Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes

Although global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models have increased in sophistication and are now at the forefront of modeling Space Weather, there is still no clear understanding of how well these models replicate the observed ionospheric current systems. Without a full understanding and treatment of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tre’Shunda James, Ramon E. Lopez, Alex Glocer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1212735/full
_version_ 1797741391216902144
author Tre’Shunda James
Ramon E. Lopez
Alex Glocer
author_facet Tre’Shunda James
Ramon E. Lopez
Alex Glocer
author_sort Tre’Shunda James
collection DOAJ
description Although global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models have increased in sophistication and are now at the forefront of modeling Space Weather, there is still no clear understanding of how well these models replicate the observed ionospheric current systems. Without a full understanding and treatment of the ionospheric current systems, global models will have significant shortcomings that will limit their use. In this study we focus on reproducing observed seasonal interhemispheric asymmetry in ionospheric currents using the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF). We find that SWMF does reproduce the linear relationship between the electrojets and the FACs, despite the underestimation of the currents’ magnitudes. Quantitatively, we find that at best SWMF is only capturing approximately 60% of the observed current. We also investigate how varying F10.7 effects the ionospheric potential and currents during the summer and winter. We find that simulations ran with higher F10.7 result in lower ionospheric potentials. Additionally, we find that the models do not always replicate the expected behavior of the currents with varying F10.7. This work points to a needed improvement in ionospheric conductance models.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:26:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2040fdf82e3c44ad9010d1dc2371d75a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-987X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:26:01Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
spelling doaj.art-2040fdf82e3c44ad9010d1dc2371d75a2023-08-18T06:59:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2296-987X2023-08-011010.3389/fspas.2023.12127351212735Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudesTre’Shunda James0Ramon E. Lopez1Alex Glocer2Physics Department, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United StatesPhysics Department, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United StatesNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United StatesAlthough global magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models have increased in sophistication and are now at the forefront of modeling Space Weather, there is still no clear understanding of how well these models replicate the observed ionospheric current systems. Without a full understanding and treatment of the ionospheric current systems, global models will have significant shortcomings that will limit their use. In this study we focus on reproducing observed seasonal interhemispheric asymmetry in ionospheric currents using the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF). We find that SWMF does reproduce the linear relationship between the electrojets and the FACs, despite the underestimation of the currents’ magnitudes. Quantitatively, we find that at best SWMF is only capturing approximately 60% of the observed current. We also investigate how varying F10.7 effects the ionospheric potential and currents during the summer and winter. We find that simulations ran with higher F10.7 result in lower ionospheric potentials. Additionally, we find that the models do not always replicate the expected behavior of the currents with varying F10.7. This work points to a needed improvement in ionospheric conductance models.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1212735/fullFACSMEMHDSWMFF10.7asymmetry
spellingShingle Tre’Shunda James
Ramon E. Lopez
Alex Glocer
Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
FAC
SME
MHD
SWMF
F10.7
asymmetry
title Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
title_full Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
title_fullStr Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
title_short Quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed Birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
title_sort quantifying the ability of magnetohydrodynamic models to reproduce observed birkeland current and auroral electrojet magnitudes
topic FAC
SME
MHD
SWMF
F10.7
asymmetry
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspas.2023.1212735/full
work_keys_str_mv AT treshundajames quantifyingtheabilityofmagnetohydrodynamicmodelstoreproduceobservedbirkelandcurrentandauroralelectrojetmagnitudes
AT ramonelopez quantifyingtheabilityofmagnetohydrodynamicmodelstoreproduceobservedbirkelandcurrentandauroralelectrojetmagnitudes
AT alexglocer quantifyingtheabilityofmagnetohydrodynamicmodelstoreproduceobservedbirkelandcurrentandauroralelectrojetmagnitudes