The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.

Adapting reaches to altered visual feedback not only leads to motor changes, but also to shifts in perceived hand location; "proprioceptive recalibration". These changes are robust to many task variations and can occur quite rapidly. For instance, our previous study found both motor and se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer E Ruttle, Bernard Marius 't Hart, Denise Y P Henriques
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6049908?pdf=render
_version_ 1819014855525400576
author Jennifer E Ruttle
Bernard Marius 't Hart
Denise Y P Henriques
author_facet Jennifer E Ruttle
Bernard Marius 't Hart
Denise Y P Henriques
author_sort Jennifer E Ruttle
collection DOAJ
description Adapting reaches to altered visual feedback not only leads to motor changes, but also to shifts in perceived hand location; "proprioceptive recalibration". These changes are robust to many task variations and can occur quite rapidly. For instance, our previous study found both motor and sensory shifts arise in as few as 6 rotated-cursor training trials. The aim of this study is to investigate one of the training signals that contribute to these rapid sensory and motor changes. We do this by removing the visuomotor error signals associated with classic visuomotor rotation training; and provide only experience with a visual-proprioceptive discrepancy for training. While a force channel constrains reach direction 30o away from the target, the cursor representing the hand unerringly moves straight to the target. The resulting visual-proprioceptive discrepancy drives significant and rapid changes in no-cursor reaches and felt hand position, again within only 6 training trials. The extent of the sensory change is unexpectedly larger following the visual-proprioceptive discrepancy training. Not surprisingly the size of the reach aftereffects is substantially smaller than following classic visuomotor rotation training. However, the time course by which both changes emerge is similar in the two training types. These results suggest that even the mere exposure to a discrepancy between felt and seen hand location is a sufficient training signal to drive robust motor and sensory plasticity.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T02:22:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-207f29307ed74ca9bd1594b45bd57728
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T02:22:28Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-207f29307ed74ca9bd1594b45bd577282022-12-21T19:19:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e020062110.1371/journal.pone.0200621The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.Jennifer E RuttleBernard Marius 't HartDenise Y P HenriquesAdapting reaches to altered visual feedback not only leads to motor changes, but also to shifts in perceived hand location; "proprioceptive recalibration". These changes are robust to many task variations and can occur quite rapidly. For instance, our previous study found both motor and sensory shifts arise in as few as 6 rotated-cursor training trials. The aim of this study is to investigate one of the training signals that contribute to these rapid sensory and motor changes. We do this by removing the visuomotor error signals associated with classic visuomotor rotation training; and provide only experience with a visual-proprioceptive discrepancy for training. While a force channel constrains reach direction 30o away from the target, the cursor representing the hand unerringly moves straight to the target. The resulting visual-proprioceptive discrepancy drives significant and rapid changes in no-cursor reaches and felt hand position, again within only 6 training trials. The extent of the sensory change is unexpectedly larger following the visual-proprioceptive discrepancy training. Not surprisingly the size of the reach aftereffects is substantially smaller than following classic visuomotor rotation training. However, the time course by which both changes emerge is similar in the two training types. These results suggest that even the mere exposure to a discrepancy between felt and seen hand location is a sufficient training signal to drive robust motor and sensory plasticity.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6049908?pdf=render
spellingShingle Jennifer E Ruttle
Bernard Marius 't Hart
Denise Y P Henriques
The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
PLoS ONE
title The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
title_full The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
title_fullStr The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
title_full_unstemmed The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
title_short The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration.
title_sort fast contribution of visual proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6049908?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifereruttle thefastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration
AT bernardmariusthart thefastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration
AT deniseyphenriques thefastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration
AT jennifereruttle fastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration
AT bernardmariusthart fastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration
AT deniseyphenriques fastcontributionofvisualproprioceptivediscrepancytoreachaftereffectsandproprioceptiverecalibration