Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading

Numerous researchers of soil creep behavior adopt stepwise loading (SL) rather than respective loading (RL) to perform the triaxial creep tests. However, a complete continuous strain–time curve of SL needs to be converted into assumed curve clusters supposing obtained under RL before the deformation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haigang Qu, Dianrui Mu, Zhong Nie, Aiping Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Geotechnics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7094/2/4/41
_version_ 1797457664435814400
author Haigang Qu
Dianrui Mu
Zhong Nie
Aiping Tang
author_facet Haigang Qu
Dianrui Mu
Zhong Nie
Aiping Tang
author_sort Haigang Qu
collection DOAJ
description Numerous researchers of soil creep behavior adopt stepwise loading (SL) rather than respective loading (RL) to perform the triaxial creep tests. However, a complete continuous strain–time curve of SL needs to be converted into assumed curve clusters supposing obtained under RL before the deformation data are used to develop creep constitutive models. Classical methods realize the conversion mainly by focusing on the creep deformation parts and classifying them into linear and nonlinear compositions. Mostly, the linear parts are simply superposed while the nonlinear parts are complex to consider and so are neglected. Moreover, classical methods are not sufficiently valid to eliminate the stress history effect on the conversion. Here, a new method is proposed to achieve the conversion without neglecting the stress history effect. The method rebuilds the triaxial creep test mathematically and physically, adhering to the revising of energy. The method treats the tested deformation in its entirety, instead of distinguishing it into elastic, visco-elastic, plastic and creep (linear and nonlinear) deformation to convert respectively. The comparison among actual measured SL and RL strain–time curves and the curves converted by the new method proves the stress history effect should not be neglected. The higher the vertical load level, the larger the discrepancy between the RL and SL strain–time curve, and the disparity becomes larger with time. The new method highlights the necessity of considering the stress history effect in analysis and design for higher accuracy. The comparisons illustrate the conversion method at least produces more satisfactory results for clayey soil. Primarily examined, at the later stages of loading, the disparity in strain between the converted RL and measured RL decreases by 52.5%~53.5% compared with strain between the measured SL and measured RL.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:26:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-208f0aa136e94005a7bf7346fd78adda
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-7094
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:26:16Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Geotechnics
spelling doaj.art-208f0aa136e94005a7bf7346fd78adda2023-11-24T15:07:31ZengMDPI AGGeotechnics2673-70942022-09-012485587010.3390/geotechnics2040041Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective LoadingHaigang Qu0Dianrui Mu1Zhong Nie2Aiping Tang3School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, ChinaEngineering Research Institute of Appraisal and Strengthening of Shandong Jianzhu University Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, ChinaNumerous researchers of soil creep behavior adopt stepwise loading (SL) rather than respective loading (RL) to perform the triaxial creep tests. However, a complete continuous strain–time curve of SL needs to be converted into assumed curve clusters supposing obtained under RL before the deformation data are used to develop creep constitutive models. Classical methods realize the conversion mainly by focusing on the creep deformation parts and classifying them into linear and nonlinear compositions. Mostly, the linear parts are simply superposed while the nonlinear parts are complex to consider and so are neglected. Moreover, classical methods are not sufficiently valid to eliminate the stress history effect on the conversion. Here, a new method is proposed to achieve the conversion without neglecting the stress history effect. The method rebuilds the triaxial creep test mathematically and physically, adhering to the revising of energy. The method treats the tested deformation in its entirety, instead of distinguishing it into elastic, visco-elastic, plastic and creep (linear and nonlinear) deformation to convert respectively. The comparison among actual measured SL and RL strain–time curves and the curves converted by the new method proves the stress history effect should not be neglected. The higher the vertical load level, the larger the discrepancy between the RL and SL strain–time curve, and the disparity becomes larger with time. The new method highlights the necessity of considering the stress history effect in analysis and design for higher accuracy. The comparisons illustrate the conversion method at least produces more satisfactory results for clayey soil. Primarily examined, at the later stages of loading, the disparity in strain between the converted RL and measured RL decreases by 52.5%~53.5% compared with strain between the measured SL and measured RL.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7094/2/4/41soft soilcreepstrain–time curvestepwise loadingrespective loading
spellingShingle Haigang Qu
Dianrui Mu
Zhong Nie
Aiping Tang
Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
Geotechnics
soft soil
creep
strain–time curve
stepwise loading
respective loading
title Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
title_full Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
title_fullStr Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
title_full_unstemmed Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
title_short Conversion of Triaxial Compression Strain–Time Curves from Stepwise Loading to Respective Loading
title_sort conversion of triaxial compression strain time curves from stepwise loading to respective loading
topic soft soil
creep
strain–time curve
stepwise loading
respective loading
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7094/2/4/41
work_keys_str_mv AT haigangqu conversionoftriaxialcompressionstraintimecurvesfromstepwiseloadingtorespectiveloading
AT dianruimu conversionoftriaxialcompressionstraintimecurvesfromstepwiseloadingtorespectiveloading
AT zhongnie conversionoftriaxialcompressionstraintimecurvesfromstepwiseloadingtorespectiveloading
AT aipingtang conversionoftriaxialcompressionstraintimecurvesfromstepwiseloadingtorespectiveloading