Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Australian policy context is lacking. In this study, a pilot population-based screening program in Australia was used to model the cost-effectiveness of NBS for SCID from the government p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophy T. F. Shih, Elena Keller, Veronica Wiley, Melanie Wong, Michelle A. Farrar, Georgina M. Chambers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-515X/8/3/44
_version_ 1797486948129964032
author Sophy T. F. Shih
Elena Keller
Veronica Wiley
Melanie Wong
Michelle A. Farrar
Georgina M. Chambers
author_facet Sophy T. F. Shih
Elena Keller
Veronica Wiley
Melanie Wong
Michelle A. Farrar
Georgina M. Chambers
author_sort Sophy T. F. Shih
collection DOAJ
description Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Australian policy context is lacking. In this study, a pilot population-based screening program in Australia was used to model the cost-effectiveness of NBS for SCID from the government perspective. Markov cohort simulations were nested within a decision analytic model to compare the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a time horizon of 5 and 60 years for two strategies: (1) NBS for SCID and treat with early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); (2) no NBS for SCID and treat with late HSCT. Incremental costs were compared to incremental QALYs to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model uncertainty and identify key parameters impacting on the ICER. In the long-term over 60 years, universal NBS for SCID would gain 10 QALYs at a cost of US $0.3 million, resulting in an ICER of US$33,600/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that more than half of the simulated ICERs were considered cost-effective against the common willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000/QALY (US$35,000/QALY). In the Australian context, screening for SCID should be introduced into the current NBS program from both clinical and economic perspectives.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:40:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2113b25f829940a7abd4d3c1d48b1545
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-515X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:40:36Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Neonatal Screening
spelling doaj.art-2113b25f829940a7abd4d3c1d48b15452023-11-23T16:51:49ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Neonatal Screening2409-515X2022-07-01834410.3390/ijns8030044Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined ImmunodeficiencySophy T. F. Shih0Elena Keller1Veronica Wiley2Melanie Wong3Michelle A. Farrar4Georgina M. Chambers5Surveillance, Evaluation and Research Program, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaNational Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaNSW Newborn Screening Programme, Children’s Hospital Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaDepartment of Neurology, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, AustraliaNational Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaEvidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Australian policy context is lacking. In this study, a pilot population-based screening program in Australia was used to model the cost-effectiveness of NBS for SCID from the government perspective. Markov cohort simulations were nested within a decision analytic model to compare the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a time horizon of 5 and 60 years for two strategies: (1) NBS for SCID and treat with early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); (2) no NBS for SCID and treat with late HSCT. Incremental costs were compared to incremental QALYs to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model uncertainty and identify key parameters impacting on the ICER. In the long-term over 60 years, universal NBS for SCID would gain 10 QALYs at a cost of US $0.3 million, resulting in an ICER of US$33,600/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that more than half of the simulated ICERs were considered cost-effective against the common willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50,000/QALY (US$35,000/QALY). In the Australian context, screening for SCID should be introduced into the current NBS program from both clinical and economic perspectives.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-515X/8/3/44SCIDnewborn screeningcost-effectivenessMarkov model
spellingShingle Sophy T. F. Shih
Elena Keller
Veronica Wiley
Melanie Wong
Michelle A. Farrar
Georgina M. Chambers
Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
SCID
newborn screening
cost-effectiveness
Markov model
title Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
title_full Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
title_short Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
title_sort economic evaluation of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
topic SCID
newborn screening
cost-effectiveness
Markov model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-515X/8/3/44
work_keys_str_mv AT sophytfshih economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT elenakeller economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT veronicawiley economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT melaniewong economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT michelleafarrar economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency
AT georginamchambers economicevaluationofnewbornscreeningforseverecombinedimmunodeficiency