Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes

ABSTRACT Introduction: Custodiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) and repetitive blood cardioplegia are the solutions for myocardial protection and cardiac arrest. In this study, we aimed to compare immunohistochemical analysis, clinical outcomes, and cardiac enzyme values of Custodiol and bloo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Onur Sen, Unal Aydin, Ersin Kadirogullari, Salih Güler, Süheyla Gonca, Seyhun Solakoğlu, Mehmet Karaçalılar, Barış Timur, Burak Onan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2022-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500680&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811220506173505536
author Onur Sen
Unal Aydin
Ersin Kadirogullari
Salih Güler
Süheyla Gonca
Seyhun Solakoğlu
Mehmet Karaçalılar
Barış Timur
Burak Onan
author_facet Onur Sen
Unal Aydin
Ersin Kadirogullari
Salih Güler
Süheyla Gonca
Seyhun Solakoğlu
Mehmet Karaçalılar
Barış Timur
Burak Onan
author_sort Onur Sen
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Custodiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) and repetitive blood cardioplegia are the solutions for myocardial protection and cardiac arrest. In this study, we aimed to compare immunohistochemical analysis, clinical outcomes, and cardiac enzyme values of Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups. Methods: This was a randomized prospective study consisting of 2 groups and 20 patients, 10 patients for each group, who underwent mitral and mitral/tricuspid valve surgery. Group 1 was formed for Custodiol cardioplegia and group 2 for blood cardioplegia. Perioperative and postoperative cardiac events were recorded, cardiac enzymes were analyzed with intervals, and myocardial samples were taken for immunohistochemical analysis. Recorded data were statistically evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference for the Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups in perioperative and postoperative cardiac performance and adverse events. Cardiac enzyme analysis showed no significant difference between groups. However, two parameters (eNOS, Bcl-2) were in favor of the Custodiol group in immunohistochemical studies. Custodiol performed better in cellular oxidative stress resistance and cellular viability. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes and cardiac enzyme analysis results were similar regarding myocardial protection. However, Custodiol performed better in the immunohistochemical analysis.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:44:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20651dd88dc54229b1bd86bd1d3e9054
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-9741
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:44:15Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
spelling doaj.art-20651dd88dc54229b1bd86bd1d3e90542022-12-22T03:41:45ZengSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia CardiovascularBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery1678-97412022-11-0137568068710.21470/1678-9741-2020-0662Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical OutcomesOnur Senhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-108XUnal AydinErsin KadirogullariSalih GülerSüheyla GoncaSeyhun SolakoğluMehmet KaraçalılarBarış TimurBurak OnanABSTRACT Introduction: Custodiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate) and repetitive blood cardioplegia are the solutions for myocardial protection and cardiac arrest. In this study, we aimed to compare immunohistochemical analysis, clinical outcomes, and cardiac enzyme values of Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups. Methods: This was a randomized prospective study consisting of 2 groups and 20 patients, 10 patients for each group, who underwent mitral and mitral/tricuspid valve surgery. Group 1 was formed for Custodiol cardioplegia and group 2 for blood cardioplegia. Perioperative and postoperative cardiac events were recorded, cardiac enzymes were analyzed with intervals, and myocardial samples were taken for immunohistochemical analysis. Recorded data were statistically evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference for the Custodiol and blood cardioplegia groups in perioperative and postoperative cardiac performance and adverse events. Cardiac enzyme analysis showed no significant difference between groups. However, two parameters (eNOS, Bcl-2) were in favor of the Custodiol group in immunohistochemical studies. Custodiol performed better in cellular oxidative stress resistance and cellular viability. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes and cardiac enzyme analysis results were similar regarding myocardial protection. However, Custodiol performed better in the immunohistochemical analysis.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500680&lng=en&tlng=enCustodiol-N solutionsCardioplegic SolutionsOxidative StressCardiac Surgical ProceduresHeart ArrestInducedImmunohistochemistry
spellingShingle Onur Sen
Unal Aydin
Ersin Kadirogullari
Salih Güler
Süheyla Gonca
Seyhun Solakoğlu
Mehmet Karaçalılar
Barış Timur
Burak Onan
Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Custodiol-N solutions
Cardioplegic Solutions
Oxidative Stress
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Heart Arrest
Induced
Immunohistochemistry
title Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
title_full Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
title_short Custodiol versus Blood Cardioplegia: Comparison of Myocardial Immunohistochemical Analysis and Clinical Outcomes
title_sort custodiol versus blood cardioplegia comparison of myocardial immunohistochemical analysis and clinical outcomes
topic Custodiol-N solutions
Cardioplegic Solutions
Oxidative Stress
Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Heart Arrest
Induced
Immunohistochemistry
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382022000500680&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT onursen custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT unalaydin custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT ersinkadirogullari custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT salihguler custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT suheylagonca custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT seyhunsolakoglu custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT mehmetkaracalılar custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT barıstimur custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes
AT burakonan custodiolversusbloodcardioplegiacomparisonofmyocardialimmunohistochemicalanalysisandclinicaloutcomes