofdeployingaprivatelorawan |