The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study

Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura E. Forrest, Rowan Forbes Shepherd, Erin Tutty, Angela Pearce, Ian Campbell, Lisa Devereux, Alison H. Trainer, Paul A. James, Mary-Anne Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/7/1112
_version_ 1797433373779558400
author Laura E. Forrest
Rowan Forbes Shepherd
Erin Tutty
Angela Pearce
Ian Campbell
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Paul A. James
Mary-Anne Young
author_facet Laura E. Forrest
Rowan Forbes Shepherd
Erin Tutty
Angela Pearce
Ian Campbell
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Paul A. James
Mary-Anne Young
author_sort Laura E. Forrest
collection DOAJ
description Background Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outside of clinical genetics services are unknown. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods case-control study compared outcomes between women who did (cases; group 1) and did not (controls; group 2) receive clinically actionable genetic information from a research cohort in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed an online survey examining cancer risk perception and worry, and group 1 also completed distress and adaptation measures. Group 1 participants subsequently completed a semi structured interview. Results: Forty-five participants (group 1) and 96 (group 2) completed the online survey, and 31 group 1 participants were interviewed. There were no demographic differences between groups 1 and 2, although more of group 1 participants had children (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Group 1 reported significantly higher breast cancer risk perception (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to group 2, and higher cancer worry than group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Some group 1 participants described how receiving their genetic information heightened their cancer risk perception and exacerbated their cancer worry while waiting for risk-reducing surgery. Group 1 participants reported a MICRA mean score of 27.4 (SD 11.8, range 9–56; possible range 0–95), and an adaptation score of 2.9 (SD = 1.1). Conclusion: There were no adverse psychological outcomes amongst women who received clinically actionable germline information through a model of ‘genome-first’ care compared to those who did not. These findings support the return of clinically actionable research results to research participants.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:16:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20942c026cb441f39faa069c8d6837fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:16:07Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-20942c026cb441f39faa069c8d6837fc2023-12-01T22:20:42ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262022-07-01127111210.3390/jpm12071112The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative StudyLaura E. Forrest0Rowan Forbes Shepherd1Erin Tutty2Angela Pearce3Ian Campbell4Lisa Devereux5Alison H. Trainer6Paul A. James7Mary-Anne Young8Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaKinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaBackground Research identifying and returning clinically actionable germline variants offer a new avenue of access to genetic information. The psychosocial and clinical outcomes for women who have received this ‘genome-first care’ delivering hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk information outside of clinical genetics services are unknown. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods case-control study compared outcomes between women who did (cases; group 1) and did not (controls; group 2) receive clinically actionable genetic information from a research cohort in Victoria, Australia. Participants completed an online survey examining cancer risk perception and worry, and group 1 also completed distress and adaptation measures. Group 1 participants subsequently completed a semi structured interview. Results: Forty-five participants (group 1) and 96 (group 2) completed the online survey, and 31 group 1 participants were interviewed. There were no demographic differences between groups 1 and 2, although more of group 1 participants had children (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Group 1 reported significantly higher breast cancer risk perception (<i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to group 2, and higher cancer worry than group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Some group 1 participants described how receiving their genetic information heightened their cancer risk perception and exacerbated their cancer worry while waiting for risk-reducing surgery. Group 1 participants reported a MICRA mean score of 27.4 (SD 11.8, range 9–56; possible range 0–95), and an adaptation score of 2.9 (SD = 1.1). Conclusion: There were no adverse psychological outcomes amongst women who received clinically actionable germline information through a model of ‘genome-first’ care compared to those who did not. These findings support the return of clinically actionable research results to research participants.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/7/1112returning research resultsclinically actionable genetic informationmixed-methodspsychosocial outcomesclinical outcomes
spellingShingle Laura E. Forrest
Rowan Forbes Shepherd
Erin Tutty
Angela Pearce
Ian Campbell
Lisa Devereux
Alison H. Trainer
Paul A. James
Mary-Anne Young
The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
Journal of Personalized Medicine
returning research results
clinically actionable genetic information
mixed-methods
psychosocial outcomes
clinical outcomes
title The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_full The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_fullStr The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_short The Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes for Women Who Received Unexpected Clinically Actionable Germline Information Identified through Research: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Comparative Study
title_sort clinical and psychosocial outcomes for women who received unexpected clinically actionable germline information identified through research an exploratory sequential mixed methods comparative study
topic returning research results
clinically actionable genetic information
mixed-methods
psychosocial outcomes
clinical outcomes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/7/1112
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraeforrest theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT rowanforbesshepherd theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT erintutty theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT angelapearce theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT iancampbell theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT lisadevereux theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT alisonhtrainer theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT paulajames theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT maryanneyoung theclinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT lauraeforrest clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT rowanforbesshepherd clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT erintutty clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT angelapearce clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT iancampbell clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT lisadevereux clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT alisonhtrainer clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT paulajames clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy
AT maryanneyoung clinicalandpsychosocialoutcomesforwomenwhoreceivedunexpectedclinicallyactionablegermlineinformationidentifiedthroughresearchanexploratorysequentialmixedmethodscomparativestudy