Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Survival is estimated at less than 2 years without aortic valve replacement (AVR). Limited data are available on the effects and outcomes of AVR in such patients, esp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naicker, A., Brown, S., Ponnusamy, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: South African Heart Association 2017-02-01
Series:SA Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/article/view/1582
_version_ 1818311159274536960
author Naicker, A.
Brown, S.
Ponnusamy, S.
author_facet Naicker, A.
Brown, S.
Ponnusamy, S.
author_sort Naicker, A.
collection DOAJ
description Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Survival is estimated at less than 2 years without aortic valve replacement (AVR). Limited data are available on the effects and outcomes of AVR in such patients, especially in the absence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: This was a retrospective study which identifi ed 33 patients over an approximate 10 year period who underwent surgical AVR for severe isolated AS and LVD (LVEF ≤50%). Patients were excluded if they had a prior valve replacement, mixed valve disease, <18 years old or the presence of CAD. Overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model. The changes in postoperative LVEF and NYHA functional class, following AVR, was assessed using the Friedman test and ANOVA. Results: Operative mortality was 15% with 5 deaths. Female sex and hyperlipidaemia were identifi ed as predictors of early mortality by univariate analysis. LVEF improved in survivors from a mean of 39 ± 10% - 49.8 ± 8.7% at a 1 year follow-up (p=0.04). Younger age was identifi ed as an independent predictor of LVEF recovery (p=0.04). There was no difference in outcomes in patients with low baseline transvalvular gradients compared to those with higher gradients. There was signifi cant symptomatic improvement noted in all survivors following AVR (p<0.01). Conclusion: Left ventricular function has a slower rate of recovery, compared to an earlier improvement of NYHA functional class after AVR for severe isolated AS and pre-operative LVD. In this high-risk group the fi ndings support AVR in patients with LVD.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:57:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2058d076a1a54ef4bcfb0586720c53f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-6741
2071-4602
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:57:31Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher South African Heart Association
record_format Article
series SA Heart Journal
spelling doaj.art-2058d076a1a54ef4bcfb0586720c53f72022-12-21T23:54:30ZengSouth African Heart AssociationSA Heart Journal1996-67412071-46022017-02-0113429029610.24170/13-4-1582Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunctionNaicker, A. 0Brown, S. 1Ponnusamy, S. 2University of KwaZulu-NatalUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalBackground: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Survival is estimated at less than 2 years without aortic valve replacement (AVR). Limited data are available on the effects and outcomes of AVR in such patients, especially in the absence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: This was a retrospective study which identifi ed 33 patients over an approximate 10 year period who underwent surgical AVR for severe isolated AS and LVD (LVEF ≤50%). Patients were excluded if they had a prior valve replacement, mixed valve disease, <18 years old or the presence of CAD. Overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model. The changes in postoperative LVEF and NYHA functional class, following AVR, was assessed using the Friedman test and ANOVA. Results: Operative mortality was 15% with 5 deaths. Female sex and hyperlipidaemia were identifi ed as predictors of early mortality by univariate analysis. LVEF improved in survivors from a mean of 39 ± 10% - 49.8 ± 8.7% at a 1 year follow-up (p=0.04). Younger age was identifi ed as an independent predictor of LVEF recovery (p=0.04). There was no difference in outcomes in patients with low baseline transvalvular gradients compared to those with higher gradients. There was signifi cant symptomatic improvement noted in all survivors following AVR (p<0.01). Conclusion: Left ventricular function has a slower rate of recovery, compared to an earlier improvement of NYHA functional class after AVR for severe isolated AS and pre-operative LVD. In this high-risk group the fi ndings support AVR in patients with LVD.https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/article/view/1582Oortic valve replacementSevere aortic stenosisLeft ventricular dysfunction
spellingShingle Naicker, A.
Brown, S.
Ponnusamy, S.
Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
SA Heart Journal
Oortic valve replacement
Severe aortic stenosis
Left ventricular dysfunction
title Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
title_full Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
title_fullStr Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
title_short Outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
title_sort outcomes following aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction
topic Oortic valve replacement
Severe aortic stenosis
Left ventricular dysfunction
url https://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ/article/view/1582
work_keys_str_mv AT naickera outcomesfollowingaorticvalvereplacementforisolatedaorticstenosiswithleftventriculardysfunction
AT browns outcomesfollowingaorticvalvereplacementforisolatedaorticstenosiswithleftventriculardysfunction
AT ponnusamys outcomesfollowingaorticvalvereplacementforisolatedaorticstenosiswithleftventriculardysfunction