Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy

Pilocarpine-induced (320 mg/kg, ip) status epilepticus (SE) in adult (2-3 months) male Wistar rats results in extensive neuronal damage in limbic structures. Here we investigated whether the induction of a second SE (N = 6) would generate damage and cell loss similar to that seen after a first SE (N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. Covolan, L.E. Mello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2006-07-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006000700010
_version_ 1818299044791844864
author L. Covolan
L.E. Mello
author_facet L. Covolan
L.E. Mello
author_sort L. Covolan
collection DOAJ
description Pilocarpine-induced (320 mg/kg, ip) status epilepticus (SE) in adult (2-3 months) male Wistar rats results in extensive neuronal damage in limbic structures. Here we investigated whether the induction of a second SE (N = 6) would generate damage and cell loss similar to that seen after a first SE (N = 9). Counts of silver-stained (indicative of cell damage) cells, using the Gallyas argyrophil III method, revealed a markedly lower neuronal injury in animals submitted to re-induction of SE compared to rats exposed to a single episode of pilocarpine-induced SE. This effect could be explained as follows: 1) the first SE removes the vulnerable cells, leaving behind resistant cells that are not affected by the second SE; 2) the first SE confers increased resistance to the remaining cells, analogous to the process of ischemic tolerance. Counting of Nissl-stained cells was performed to differentiate between these alternative mechanisms. Our data indicate that different neuronal populations react differently to SE induction. For some brain areas most, if not all, of the vulnerable cells are lost after an initial insult leaving only relatively resistant cells and little space for further damage or cell loss. For some other brain areas, in contrast, our data support the hypothesis that surviving cells might be modified by the initial insult which would confer a sort of excitotoxic tolerance. As a consequence of both mechanisms, subsequent insults after an initial insult result in very little damage regardless of their intensity.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T04:44:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-20fc29c29ec74d64b9f949df1793c812
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-879X
1414-431X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T04:44:58Z
publishDate 2006-07-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
spelling doaj.art-20fc29c29ec74d64b9f949df1793c8122022-12-21T23:59:10ZengAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research0100-879X1414-431X2006-07-0139791592410.1590/S0100-879X2006000700010Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsyL. CovolanL.E. MelloPilocarpine-induced (320 mg/kg, ip) status epilepticus (SE) in adult (2-3 months) male Wistar rats results in extensive neuronal damage in limbic structures. Here we investigated whether the induction of a second SE (N = 6) would generate damage and cell loss similar to that seen after a first SE (N = 9). Counts of silver-stained (indicative of cell damage) cells, using the Gallyas argyrophil III method, revealed a markedly lower neuronal injury in animals submitted to re-induction of SE compared to rats exposed to a single episode of pilocarpine-induced SE. This effect could be explained as follows: 1) the first SE removes the vulnerable cells, leaving behind resistant cells that are not affected by the second SE; 2) the first SE confers increased resistance to the remaining cells, analogous to the process of ischemic tolerance. Counting of Nissl-stained cells was performed to differentiate between these alternative mechanisms. Our data indicate that different neuronal populations react differently to SE induction. For some brain areas most, if not all, of the vulnerable cells are lost after an initial insult leaving only relatively resistant cells and little space for further damage or cell loss. For some other brain areas, in contrast, our data support the hypothesis that surviving cells might be modified by the initial insult which would confer a sort of excitotoxic tolerance. As a consequence of both mechanisms, subsequent insults after an initial insult result in very little damage regardless of their intensity.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006000700010Cell injuryStatus epilepticusEpilepsyPilocarpineSpontaneous seizures
spellingShingle L. Covolan
L.E. Mello
Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Cell injury
Status epilepticus
Epilepsy
Pilocarpine
Spontaneous seizures
title Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
title_full Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
title_fullStr Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
title_short Assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
title_sort assessment of the progressive nature of cell damage in the pilocarpine model of epilepsy
topic Cell injury
Status epilepticus
Epilepsy
Pilocarpine
Spontaneous seizures
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2006000700010
work_keys_str_mv AT lcovolan assessmentoftheprogressivenatureofcelldamageinthepilocarpinemodelofepilepsy
AT lemello assessmentoftheprogressivenatureofcelldamageinthepilocarpinemodelofepilepsy