Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods

Bionic hands have been employed in a wide range of applications, including prosthetics, robotic grasping, and human–robot interaction. However, considering the underactuated and nonlinear characteristics, as well as the mechanical structure’s backlash, achieving natural and intuitive teleoperation c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junling Fu, Massimiliano Poletti, Qingsheng Liu, Elisa Iovene, Hang Su, Giancarlo Ferrigno, Elena De Momi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Robotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/11/3/61
_version_ 1797482587216674816
author Junling Fu
Massimiliano Poletti
Qingsheng Liu
Elisa Iovene
Hang Su
Giancarlo Ferrigno
Elena De Momi
author_facet Junling Fu
Massimiliano Poletti
Qingsheng Liu
Elisa Iovene
Hang Su
Giancarlo Ferrigno
Elena De Momi
author_sort Junling Fu
collection DOAJ
description Bionic hands have been employed in a wide range of applications, including prosthetics, robotic grasping, and human–robot interaction. However, considering the underactuated and nonlinear characteristics, as well as the mechanical structure’s backlash, achieving natural and intuitive teleoperation control of an underactuated bionic hand remains a critical issue. In this paper, the teleoperation control of an underactuated bionic hand using wearable and vision-tracking system-based methods is investigated. Firstly, the nonlinear behaviour of the bionic hand is observed and the kinematics model is formulated. Then, the wearable-glove-based and the vision-tracking-based teleoperation control frameworks are implemented, respectively. Furthermore, experiments are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and performance of these two methods in terms of accuracy in both static and dynamic scenarios. Finally, a user study and demonstration experiments are conducted to verify the performance of these two approaches in grasp tasks. Both developed systems proved to be exploitable in both powered and precise grasp tasks using the underactuated bionic hand, with a success rate of <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>98.6</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>96.5</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, respectively. The glove-based method turned out to be more accurate and better performing than the vision-based one, but also less comfortable, requiring greater effort by the user. By further incorporating a robot manipulator, the system can be utilised to perform grasp, delivery, or handover tasks in daily, risky, and infectious scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T22:34:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-203eab6d9146499fad6a5c5b8fe28470
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-6581
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T22:34:32Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Robotics
spelling doaj.art-203eab6d9146499fad6a5c5b8fe284702023-11-23T18:50:23ZengMDPI AGRobotics2218-65812022-05-011136110.3390/robotics11030061Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based MethodsJunling Fu0Massimiliano Poletti1Qingsheng Liu2Elisa Iovene3Hang Su4Giancarlo Ferrigno5Elena De Momi6Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyBionic hands have been employed in a wide range of applications, including prosthetics, robotic grasping, and human–robot interaction. However, considering the underactuated and nonlinear characteristics, as well as the mechanical structure’s backlash, achieving natural and intuitive teleoperation control of an underactuated bionic hand remains a critical issue. In this paper, the teleoperation control of an underactuated bionic hand using wearable and vision-tracking system-based methods is investigated. Firstly, the nonlinear behaviour of the bionic hand is observed and the kinematics model is formulated. Then, the wearable-glove-based and the vision-tracking-based teleoperation control frameworks are implemented, respectively. Furthermore, experiments are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and performance of these two methods in terms of accuracy in both static and dynamic scenarios. Finally, a user study and demonstration experiments are conducted to verify the performance of these two approaches in grasp tasks. Both developed systems proved to be exploitable in both powered and precise grasp tasks using the underactuated bionic hand, with a success rate of <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>98.6</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>96.5</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, respectively. The glove-based method turned out to be more accurate and better performing than the vision-based one, but also less comfortable, requiring greater effort by the user. By further incorporating a robot manipulator, the system can be utilised to perform grasp, delivery, or handover tasks in daily, risky, and infectious scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/11/3/61bionic handteleoperation controlhuman–robot interactionwearable glovevision tracking
spellingShingle Junling Fu
Massimiliano Poletti
Qingsheng Liu
Elisa Iovene
Hang Su
Giancarlo Ferrigno
Elena De Momi
Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
Robotics
bionic hand
teleoperation control
human–robot interaction
wearable glove
vision tracking
title Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
title_full Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
title_fullStr Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
title_full_unstemmed Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
title_short Teleoperation Control of an Underactuated Bionic Hand: Comparison between Wearable and Vision-Tracking-Based Methods
title_sort teleoperation control of an underactuated bionic hand comparison between wearable and vision tracking based methods
topic bionic hand
teleoperation control
human–robot interaction
wearable glove
vision tracking
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/11/3/61
work_keys_str_mv AT junlingfu teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT massimilianopoletti teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT qingshengliu teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT elisaiovene teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT hangsu teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT giancarloferrigno teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods
AT elenademomi teleoperationcontrolofanunderactuatedbionichandcomparisonbetweenwearableandvisiontrackingbasedmethods