Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count

This article argues for communication for social change theory to be based on a theory of knowledge, a specific understanding of process that feeds into practice, a knowledge of structures, a specific understanding of context and flows of power. It highlights the example of the Right to Information...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Pradip Ninan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-07-01
Series:Nordicom Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0030
_version_ 1797712521052815360
author Thomas Pradip Ninan
author_facet Thomas Pradip Ninan
author_sort Thomas Pradip Ninan
collection DOAJ
description This article argues for communication for social change theory to be based on a theory of knowledge, a specific understanding of process that feeds into practice, a knowledge of structures, a specific understanding of context and flows of power. It highlights the example of the Right to Information Movement in India as an embodiment of meaningful practice that was in itself a response to the felt needs of people. It argues that the RTI movement provided opportunities to understand Voice as a practice and value through indigenous means, specifically through the mechanism of the Jan Sunwai (Public Hearings). It argues that when local people are involved in articulating ‘needs’, there will be scope for the sustainability of the practice of communication and social change and opportunities to theorise from such practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20e747cb0b7e462abf766327b8745030
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2001-5119
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T07:22:59Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Nordicom Review
spelling doaj.art-20e747cb0b7e462abf766327b87450302023-09-02T22:16:43ZengSciendoNordicom Review2001-51192020-07-0136s1717810.1515/nor-2015-0030Communication for Social Change, Making Theory CountThomas Pradip NinanThis article argues for communication for social change theory to be based on a theory of knowledge, a specific understanding of process that feeds into practice, a knowledge of structures, a specific understanding of context and flows of power. It highlights the example of the Right to Information Movement in India as an embodiment of meaningful practice that was in itself a response to the felt needs of people. It argues that the RTI movement provided opportunities to understand Voice as a practice and value through indigenous means, specifically through the mechanism of the Jan Sunwai (Public Hearings). It argues that when local people are involved in articulating ‘needs’, there will be scope for the sustainability of the practice of communication and social change and opportunities to theorise from such practice.https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0030communication for social changevoiceright to informationpublic hearingspolitical economydevelopment
spellingShingle Thomas Pradip Ninan
Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
Nordicom Review
communication for social change
voice
right to information
public hearings
political economy
development
title Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
title_full Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
title_fullStr Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
title_full_unstemmed Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
title_short Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count
title_sort communication for social change making theory count
topic communication for social change
voice
right to information
public hearings
political economy
development
url https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2015-0030
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaspradipninan communicationforsocialchangemakingtheorycount