5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Background: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI) is a recent technique that allows PWV to be measured along the entire aorta (aPWVMRI), as well as in regions of interest. The aim of this study was to te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S.S. Hickson, M. Butlin, M. Graves, I.B. Wilkinson, C.M. McEniery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927355/view
_version_ 1818149793956888576
author S.S. Hickson
M. Butlin
M. Graves
I.B. Wilkinson
C.M. McEniery
author_facet S.S. Hickson
M. Butlin
M. Graves
I.B. Wilkinson
C.M. McEniery
author_sort S.S. Hickson
collection DOAJ
description Background: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI) is a recent technique that allows PWV to be measured along the entire aorta (aPWVMRI), as well as in regions of interest. The aim of this study was to test the repeatability of PWV assessed by MRI, and to validate this against carotid-femoral PWV using the Vicorder device (PWVVicorder) measured simultaneously to aPWVMRI. Methods: 147 subjects aged 18–85 years were recruited from the ACCT and ENIGMA Studies. All subjects were free of cardiovascular disease and medication. A PCMRI sequence (1.5T scanner, GE) was performed at two sites (1cm above the aortic valve, and 3cm above the aortic bifurcation) to determine aPWVMRI. Brachial supine blood pressure and PWVVicorder were measured in the scanner simultaneous to image acquisition. Repeatability of PWVMRI was assessed across 2 visits, in a subset of 10 subjects. Results: PWVMRI showed good repeatability (mean difference = −0.4±2.1m/s). There was a strong correlation between aPWVMRI and PWVVicorder (R=0.64, P<0.001), although, overall, aPWVMRI was significantly lower than PWVVicorder (5.7±1.8 vs. 7.1±1.4m/s, P<0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of PWV using PCMRI are reproducible and correlate with simultaneously measured carotid-femoral PWV.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T13:12:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2102a5d526774d67a82d424b5a5b6ba1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T13:12:41Z
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-2102a5d526774d67a82d424b5a5b6ba12022-12-22T01:06:08ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012009-12-013410.1016/j.artres.2009.10.1625.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGINGS.S. HicksonM. ButlinM. GravesI.B. WilkinsonC.M. McEnieryBackground: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PCMRI) is a recent technique that allows PWV to be measured along the entire aorta (aPWVMRI), as well as in regions of interest. The aim of this study was to test the repeatability of PWV assessed by MRI, and to validate this against carotid-femoral PWV using the Vicorder device (PWVVicorder) measured simultaneously to aPWVMRI. Methods: 147 subjects aged 18–85 years were recruited from the ACCT and ENIGMA Studies. All subjects were free of cardiovascular disease and medication. A PCMRI sequence (1.5T scanner, GE) was performed at two sites (1cm above the aortic valve, and 3cm above the aortic bifurcation) to determine aPWVMRI. Brachial supine blood pressure and PWVVicorder were measured in the scanner simultaneous to image acquisition. Repeatability of PWVMRI was assessed across 2 visits, in a subset of 10 subjects. Results: PWVMRI showed good repeatability (mean difference = −0.4±2.1m/s). There was a strong correlation between aPWVMRI and PWVVicorder (R=0.64, P<0.001), although, overall, aPWVMRI was significantly lower than PWVVicorder (5.7±1.8 vs. 7.1±1.4m/s, P<0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of PWV using PCMRI are reproducible and correlate with simultaneously measured carotid-femoral PWV.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927355/view
spellingShingle S.S. Hickson
M. Butlin
M. Graves
I.B. Wilkinson
C.M. McEniery
5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Artery Research
title 5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
title_full 5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
title_fullStr 5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
title_full_unstemmed 5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
title_short 5.4 THE REPEATABILITY AND VALIDITY OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY MEASURED USING PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
title_sort 5 4 the repeatability and validity of pulse wave velocity measured using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125927355/view
work_keys_str_mv AT sshickson 54therepeatabilityandvalidityofpulsewavevelocitymeasuredusingphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mbutlin 54therepeatabilityandvalidityofpulsewavevelocitymeasuredusingphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mgraves 54therepeatabilityandvalidityofpulsewavevelocitymeasuredusingphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ibwilkinson 54therepeatabilityandvalidityofpulsewavevelocitymeasuredusingphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT cmmceniery 54therepeatabilityandvalidityofpulsewavevelocitymeasuredusingphasecontrastmagneticresonanceimaging