Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources

This study compared water-heated mats (WM) and electric-heated mats (EM) with heat lamps (HL) as supplemental heat sources for suckling piglets. Forty-two litters were studied in 3 trials. In all trials, behavior of piglets was video-recorded on day 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postpartum. Videos were scan-s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunhui Zhu, Yuzhi Li, Michael Reese, Eric Buchanan, Joel Tallaksen, Lee Johnston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/7/1155
_version_ 1797563060116783104
author Yunhui Zhu
Yuzhi Li
Michael Reese
Eric Buchanan
Joel Tallaksen
Lee Johnston
author_facet Yunhui Zhu
Yuzhi Li
Michael Reese
Eric Buchanan
Joel Tallaksen
Lee Johnston
author_sort Yunhui Zhu
collection DOAJ
description This study compared water-heated mats (WM) and electric-heated mats (EM) with heat lamps (HL) as supplemental heat sources for suckling piglets. Forty-two litters were studied in 3 trials. In all trials, behavior of piglets was video-recorded on day 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postpartum. Videos were scan-sampled to register postures (lying and standing) and locations (on or away from mat) to assess piglet use of heat sources. Litter size and weight at birth and weaning, and pre-weaning mortality were recorded. Data were analyzed using Glimmix Procedures of SAS. Piglets spent more time on WM than under HL (67.5% vs. 51.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). No difference in piglet performance between WM and HL was observed, except mortality tended to be higher in WM (22.9% vs. 8.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.06). Piglet performance and use of the heat source were comparable for HL and EM. When comparing WM with EM, piglets provided WM spent more time on the mat compared to those provided EM (21.8% vs. 17.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). No difference in pre-weaning mortality, litter weight, and individual daily gain was observed between WM and EM group. These results suggest EM and HL were comparable to maintain performance and postural behaviors of piglets.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:37:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-204ebf676e324628a5a095fd32951ca1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:37:13Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-204ebf676e324628a5a095fd32951ca12023-11-20T06:05:31ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-07-01107115510.3390/ani10071155Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat SourcesYunhui Zhu0Yuzhi Li1Michael Reese2Eric Buchanan3Joel Tallaksen4Lee Johnston5West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USAThis study compared water-heated mats (WM) and electric-heated mats (EM) with heat lamps (HL) as supplemental heat sources for suckling piglets. Forty-two litters were studied in 3 trials. In all trials, behavior of piglets was video-recorded on day 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 postpartum. Videos were scan-sampled to register postures (lying and standing) and locations (on or away from mat) to assess piglet use of heat sources. Litter size and weight at birth and weaning, and pre-weaning mortality were recorded. Data were analyzed using Glimmix Procedures of SAS. Piglets spent more time on WM than under HL (67.5% vs. 51.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). No difference in piglet performance between WM and HL was observed, except mortality tended to be higher in WM (22.9% vs. 8.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.06). Piglet performance and use of the heat source were comparable for HL and EM. When comparing WM with EM, piglets provided WM spent more time on the mat compared to those provided EM (21.8% vs. 17.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.02). No difference in pre-weaning mortality, litter weight, and individual daily gain was observed between WM and EM group. These results suggest EM and HL were comparable to maintain performance and postural behaviors of piglets.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/7/1155behaviorperformancepigletsheat source
spellingShingle Yunhui Zhu
Yuzhi Li
Michael Reese
Eric Buchanan
Joel Tallaksen
Lee Johnston
Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
Animals
behavior
performance
piglets
heat source
title Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
title_full Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
title_fullStr Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
title_full_unstemmed Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
title_short Behavior and Performance of Suckling Piglets Provided Three Supplemental Heat Sources
title_sort behavior and performance of suckling piglets provided three supplemental heat sources
topic behavior
performance
piglets
heat source
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/7/1155
work_keys_str_mv AT yunhuizhu behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources
AT yuzhili behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources
AT michaelreese behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources
AT ericbuchanan behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources
AT joeltallaksen behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources
AT leejohnston behaviorandperformanceofsucklingpigletsprovidedthreesupplementalheatsources