Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
Background: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of S...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Dental Research Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Parisay |
_version_ | 1818852463246049280 |
---|---|
author | Iman Parisay Yegane Khazaei |
author_facet | Iman Parisay Yegane Khazaei |
author_sort | Iman Parisay |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of SSC cemented with four different luting cements.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, A total of 55 extracted primary first molars were selected. Following crown selection and cementation (one with no cement and four groups cemented with resin, glass ionomer, zinc phosphate, and polycarboxylate), all the specimens were incubated and thermocycled in 5°C–55°C. Retentive properties of SSCs were tested with a mechanical test machine. First dislodgement of each specimen and full crown removal were recorded. One-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference test and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for retentive strength comparison at the level of significance of P < 0.05.
Results: The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with zinc phosphate exhibited higher retentive strength as compared to glass ionomer and polycarboxylate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively).
Conclusion: Zinc phosphate cement showed the most promising results; thus, it can be preferably used for cementation of the teeth with no grossly broken down crowns. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T07:21:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-20a192f709cb45dc85ecb212181c922a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1735-3327 2008-0255 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T07:21:19Z |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Dental Research Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-20a192f709cb45dc85ecb212181c922a2022-12-21T20:30:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552018-01-0115320120710.4103/1735-3327.231864Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro studyIman ParisayYegane KhazaeiBackground: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of SSC cemented with four different luting cements. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, A total of 55 extracted primary first molars were selected. Following crown selection and cementation (one with no cement and four groups cemented with resin, glass ionomer, zinc phosphate, and polycarboxylate), all the specimens were incubated and thermocycled in 5°C–55°C. Retentive properties of SSCs were tested with a mechanical test machine. First dislodgement of each specimen and full crown removal were recorded. One-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference test and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for retentive strength comparison at the level of significance of P < 0.05. Results: The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with zinc phosphate exhibited higher retentive strength as compared to glass ionomer and polycarboxylate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). Conclusion: Zinc phosphate cement showed the most promising results; thus, it can be preferably used for cementation of the teeth with no grossly broken down crowns.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=ParisayBond strengthluting cementretentivestrengthstainless steel |
spellingShingle | Iman Parisay Yegane Khazaei Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study Dental Research Journal Bond strength luting cement retentive strength stainless steel |
title | Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study |
title_full | Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study |
title_short | Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study |
title_sort | evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars an in vitro study |
topic | Bond strength luting cement retentive strength stainless steel |
url | http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Parisay |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imanparisay evaluationofretentivestrengthoffourlutingcementswithstainlesssteelcrownsinprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT yeganekhazaei evaluationofretentivestrengthoffourlutingcementswithstainlesssteelcrownsinprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy |