An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is an attractive technique to help power enterprises with carbon emission reduction. In this paper, a two-stage CCS retrofit investment in an existing coal-fired power plant in China including the first stage (demonstration project) and second stage (comme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herui Cui, Tian Zhao, Ruirui Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1711
_version_ 1818040436540833792
author Herui Cui
Tian Zhao
Ruirui Wu
author_facet Herui Cui
Tian Zhao
Ruirui Wu
author_sort Herui Cui
collection DOAJ
description Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is an attractive technique to help power enterprises with carbon emission reduction. In this paper, a two-stage CCS retrofit investment in an existing coal-fired power plant in China including the first stage (demonstration project) and second stage (commercial operation) is taken as a case to decide when and whether to invest. Distinguished from previous models, a binomial lattice compound real options model including the options to defer and expand is established. Further, the accounting approaches to certified emission reductions (CERs) based on the thermodynamics principle are first proposed concerning this model. We find the total invest value under compound options model is less than zero, although greater than that by NPV method. The results indicate carbon prices and subsidy policy, respectively, play a dominating role in initiating the CCS investment at the first and second stage. The growth in government subsidy at the first stage has obviously greater effects on decreasing critical carbon trading prices. Besides, the minimum critical carbon price is 87.09 RMB/ton with full subsidy, greater than the current price (56 RMB/ton). This also illustrates it is not the optimal occasion to invest in a CCS retrofit project for power enterprises.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:14:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20a264e5fd11455dae838ad02fd81d5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:14:30Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-20a264e5fd11455dae838ad02fd81d5c2022-12-22T01:56:30ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-07-01117171110.3390/en11071711en11071711An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options ModelHerui Cui0Tian Zhao1Ruirui Wu2Department of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Huadian Road No. 689, Baoding 071003, ChinaDepartment of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Huadian Road No. 689, Baoding 071003, ChinaDepartment of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Huadian Road No. 689, Baoding 071003, ChinaCarbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is an attractive technique to help power enterprises with carbon emission reduction. In this paper, a two-stage CCS retrofit investment in an existing coal-fired power plant in China including the first stage (demonstration project) and second stage (commercial operation) is taken as a case to decide when and whether to invest. Distinguished from previous models, a binomial lattice compound real options model including the options to defer and expand is established. Further, the accounting approaches to certified emission reductions (CERs) based on the thermodynamics principle are first proposed concerning this model. We find the total invest value under compound options model is less than zero, although greater than that by NPV method. The results indicate carbon prices and subsidy policy, respectively, play a dominating role in initiating the CCS investment at the first and second stage. The growth in government subsidy at the first stage has obviously greater effects on decreasing critical carbon trading prices. Besides, the minimum critical carbon price is 87.09 RMB/ton with full subsidy, greater than the current price (56 RMB/ton). This also illustrates it is not the optimal occasion to invest in a CCS retrofit project for power enterprises.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1711carbon capture and storage (CCS)compound real optionsinvestment evaluationpower enterprise
spellingShingle Herui Cui
Tian Zhao
Ruirui Wu
An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
Energies
carbon capture and storage (CCS)
compound real options
investment evaluation
power enterprise
title An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
title_full An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
title_fullStr An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
title_full_unstemmed An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
title_short An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model
title_sort investment feasibility analysis of ccs retrofit based on a two stage compound real options model
topic carbon capture and storage (CCS)
compound real options
investment evaluation
power enterprise
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/7/1711
work_keys_str_mv AT heruicui aninvestmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel
AT tianzhao aninvestmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel
AT ruiruiwu aninvestmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel
AT heruicui investmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel
AT tianzhao investmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel
AT ruiruiwu investmentfeasibilityanalysisofccsretrofitbasedonatwostagecompoundrealoptionsmodel