Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study
Background: The success of endodontic treatment depends on the chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, the debris produced during canal preparation may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the apical debris extrus...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=3;spage=512;epage=516;aulast=Asif |
| _version_ | 1819025897025437696 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahsana Asif Ganesh Jeevanandan Lavanya Govindaraju R Vignesh E M G. Subramanian |
| author_facet | Ahsana Asif Ganesh Jeevanandan Lavanya Govindaraju R Vignesh E M G. Subramanian |
| author_sort | Ahsana Asif |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The success of endodontic treatment depends on the chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, the debris produced during canal preparation may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation in primary anterior teeth using hand files, rotary ProTaper files, and rotary Kedo-S files. Materials and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted primary canine with mature apices and a single canal were randomly divided into three groups for instrumentation as follows (n = 15): Group 1: hand files; Group 2: rotary ProTaper files; and Group 3: rotary Kedo-S files. Myers and Montgomery experimental model was used for this study. Apically extruded debris collected in a preweighed Eppendorf tubes was placed in the incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The weight of the debris collected was determined by subtracting the pre- and post-instrumentation weight of the Eppendorf tubes. The data collected were analyzed using the analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc tests. Results: Hand files produced more apical debris extrusion than ProTaper and Kedo-S files (P < 0.05) while Kedo-S produced the least (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All instrumentation systems cause apical debris extrusion. Kedo-S produced less apical debris extrusion when compared to the hand files and ProTaper files. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T05:17:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-209cbee91ac24b55b3e2a98a5a2ef759 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0976-237X 0976-2361 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T05:17:58Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-209cbee91ac24b55b3e2a98a5a2ef7592022-12-21T19:14:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612019-01-0110351251610.4103/ccd.ccd_884_18Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro studyAhsana AsifGanesh JeevanandanLavanya GovindarajuR VigneshE M G. SubramanianBackground: The success of endodontic treatment depends on the chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, the debris produced during canal preparation may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation in primary anterior teeth using hand files, rotary ProTaper files, and rotary Kedo-S files. Materials and Methods: Forty-five freshly extracted primary canine with mature apices and a single canal were randomly divided into three groups for instrumentation as follows (n = 15): Group 1: hand files; Group 2: rotary ProTaper files; and Group 3: rotary Kedo-S files. Myers and Montgomery experimental model was used for this study. Apically extruded debris collected in a preweighed Eppendorf tubes was placed in the incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The weight of the debris collected was determined by subtracting the pre- and post-instrumentation weight of the Eppendorf tubes. The data collected were analyzed using the analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc tests. Results: Hand files produced more apical debris extrusion than ProTaper and Kedo-S files (P < 0.05) while Kedo-S produced the least (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All instrumentation systems cause apical debris extrusion. Kedo-S produced less apical debris extrusion when compared to the hand files and ProTaper files.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=3;spage=512;epage=516;aulast=Asifapical extrusionk-fileskedo-sprotaper |
| spellingShingle | Ahsana Asif Ganesh Jeevanandan Lavanya Govindaraju R Vignesh E M G. Subramanian Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study Contemporary Clinical Dentistry apical extrusion k-files kedo-s protaper |
| title | Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files an in vitro study |
| topic | apical extrusion k-files kedo-s protaper |
| url | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2019;volume=10;issue=3;spage=512;epage=516;aulast=Asif |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ahsanaasif comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT ganeshjeevanandan comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT lavanyagovindaraju comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT rvignesh comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy AT emgsubramanian comparativeevaluationofextrusionofapicaldebrisinprimaryanteriorteethusingtwodifferentrotarysystemsandhandfilesaninvitrostudy |