Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study

Background: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iman Parisay, Yegane Khazaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Parisay
_version_ 1818852463246049280
author Iman Parisay
Yegane Khazaei
author_facet Iman Parisay
Yegane Khazaei
author_sort Iman Parisay
collection DOAJ
description Background: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of SSC cemented with four different luting cements. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, A total of 55 extracted primary first molars were selected. Following crown selection and cementation (one with no cement and four groups cemented with resin, glass ionomer, zinc phosphate, and polycarboxylate), all the specimens were incubated and thermocycled in 5°C–55°C. Retentive properties of SSCs were tested with a mechanical test machine. First dislodgement of each specimen and full crown removal were recorded. One-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference test and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for retentive strength comparison at the level of significance of P < 0.05. Results: The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with zinc phosphate exhibited higher retentive strength as compared to glass ionomer and polycarboxylate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). Conclusion: Zinc phosphate cement showed the most promising results; thus, it can be preferably used for cementation of the teeth with no grossly broken down crowns.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:21:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20a192f709cb45dc85ecb212181c922a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:21:19Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Dental Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-20a192f709cb45dc85ecb212181c922a2022-12-21T20:30:56ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552018-01-0115320120710.4103/1735-3327.231864Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro studyIman ParisayYegane KhazaeiBackground: Stainless steel crown (SSC) is the most reliable restoration for primary teeth with extensive caries. Retention is of great importance for a successful restoration and is provided by various factors such as luting cements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive strength of SSC cemented with four different luting cements. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, A total of 55 extracted primary first molars were selected. Following crown selection and cementation (one with no cement and four groups cemented with resin, glass ionomer, zinc phosphate, and polycarboxylate), all the specimens were incubated and thermocycled in 5°C–55°C. Retentive properties of SSCs were tested with a mechanical test machine. First dislodgement of each specimen and full crown removal were recorded. One-way ANOVA test followed by least significant difference test and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for retentive strength comparison at the level of significance of P < 0.05. Results: The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with zinc phosphate exhibited higher retentive strength as compared to glass ionomer and polycarboxylate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). Conclusion: Zinc phosphate cement showed the most promising results; thus, it can be preferably used for cementation of the teeth with no grossly broken down crowns.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=ParisayBond strengthluting cementretentivestrengthstainless steel
spellingShingle Iman Parisay
Yegane Khazaei
Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
Dental Research Journal
Bond strength
luting cement
retentive
strength
stainless steel
title Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
title_full Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
title_short Evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars: An in vitro study
title_sort evaluation of retentive strength of four luting cements with stainless steel crowns in primary molars an in vitro study
topic Bond strength
luting cement
retentive
strength
stainless steel
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2018;volume=15;issue=3;spage=201;epage=207;aulast=Parisay
work_keys_str_mv AT imanparisay evaluationofretentivestrengthoffourlutingcementswithstainlesssteelcrownsinprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy
AT yeganekhazaei evaluationofretentivestrengthoffourlutingcementswithstainlesssteelcrownsinprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy