Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation

Estimating crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) is an important requirement for a rational assessment and management of water resources. The various remote sensing products allow the determination of crops’ biophysical variables integrated in the evaluation of ET<sub>a</sub&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hedia Chakroun, Nessrine Zemni, Ali Benhmid, Vetiya Dellaly, Fairouz Slama, Fethi Bouksila, Ronny Berndtsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/5/2823
_version_ 1827752042565730304
author Hedia Chakroun
Nessrine Zemni
Ali Benhmid
Vetiya Dellaly
Fairouz Slama
Fethi Bouksila
Ronny Berndtsson
author_facet Hedia Chakroun
Nessrine Zemni
Ali Benhmid
Vetiya Dellaly
Fairouz Slama
Fethi Bouksila
Ronny Berndtsson
author_sort Hedia Chakroun
collection DOAJ
description Estimating crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) is an important requirement for a rational assessment and management of water resources. The various remote sensing products allow the determination of crops’ biophysical variables integrated in the evaluation of ET<sub>a</sub> by using surface energy balance (SEB) models. This study compares ET<sub>a</sub> estimated by the simplified surface energy balance index (S-SEBI) using Landsat 8 optical and thermal infra-red spectral bands and transit model HYDRUS-1D. In semi-arid Tunisia, real time measurements of soil water content (θ) and pore electrical conductivity (EC<sub>p</sub>) were made in the crop root zone using capacitive sensors (5TE) for rainfed and drip irrigated crops (barley and potato). Results show that HYDRUS model is a fast and cost-effective assessment tool for water flow and salt movement in the crop root layer. ET<sub>a</sub> estimated by S-SEBI varies according to the available energy resulting from the difference between the net radiation and soil flux G<sub>0</sub>, and more specifically according to the assessed G<sub>0</sub> from remote sensing. Compared to HYDRUS, the ET<sub>a</sub> from S-SEBI was estimated to have an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.86 and 0.70 for barley and potato, respectively. The S-SEBI performed better for rainfed barley (RMSE between 0.35 and 0.46 mm·d<sup>−1</sup>) than for drip irrigated potato (RMSE between 1.5 and 1.9 mm·d<sup>−1</sup>).
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:09:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-207fd16d50a14735aa74e90a8132602b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:09:13Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-207fd16d50a14735aa74e90a8132602b2023-11-17T08:40:14ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-03-01235282310.3390/s23052823Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water SimulationHedia Chakroun0Nessrine Zemni1Ali Benhmid2Vetiya Dellaly3Fairouz Slama4Fethi Bouksila5Ronny Berndtsson6LR99ES19 Laboratory of Modelling in Hydraulics and Environment (LMHE), National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), University of Tunis El Manar, BP 37, Tunis 1002, TunisiaLR20INRGREF04 Laboratory of Rural Engineering, National Institute for Research in Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry (INRGREF), University of Carthage, BP 10, Ariana 2080, TunisiaLR99ES19 Laboratory of Modelling in Hydraulics and Environment (LMHE), National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), University of Tunis El Manar, BP 37, Tunis 1002, TunisiaLR99ES19 Laboratory of Modelling in Hydraulics and Environment (LMHE), National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), University of Tunis El Manar, BP 37, Tunis 1002, TunisiaLR99ES19 Laboratory of Modelling in Hydraulics and Environment (LMHE), National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), University of Tunis El Manar, BP 37, Tunis 1002, TunisiaLR20INRGREF04 Laboratory of Rural Engineering, National Institute for Research in Rural Engineering, Water and Forestry (INRGREF), University of Carthage, BP 10, Ariana 2080, TunisiaDivision of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, SwedenEstimating crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) is an important requirement for a rational assessment and management of water resources. The various remote sensing products allow the determination of crops’ biophysical variables integrated in the evaluation of ET<sub>a</sub> by using surface energy balance (SEB) models. This study compares ET<sub>a</sub> estimated by the simplified surface energy balance index (S-SEBI) using Landsat 8 optical and thermal infra-red spectral bands and transit model HYDRUS-1D. In semi-arid Tunisia, real time measurements of soil water content (θ) and pore electrical conductivity (EC<sub>p</sub>) were made in the crop root zone using capacitive sensors (5TE) for rainfed and drip irrigated crops (barley and potato). Results show that HYDRUS model is a fast and cost-effective assessment tool for water flow and salt movement in the crop root layer. ET<sub>a</sub> estimated by S-SEBI varies according to the available energy resulting from the difference between the net radiation and soil flux G<sub>0</sub>, and more specifically according to the assessed G<sub>0</sub> from remote sensing. Compared to HYDRUS, the ET<sub>a</sub> from S-SEBI was estimated to have an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.86 and 0.70 for barley and potato, respectively. The S-SEBI performed better for rainfed barley (RMSE between 0.35 and 0.46 mm·d<sup>−1</sup>) than for drip irrigated potato (RMSE between 1.5 and 1.9 mm·d<sup>−1</sup>).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/5/2823S-SEBIHYDRUS-1D5TE sensorevaporative fractionevapotranspirationbarley
spellingShingle Hedia Chakroun
Nessrine Zemni
Ali Benhmid
Vetiya Dellaly
Fairouz Slama
Fethi Bouksila
Ronny Berndtsson
Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
Sensors
S-SEBI
HYDRUS-1D
5TE sensor
evaporative fraction
evapotranspiration
barley
title Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
title_full Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
title_fullStr Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
title_short Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid Climate: Remote Sensing vs. Soil Water Simulation
title_sort evapotranspiration in semi arid climate remote sensing vs soil water simulation
topic S-SEBI
HYDRUS-1D
5TE sensor
evaporative fraction
evapotranspiration
barley
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/5/2823
work_keys_str_mv AT hediachakroun evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT nessrinezemni evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT alibenhmid evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT vetiyadellaly evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT fairouzslama evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT fethibouksila evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation
AT ronnyberndtsson evapotranspirationinsemiaridclimateremotesensingvssoilwatersimulation