Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities

Background: Canada has a publicly-funded universal health care system with unique information systems managed by 13 different provinces and territories. This context creates inconsistencies in data collection and challenges for research or surveillance conducted at the national or multi-jurisdiction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda Leanne Butler, Mark Smith, Wayne Jones, Carol E Adair, Simone Vigod, Paul Kurdyak, Alain Lesage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2018-09-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/443
_version_ 1797426312461156352
author Amanda Leanne Butler
Mark Smith
Wayne Jones
Carol E Adair
Simone Vigod
Paul Kurdyak
Alain Lesage
author_facet Amanda Leanne Butler
Mark Smith
Wayne Jones
Carol E Adair
Simone Vigod
Paul Kurdyak
Alain Lesage
author_sort Amanda Leanne Butler
collection DOAJ
description Background: Canada has a publicly-funded universal health care system with unique information systems managed by 13 different provinces and territories. This context creates inconsistencies in data collection and challenges for research or surveillance conducted at the national or multi-jurisdictional level. Objective: Using a recent five-province research project as a case study, we document the strengths and challenges of using Canadian administrative health data in a multi-jurisdictional context. We discuss the implications of using different health information systems and the solutions we adopted to deal with variations. Our goal is to contribute to better understanding of these challenges and the development of a more integrated and harmonized approach to conducting multi-jurisdictional research in Canada. Context and Model: In 2015, the Graham Boeckh Foundation, in collaboration with the Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health, initiated a project to create and report on a small number of mental health and addiction services performance indicators that could be compared across Canadian provinces. A team of scientists from five provinces developed the measures and implemented them using data from five separate provincial health care data systems. We document the research process, challenges, solutions and successes. Finally, we conclude by making recommendations for investment in national infrastructure that could help cut costs, broaden scope, and increase use of the rich resource of administrative health data that exists in Canada. Conclusion: Canada has an incredible wealth of administrative data that resides in 13 territorial and provincial government systems. Navigating access and improving comparability across these systems has been an ongoing challenge for the past 20 years, but progress is being made. We believe that with some investment, a more harmonized and integrated information network could be developed that supports a broad range of surveillance and research activities with strong policy and program implications.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:28:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-209bbe0cefd34763822c0c1bb44e2af4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:28:29Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-209bbe0cefd34763822c0c1bb44e2af42023-12-02T20:39:29ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082018-09-013310.23889/ijpds.v3i3.443Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunitiesAmanda Leanne Butler0Mark Smith1Wayne Jones2Carol E AdairSimone VigodPaul KurdyakAlain LesageSimon Fraser UniversityManitoba Center for Health PolicyCentre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction (CARMHA), Simon Fraser UniversityBackground: Canada has a publicly-funded universal health care system with unique information systems managed by 13 different provinces and territories. This context creates inconsistencies in data collection and challenges for research or surveillance conducted at the national or multi-jurisdictional level. Objective: Using a recent five-province research project as a case study, we document the strengths and challenges of using Canadian administrative health data in a multi-jurisdictional context. We discuss the implications of using different health information systems and the solutions we adopted to deal with variations. Our goal is to contribute to better understanding of these challenges and the development of a more integrated and harmonized approach to conducting multi-jurisdictional research in Canada. Context and Model: In 2015, the Graham Boeckh Foundation, in collaboration with the Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health, initiated a project to create and report on a small number of mental health and addiction services performance indicators that could be compared across Canadian provinces. A team of scientists from five provinces developed the measures and implemented them using data from five separate provincial health care data systems. We document the research process, challenges, solutions and successes. Finally, we conclude by making recommendations for investment in national infrastructure that could help cut costs, broaden scope, and increase use of the rich resource of administrative health data that exists in Canada. Conclusion: Canada has an incredible wealth of administrative data that resides in 13 territorial and provincial government systems. Navigating access and improving comparability across these systems has been an ongoing challenge for the past 20 years, but progress is being made. We believe that with some investment, a more harmonized and integrated information network could be developed that supports a broad range of surveillance and research activities with strong policy and program implications.https://ijpds.org/article/view/443health administrative dataepidemiologydata linkagecommon analytic protocol
spellingShingle Amanda Leanne Butler
Mark Smith
Wayne Jones
Carol E Adair
Simone Vigod
Paul Kurdyak
Alain Lesage
Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
International Journal of Population Data Science
health administrative data
epidemiology
data linkage
common analytic protocol
title Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
title_full Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
title_fullStr Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
title_short Multi-province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in Canada: challenges and opportunities
title_sort multi province epidemiological research studies using administrative data in canada challenges and opportunities
topic health administrative data
epidemiology
data linkage
common analytic protocol
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/443
work_keys_str_mv AT amandaleannebutler multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT marksmith multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT waynejones multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT caroleadair multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT simonevigod multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT paulkurdyak multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities
AT alainlesage multiprovinceepidemiologicalresearchstudiesusingadministrativedataincanadachallengesandopportunities