A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser

Laser-induced graphene (LIG) is an emerging technique for producing few-layer graphene or graphene-like material that has recently received increasing attention, due to its unique advantages. Subsequently, a variety of lasers and materials have been used to fabricate LIG using this technique. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liyong Wang, Zhiwen Wang, Ali Naderi Bakhtiyari, Hongyu Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Micromachines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/11/12/1094
_version_ 1797544999242432512
author Liyong Wang
Zhiwen Wang
Ali Naderi Bakhtiyari
Hongyu Zheng
author_facet Liyong Wang
Zhiwen Wang
Ali Naderi Bakhtiyari
Hongyu Zheng
author_sort Liyong Wang
collection DOAJ
description Laser-induced graphene (LIG) is an emerging technique for producing few-layer graphene or graphene-like material that has recently received increasing attention, due to its unique advantages. Subsequently, a variety of lasers and materials have been used to fabricate LIG using this technique. However, there is a lack of understanding of how different lasers (wavelengths) perform differently in the LIG conversion process. In this study, the produced LIG on polyimide (PI) under a locally water-cooled condition using a 10.6 μm CO<sub>2</sub> infrared laser and a 355 nm ultraviolet (UV) laser are compared. The experimental investigations reveal that under the same UV and CO<sub>2</sub> laser fluence, the ablation of PI show different results. Surface morphologies with micron-sized and nanometer pores were formed by the UV laser under different laser fluences, whereas micron-sized pores and sheet structure with fewer pores were produced by the CO<sub>2</sub> laser. Energy dispersive spectrometry and three-dimensional topography characterization indicate that the photochemical effects were also involved in the LIG conversion with UV laser irradiation. It is also observed through experiments that the photothermal effect contributed to the formation of LIG under both lasers, and the LIG formed on PI substrates by the CO<sub>2</sub> laser showed better quality and fewer layers.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:09:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20c806509f35483fa73fcd61f8f0feba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-666X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:09:28Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Micromachines
spelling doaj.art-20c806509f35483fa73fcd61f8f0feba2023-11-21T00:18:56ZengMDPI AGMicromachines2072-666X2020-12-011112109410.3390/mi11121094A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) LaserLiyong Wang0Zhiwen Wang1Ali Naderi Bakhtiyari2Hongyu Zheng3Centre for Advanced Laser Manufacturing (CALM), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, ChinaCentre for Advanced Laser Manufacturing (CALM), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, ChinaCentre for Advanced Laser Manufacturing (CALM), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, ChinaCentre for Advanced Laser Manufacturing (CALM), School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, ChinaLaser-induced graphene (LIG) is an emerging technique for producing few-layer graphene or graphene-like material that has recently received increasing attention, due to its unique advantages. Subsequently, a variety of lasers and materials have been used to fabricate LIG using this technique. However, there is a lack of understanding of how different lasers (wavelengths) perform differently in the LIG conversion process. In this study, the produced LIG on polyimide (PI) under a locally water-cooled condition using a 10.6 μm CO<sub>2</sub> infrared laser and a 355 nm ultraviolet (UV) laser are compared. The experimental investigations reveal that under the same UV and CO<sub>2</sub> laser fluence, the ablation of PI show different results. Surface morphologies with micron-sized and nanometer pores were formed by the UV laser under different laser fluences, whereas micron-sized pores and sheet structure with fewer pores were produced by the CO<sub>2</sub> laser. Energy dispersive spectrometry and three-dimensional topography characterization indicate that the photochemical effects were also involved in the LIG conversion with UV laser irradiation. It is also observed through experiments that the photothermal effect contributed to the formation of LIG under both lasers, and the LIG formed on PI substrates by the CO<sub>2</sub> laser showed better quality and fewer layers.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/11/12/1094laser-induced graphene (LIG)surface morphologiespolyimide
spellingShingle Liyong Wang
Zhiwen Wang
Ali Naderi Bakhtiyari
Hongyu Zheng
A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
Micromachines
laser-induced graphene (LIG)
surface morphologies
polyimide
title A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
title_full A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
title_short A Comparative Study of Laser-Induced Graphene by CO<sub>2</sub> Infrared Laser and 355 nm Ultraviolet (UV) Laser
title_sort comparative study of laser induced graphene by co sub 2 sub infrared laser and 355 nm ultraviolet uv laser
topic laser-induced graphene (LIG)
surface morphologies
polyimide
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/11/12/1094
work_keys_str_mv AT liyongwang acomparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT zhiwenwang acomparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT alinaderibakhtiyari acomparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT hongyuzheng acomparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT liyongwang comparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT zhiwenwang comparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT alinaderibakhtiyari comparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser
AT hongyuzheng comparativestudyoflaserinducedgraphenebycosub2subinfraredlaserand355nmultravioletuvlaser