Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada
Decision-making in the Settlement of Local Election Dispute at the Constitutional Court is based on the conviction of the justices after examining evidence submitted by the parties. Meanwhile, the law has limited the authority of the Court which is simply to rule on the result of vote count in the...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/151 |
| _version_ | 1797900745906847744 |
|---|---|
| author | Helmi Kasim Syukri Asy’ari Meyrinda R. Hilipito Rio Tri Juli Putranto |
| author_facet | Helmi Kasim Syukri Asy’ari Meyrinda R. Hilipito Rio Tri Juli Putranto |
| author_sort | Helmi Kasim |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Decision-making in the Settlement of Local Election Dispute at the Constitutional Court is based on the conviction of the justices after examining evidence submitted by the parties. Meanwhile, the law has limited the authority of the Court which is simply to rule on the result of vote count in the local election. Therefore, through interpretation, the Court has created new norms in its decision concerning local election.
In some of its decisions, the Court broadened its authority in the settlement of local election dispute which is to include the process of the election. The dictum of the decision does not merely follow what is stated in the law. There is compatibility in the justices’ conviction based on interpretation done by the justices regarding the authority of the Court in deciding Local Election Dispute and in the choice of dictum of the decision which is different from what has been stated by the law.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:50:55Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-20c78617638e48ec9b373e0f4f900de6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:50:55Z |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj.art-20c78617638e48ec9b373e0f4f900de62023-02-22T04:12:24ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572016-05-019410.31078/jk946151Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan PemilukadaHelmi Kasim0Syukri Asy’ari1Meyrinda R. Hilipito2Rio Tri Juli Putranto3Peneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 JakartaPeneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 JakartaPeneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 JakartaPeneliti pada Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta Decision-making in the Settlement of Local Election Dispute at the Constitutional Court is based on the conviction of the justices after examining evidence submitted by the parties. Meanwhile, the law has limited the authority of the Court which is simply to rule on the result of vote count in the local election. Therefore, through interpretation, the Court has created new norms in its decision concerning local election. In some of its decisions, the Court broadened its authority in the settlement of local election dispute which is to include the process of the election. The dictum of the decision does not merely follow what is stated in the law. There is compatibility in the justices’ conviction based on interpretation done by the justices regarding the authority of the Court in deciding Local Election Dispute and in the choice of dictum of the decision which is different from what has been stated by the law. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/151Examination of EvidenceInterpretationConstitutional Court |
| spellingShingle | Helmi Kasim Syukri Asy’ari Meyrinda R. Hilipito Rio Tri Juli Putranto Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada Jurnal Konstitusi Examination of Evidence Interpretation Constitutional Court |
| title | Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada |
| title_full | Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada |
| title_fullStr | Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada |
| title_short | Kompatibilitas Metode Pembuktian dan Penafsiran Hakim Konstitusi dalam Putusan Pemilukada |
| title_sort | kompatibilitas metode pembuktian dan penafsiran hakim konstitusi dalam putusan pemilukada |
| topic | Examination of Evidence Interpretation Constitutional Court |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/151 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT helmikasim kompatibilitasmetodepembuktiandanpenafsiranhakimkonstitusidalamputusanpemilukada AT syukriasyari kompatibilitasmetodepembuktiandanpenafsiranhakimkonstitusidalamputusanpemilukada AT meyrindarhilipito kompatibilitasmetodepembuktiandanpenafsiranhakimkonstitusidalamputusanpemilukada AT riotrijuliputranto kompatibilitasmetodepembuktiandanpenafsiranhakimkonstitusidalamputusanpemilukada |