Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study

Abstract Introduction Research indicates radiation therapy students are at risk of burnout. Peer Group Supervision (PGS) is a tool used to help reduce stress, increase reflective practice and help manage professional issues. This pilot study aimed to investigate the third‐year New Zealand radiation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gay M. Dungey, Phoebe H. Bates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.527
_version_ 1818573321467330560
author Gay M. Dungey
Phoebe H. Bates
author_facet Gay M. Dungey
Phoebe H. Bates
author_sort Gay M. Dungey
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Research indicates radiation therapy students are at risk of burnout. Peer Group Supervision (PGS) is a tool used to help reduce stress, increase reflective practice and help manage professional issues. This pilot study aimed to investigate the third‐year New Zealand radiation therapy students' perceptions of participating in PGS. Methods In 2019, all 27 third‐year radiation therapy students were introduced to PGS. At the end of the year, the students were invited to fill in a 14‐item Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire (CSEQ), answer an open‐ended question and provide demographic data. The CSEQ asks participants to indicate the extent to which they agree with 14 statements related to Purpose, Process and Impact of PGS. The open‐ended question asked if there were anything else they would like to say about participating in PGS as a student. The study utilised both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results Of the 27 students invited, 22 responded to the questionnaire. Analysis of the CSEQ revealed that eight of the 22 students (36.4%) had a positive impression of PGS, 13 (59.1%) were neither positive nor negative, and one (4.6%) had a negative perception of PGS. The thematic data showed that the students perceived PGS to assist with stress management. They valued having scheduled time out to reflect on practice and appreciated the safety and trust established in the groups. Conclusion Overall, the radiation therapy students responded positively to PGS. The students felt safe talking about clinical issues in their groups, and they perceive PGS to positively affect their stress management, resulting in new clinical insights and increased self‐awareness. Further research is required to examine the long‐term effects of PGS on patient care and if PGS can help reduce burnout for student radiation therapists.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:09:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20e5c6e0b5bf4c6fb4dca45e0338d794
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-3895
2051-3909
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:09:37Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
spelling doaj.art-20e5c6e0b5bf4c6fb4dca45e0338d7942022-12-21T22:42:37ZengWileyJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences2051-38952051-39092021-12-0168442643410.1002/jmrs.527Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot studyGay M. Dungey0Phoebe H. Bates1Department of Radiation Therapy University of Otago Wellington New ZealandDepartment of Radiation Therapy University of Otago Wellington New ZealandAbstract Introduction Research indicates radiation therapy students are at risk of burnout. Peer Group Supervision (PGS) is a tool used to help reduce stress, increase reflective practice and help manage professional issues. This pilot study aimed to investigate the third‐year New Zealand radiation therapy students' perceptions of participating in PGS. Methods In 2019, all 27 third‐year radiation therapy students were introduced to PGS. At the end of the year, the students were invited to fill in a 14‐item Clinical Supervision Evaluation Questionnaire (CSEQ), answer an open‐ended question and provide demographic data. The CSEQ asks participants to indicate the extent to which they agree with 14 statements related to Purpose, Process and Impact of PGS. The open‐ended question asked if there were anything else they would like to say about participating in PGS as a student. The study utilised both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results Of the 27 students invited, 22 responded to the questionnaire. Analysis of the CSEQ revealed that eight of the 22 students (36.4%) had a positive impression of PGS, 13 (59.1%) were neither positive nor negative, and one (4.6%) had a negative perception of PGS. The thematic data showed that the students perceived PGS to assist with stress management. They valued having scheduled time out to reflect on practice and appreciated the safety and trust established in the groups. Conclusion Overall, the radiation therapy students responded positively to PGS. The students felt safe talking about clinical issues in their groups, and they perceive PGS to positively affect their stress management, resulting in new clinical insights and increased self‐awareness. Further research is required to examine the long‐term effects of PGS on patient care and if PGS can help reduce burnout for student radiation therapists.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.527Burnoutpeer‐supervisionradiation therapistsstudentssupport
spellingShingle Gay M. Dungey
Phoebe H. Bates
Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Burnout
peer‐supervision
radiation therapists
students
support
title Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
title_full Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
title_fullStr Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
title_short Radiation therapy students' perceptions of peer group supervision: a pilot study
title_sort radiation therapy students perceptions of peer group supervision a pilot study
topic Burnout
peer‐supervision
radiation therapists
students
support
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.527
work_keys_str_mv AT gaymdungey radiationtherapystudentsperceptionsofpeergroupsupervisionapilotstudy
AT phoebehbates radiationtherapystudentsperceptionsofpeergroupsupervisionapilotstudy