Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing

Background: While annual cytology has not been recommended for many years, it remains many patients' preferred screening strategy for cervical cancer. Patient education and provider recommendations have been found effective in aligning professional society guidelines with patient preferences. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Schrier, Hunter K. Holt, Miriam Kuppermann, George F. Sawaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mary Ann Liebert 2022-08-01
Series:Women's Health Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2022.0007
_version_ 1797345759979372544
author Elizabeth Schrier
Hunter K. Holt
Miriam Kuppermann
George F. Sawaya
author_facet Elizabeth Schrier
Hunter K. Holt
Miriam Kuppermann
George F. Sawaya
author_sort Elizabeth Schrier
collection DOAJ
description Background: While annual cytology has not been recommended for many years, it remains many patients' preferred screening strategy for cervical cancer. Patient education and provider recommendations have been found effective in aligning professional society guidelines with patient preferences. We assessed whether an educational video with value elicitation exercises (utility assessments) changed screening strategy preferences among patients who had an initial preference for annual screening. Materials and Methods: We conducted an interventional study of English- or Spanish-speaking women 21?65 years of age, recruited from two women's health clinics in San Francisco, California (n?=?262). Participants were asked about their preferred method of screening before viewing a 7-minute educational video and using a computerized tool that elicited values for 23 different health states related to cervical cancer screening. Directly afterward, they were again asked about their preferred screening strategy. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors of changing preferences. Results: Of 246 enrollees, 62.6% (154/246) had an initial preference for annual cytology; after viewing the video and completing the values elicitation exercises, about half (72/154, 47%) preferred a strategy other than annual screening. Having attended college and being screened every 3 to 5 years in the recent past were independent predictors of changing preferences away from annual screening. In sensitivity analyses, 53.2% of average-risk participants changed preferences away from annual cytology (p?<?0.01). Conclusions: Viewing an educational video and conducting a series of value elicitation exercises were associated with a substantially decreased likelihood of preferring annual screening. These findings underscore the importance of patient-centered education to help support informed patient preferences.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:22:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-21167455787042668d14e98edbc6bb55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-4844
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:22:13Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Mary Ann Liebert
record_format Article
series Women's Health Reports
spelling doaj.art-21167455787042668d14e98edbc6bb552024-01-26T05:58:00ZengMary Ann LiebertWomen's Health Reports2688-48442022-08-013170971710.1089/WHR.2022.0007Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual TestingElizabeth SchrierHunter K. HoltMiriam KuppermannGeorge F. SawayaBackground: While annual cytology has not been recommended for many years, it remains many patients' preferred screening strategy for cervical cancer. Patient education and provider recommendations have been found effective in aligning professional society guidelines with patient preferences. We assessed whether an educational video with value elicitation exercises (utility assessments) changed screening strategy preferences among patients who had an initial preference for annual screening. Materials and Methods: We conducted an interventional study of English- or Spanish-speaking women 21?65 years of age, recruited from two women's health clinics in San Francisco, California (n?=?262). Participants were asked about their preferred method of screening before viewing a 7-minute educational video and using a computerized tool that elicited values for 23 different health states related to cervical cancer screening. Directly afterward, they were again asked about their preferred screening strategy. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors of changing preferences. Results: Of 246 enrollees, 62.6% (154/246) had an initial preference for annual cytology; after viewing the video and completing the values elicitation exercises, about half (72/154, 47%) preferred a strategy other than annual screening. Having attended college and being screened every 3 to 5 years in the recent past were independent predictors of changing preferences away from annual screening. In sensitivity analyses, 53.2% of average-risk participants changed preferences away from annual cytology (p?<?0.01). Conclusions: Viewing an educational video and conducting a series of value elicitation exercises were associated with a substantially decreased likelihood of preferring annual screening. These findings underscore the importance of patient-centered education to help support informed patient preferences.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2022.0007patient preferencescervical cancer screeninginformed decision-makingpatient educationhigh-value care
spellingShingle Elizabeth Schrier
Hunter K. Holt
Miriam Kuppermann
George F. Sawaya
Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
Women's Health Reports
patient preferences
cervical cancer screening
informed decision-making
patient education
high-value care
title Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
title_full Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
title_fullStr Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
title_full_unstemmed Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
title_short Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing
title_sort changing preferences for a cervical cancer screening strategy moving away from annual testing
topic patient preferences
cervical cancer screening
informed decision-making
patient education
high-value care
url https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2022.0007
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethschrier changingpreferencesforacervicalcancerscreeningstrategymovingawayfromannualtesting
AT hunterkholt changingpreferencesforacervicalcancerscreeningstrategymovingawayfromannualtesting
AT miriamkuppermann changingpreferencesforacervicalcancerscreeningstrategymovingawayfromannualtesting
AT georgefsawaya changingpreferencesforacervicalcancerscreeningstrategymovingawayfromannualtesting