Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach

Due to the strong noise that exists in GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) temporal gravity field solutions, geophysical signals are normally drowned which need many effective filtering approaches. Considering the advantage of the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) approach, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Changmin Huan, Fengwei Wang, Shijian Zhou, Xiaomeng Qiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1132862/full
_version_ 1811157670617415680
author Changmin Huan
Fengwei Wang
Shijian Zhou
Xiaomeng Qiu
author_facet Changmin Huan
Fengwei Wang
Shijian Zhou
Xiaomeng Qiu
author_sort Changmin Huan
collection DOAJ
description Due to the strong noise that exists in GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) temporal gravity field solutions, geophysical signals are normally drowned which need many effective filtering approaches. Considering the advantage of the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) approach, we used the EEMD to filter the noise in this study together with the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for comparisons. EMD method is a spectrum analysis method, which is very effective for non-stationary signals. EMD process is essentially a means to process non-stationary signals. It has been applied in many fields in recent years. Considering the characteristics of the spherical harmonic coefficient model that the noise level higher with the increasing degree, we divided the gravity field solutions into two parts (degrees 2–28 and degrees 29–60) based on the ratios of the latitude-weighted root mean square (RMS) over the land and ocean signals when adopting different truncated degrees. For the real GRACE solution experiments, the results show that the fitting errors of EEMD approach are always smaller than those of EMD approach, and the mean RMS ratio of EEMD is 3.45, larger than 3.40 of EMD. The simulation results show that the latitude weighted root mean square errors for EEMD approach are smaller than those of EMD, indicating that EEMD can extract the geophysical signals more accurately. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that EEMD performs better than EMD for filtering GRACE solutions.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:11:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20b32759244e49d28f402a9d52925098
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:11:15Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-20b32759244e49d28f402a9d529250982023-03-09T07:24:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632023-03-011110.3389/feart.2023.11328621132862Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approachChangmin Huan0Fengwei Wang1Shijian Zhou2Xiaomeng Qiu3College of Surveying and Mapping Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai, ChinaNanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, ChinaGandong College, Fuzhou, ChinaDue to the strong noise that exists in GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) temporal gravity field solutions, geophysical signals are normally drowned which need many effective filtering approaches. Considering the advantage of the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) approach, we used the EEMD to filter the noise in this study together with the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for comparisons. EMD method is a spectrum analysis method, which is very effective for non-stationary signals. EMD process is essentially a means to process non-stationary signals. It has been applied in many fields in recent years. Considering the characteristics of the spherical harmonic coefficient model that the noise level higher with the increasing degree, we divided the gravity field solutions into two parts (degrees 2–28 and degrees 29–60) based on the ratios of the latitude-weighted root mean square (RMS) over the land and ocean signals when adopting different truncated degrees. For the real GRACE solution experiments, the results show that the fitting errors of EEMD approach are always smaller than those of EMD approach, and the mean RMS ratio of EEMD is 3.45, larger than 3.40 of EMD. The simulation results show that the latitude weighted root mean square errors for EEMD approach are smaller than those of EMD, indicating that EEMD can extract the geophysical signals more accurately. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that EEMD performs better than EMD for filtering GRACE solutions.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1132862/fullGRACEensemble empirical mode decompositionequivalent water heightcombined filteringtime variable gravity
spellingShingle Changmin Huan
Fengwei Wang
Shijian Zhou
Xiaomeng Qiu
Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
Frontiers in Earth Science
GRACE
ensemble empirical mode decomposition
equivalent water height
combined filtering
time variable gravity
title Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
title_full Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
title_fullStr Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
title_full_unstemmed Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
title_short Filtering GRACE temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
title_sort filtering grace temporal gravity field solutions using ensemble empirical mode decomposition approach
topic GRACE
ensemble empirical mode decomposition
equivalent water height
combined filtering
time variable gravity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1132862/full
work_keys_str_mv AT changminhuan filteringgracetemporalgravityfieldsolutionsusingensembleempiricalmodedecompositionapproach
AT fengweiwang filteringgracetemporalgravityfieldsolutionsusingensembleempiricalmodedecompositionapproach
AT shijianzhou filteringgracetemporalgravityfieldsolutionsusingensembleempiricalmodedecompositionapproach
AT xiaomengqiu filteringgracetemporalgravityfieldsolutionsusingensembleempiricalmodedecompositionapproach