The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice

Employee voice plays a crucial role in driving constructive change within organizations. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the distinct antecedents of different types of voice behaviors, namely promotive and prohibitive voice. This study aims to address this gap by examining the in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaoyu Wang, Jeeyoung Kim, Myung-Ho Chung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231220387
_version_ 1797375360993591296
author Chaoyu Wang
Jeeyoung Kim
Myung-Ho Chung
author_facet Chaoyu Wang
Jeeyoung Kim
Myung-Ho Chung
author_sort Chaoyu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Employee voice plays a crucial role in driving constructive change within organizations. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the distinct antecedents of different types of voice behaviors, namely promotive and prohibitive voice. This study aims to address this gap by examining the influence of interpersonal factors, such as leader-member exchange (LMX), and individual factors, specifically regulatory focus, on both types of voice behavior. By focusing on LMX and regulatory focus, we explore how these factors uniquely and interactively affect promotive and prohibitive voice. The study collected data from 167 Chinese employees in Guangdong province and Hong Kong. Our findings reveal a positive linear relationship between LMX and promotive voice, indicating that a strong leader-member relationship enhances employees’ willingness to contribute proactive ideas and suggestions. In contrast, we observed a curvilinear relationship between LMX and prohibitive voice, consistent with the “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect. Furthermore, our study examines the unique effects of promotion and prevention focus on promotive and prohibitive voice, respectively. However, we did not find significant interaction effects between LMX and regulatory focus on voice behavior. These results suggest that the impact of LMX and regulatory focus on voice behavior operates independently rather than in combination. Theoretical implications of our findings contribute to the understanding of voice behavior, leadership, and regulatory focus literature.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:23:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20b61f6f61ce4a428fb9321b69539db4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-2440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:23:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series SAGE Open
spelling doaj.art-20b61f6f61ce4a428fb9321b69539db42023-12-26T11:05:09ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402023-12-011310.1177/21582440231220387The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive VoiceChaoyu Wang0Jeeyoung Kim1Myung-Ho Chung2Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South KoreaEwha Womans University, Seoul, South KoreaEwha Womans University, Seoul, South KoreaEmployee voice plays a crucial role in driving constructive change within organizations. However, there is a lack of understanding regarding the distinct antecedents of different types of voice behaviors, namely promotive and prohibitive voice. This study aims to address this gap by examining the influence of interpersonal factors, such as leader-member exchange (LMX), and individual factors, specifically regulatory focus, on both types of voice behavior. By focusing on LMX and regulatory focus, we explore how these factors uniquely and interactively affect promotive and prohibitive voice. The study collected data from 167 Chinese employees in Guangdong province and Hong Kong. Our findings reveal a positive linear relationship between LMX and promotive voice, indicating that a strong leader-member relationship enhances employees’ willingness to contribute proactive ideas and suggestions. In contrast, we observed a curvilinear relationship between LMX and prohibitive voice, consistent with the “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect. Furthermore, our study examines the unique effects of promotion and prevention focus on promotive and prohibitive voice, respectively. However, we did not find significant interaction effects between LMX and regulatory focus on voice behavior. These results suggest that the impact of LMX and regulatory focus on voice behavior operates independently rather than in combination. Theoretical implications of our findings contribute to the understanding of voice behavior, leadership, and regulatory focus literature.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231220387
spellingShingle Chaoyu Wang
Jeeyoung Kim
Myung-Ho Chung
The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
SAGE Open
title The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
title_full The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
title_fullStr The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
title_short The Differential Effects of LMX and Regulatory Focus on Promotive and Prohibitive Voice
title_sort differential effects of lmx and regulatory focus on promotive and prohibitive voice
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231220387
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoyuwang thedifferentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice
AT jeeyoungkim thedifferentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice
AT myunghochung thedifferentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice
AT chaoyuwang differentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice
AT jeeyoungkim differentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice
AT myunghochung differentialeffectsoflmxandregulatoryfocusonpromotiveandprohibitivevoice