Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population

Limb lengthening has not been widely employed in the elderly population due to concerns that outcomes will be inferior. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective case-control series was to report the bone healing outcomes and complications of lower limb lengthening in older patients (≥60 years)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth P. Powell, Ahmed I. Hammouda, Larysa P. Hlukha, Jessica C. Rivera, Minoo Patel, S. Robert Rozbruch, Janet D. Conway, John E. Herzenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/5242
_version_ 1797494635563581440
author Kenneth P. Powell
Ahmed I. Hammouda
Larysa P. Hlukha
Jessica C. Rivera
Minoo Patel
S. Robert Rozbruch
Janet D. Conway
John E. Herzenberg
author_facet Kenneth P. Powell
Ahmed I. Hammouda
Larysa P. Hlukha
Jessica C. Rivera
Minoo Patel
S. Robert Rozbruch
Janet D. Conway
John E. Herzenberg
author_sort Kenneth P. Powell
collection DOAJ
description Limb lengthening has not been widely employed in the elderly population due to concerns that outcomes will be inferior. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective case-control series was to report the bone healing outcomes and complications of lower limb lengthening in older patients (≥60 years) using magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN). Our hypothesis was that healing parameters including consolidation days, the consolidation index, maturation days, and the maturation index, as well as the number of adverse events reported in the older population, would be no different to those of the general adult population. We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs from patients ≥60 years of age with limb-length discrepancies who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening using a MILN. Parameters were compared among the age categories “≤19 years,” “20–39 years,” “40–59 years,” or “≥60 years” and propensity-matched cohorts for the age groups 20–59 years and ≥60 years. Complications were reported as percentages for each age category. In the study period, 354 MILN were placed in 257 patients. Sixteen nails were placed in patients 60 years of age or older (mean 65 ± 5 years; range 60–72 years). Comparisons of healing parameters showed no difference between those aged 60+ and the younger cohort. Complication percentages were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.816). Limb lengthening with MILN may therefore be considered a safe and feasible option for a generally healthy elderly population.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:37:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20a2fb8355884550bb891ef90ddac043
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:37:10Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-20a2fb8355884550bb891ef90ddac0432023-11-23T13:30:10ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-09-011117524210.3390/jcm11175242Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older PopulationKenneth P. Powell0Ahmed I. Hammouda1Larysa P. Hlukha2Jessica C. Rivera3Minoo Patel4S. Robert Rozbruch5Janet D. Conway6John E. Herzenberg7Shriners Hospital for Children, Shreverport, LA 71103, USADepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo 11511, EgyptInternational Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USAInternational Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USACentre for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Richmond, VIC 3121, AustraliaHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USAInternational Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USAInternational Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD 21215, USALimb lengthening has not been widely employed in the elderly population due to concerns that outcomes will be inferior. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective case-control series was to report the bone healing outcomes and complications of lower limb lengthening in older patients (≥60 years) using magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail (MILN). Our hypothesis was that healing parameters including consolidation days, the consolidation index, maturation days, and the maturation index, as well as the number of adverse events reported in the older population, would be no different to those of the general adult population. We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs from patients ≥60 years of age with limb-length discrepancies who underwent femoral or tibial lengthening using a MILN. Parameters were compared among the age categories “≤19 years,” “20–39 years,” “40–59 years,” or “≥60 years” and propensity-matched cohorts for the age groups 20–59 years and ≥60 years. Complications were reported as percentages for each age category. In the study period, 354 MILN were placed in 257 patients. Sixteen nails were placed in patients 60 years of age or older (mean 65 ± 5 years; range 60–72 years). Comparisons of healing parameters showed no difference between those aged 60+ and the younger cohort. Complication percentages were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.816). Limb lengthening with MILN may therefore be considered a safe and feasible option for a generally healthy elderly population.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/5242bone lengtheninggeriatricintramedullary lengthening naillimb length discrepancyPrecice
spellingShingle Kenneth P. Powell
Ahmed I. Hammouda
Larysa P. Hlukha
Jessica C. Rivera
Minoo Patel
S. Robert Rozbruch
Janet D. Conway
John E. Herzenberg
Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
Journal of Clinical Medicine
bone lengthening
geriatric
intramedullary lengthening nail
limb length discrepancy
Precice
title Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
title_full Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
title_fullStr Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
title_full_unstemmed Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
title_short Motorized Intramedullary Nail Lengthening in the Older Population
title_sort motorized intramedullary nail lengthening in the older population
topic bone lengthening
geriatric
intramedullary lengthening nail
limb length discrepancy
Precice
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/17/5242
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethppowell motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT ahmedihammouda motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT larysaphlukha motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT jessicacrivera motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT minoopatel motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT srobertrozbruch motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT janetdconway motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation
AT johneherzenberg motorizedintramedullarynaillengtheningintheolderpopulation